Effects of Supplementation With Different Specificities of Dietary Fiber on Health-Related Indicators in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Mai Xiang, Li Qiao, Qi Han, Yu Zha, Xuemei Sui, Qirong Wang
{"title":"Effects of Supplementation With Different Specificities of Dietary Fiber on Health-Related Indicators in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Mai Xiang, Li Qiao, Qi Han, Yu Zha, Xuemei Sui, Qirong Wang","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Dietary fiber (DF) exhibits variations in its chemical and physical complexity, as well as in its utilization by the gut microbiota. However, the impact of these differences on the health status of adults with overweight or obesity remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to explore the varying effects of supplementing with different specificities of DF on the health of adults with overweight or obesity, providing guidance on selecting DF supplementation to improve health status.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The literature search encompassed 4 electronic databases-PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE-and was conducted between January 1, 2012, and November 10, 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing DF with placebo treatment, without energy restriction, were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two independent reviewers extracted data using a standardized form, resolving discrepancies through discussion. The data included study characteristics, participant demographics, DF specifications, and outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Random-effects models and the generic inverse variance method were used to analyze data, assuming varying outcomes based on DF specificity. Meta-regression assessed the impact of population, duration, and dosage. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's and Begg's tests. The analysis included 34 trials (n = 1804) examining DF supplementation at 1.5 to 40 g/day for 3 to 16 weeks. DF supplementation significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.13%, fasting insulin by 0.82 μIU/mL, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) by 0.33 in adults with overweight or obesity. Subgroup analyses based on DF specificity revealed differences in effects on HbA1c, fasting insulin, and systolic blood pressure. The low-specificity subgroup showed significant heterogeneity in body weight, body mass index, HbA1c, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR, with a decrease in fasting insulin by 1.09 μIU/mL. The low-to-intermediate-specificity subgroup had reductions in HbA1c by 0.8%, fasting insulin by 2.08 μIU/mL, and HOMA-IR by 0.61. The intermediate-specificity subgroup experienced a 2.85-kg decrease in body weight and a 9.03-mg/dL increase in LDL cholesterol. The mixed subgroup showed an increase in systolic blood pressure by 3.85 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supplementing with different specificities of DF may have distinct effects on health-related indicators in adults with overweight or obesity. Considering individuals' gut microbiota composition and specific health goals is recommended when selecting DF supplementation for adults with overweight or obesity.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023432920.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae193","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Dietary fiber (DF) exhibits variations in its chemical and physical complexity, as well as in its utilization by the gut microbiota. However, the impact of these differences on the health status of adults with overweight or obesity remains unclear.

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to explore the varying effects of supplementing with different specificities of DF on the health of adults with overweight or obesity, providing guidance on selecting DF supplementation to improve health status.

Data sources: The literature search encompassed 4 electronic databases-PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE-and was conducted between January 1, 2012, and November 10, 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing DF with placebo treatment, without energy restriction, were included.

Data extraction: Two independent reviewers extracted data using a standardized form, resolving discrepancies through discussion. The data included study characteristics, participant demographics, DF specifications, and outcome measures.

Data analysis: Random-effects models and the generic inverse variance method were used to analyze data, assuming varying outcomes based on DF specificity. Meta-regression assessed the impact of population, duration, and dosage. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's and Begg's tests. The analysis included 34 trials (n = 1804) examining DF supplementation at 1.5 to 40 g/day for 3 to 16 weeks. DF supplementation significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.13%, fasting insulin by 0.82 μIU/mL, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) by 0.33 in adults with overweight or obesity. Subgroup analyses based on DF specificity revealed differences in effects on HbA1c, fasting insulin, and systolic blood pressure. The low-specificity subgroup showed significant heterogeneity in body weight, body mass index, HbA1c, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR, with a decrease in fasting insulin by 1.09 μIU/mL. The low-to-intermediate-specificity subgroup had reductions in HbA1c by 0.8%, fasting insulin by 2.08 μIU/mL, and HOMA-IR by 0.61. The intermediate-specificity subgroup experienced a 2.85-kg decrease in body weight and a 9.03-mg/dL increase in LDL cholesterol. The mixed subgroup showed an increase in systolic blood pressure by 3.85 mmHg.

Conclusion: Supplementing with different specificities of DF may have distinct effects on health-related indicators in adults with overweight or obesity. Considering individuals' gut microbiota composition and specific health goals is recommended when selecting DF supplementation for adults with overweight or obesity.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023432920.

补充不同特异性膳食纤维对超重或肥胖成人健康相关指标的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:膳食纤维(DF)表现出其化学和物理复杂性的变化,以及其被肠道微生物群利用的变化。然而,这些差异对超重或肥胖成年人健康状况的影响尚不清楚。目的:本荟萃分析旨在探讨补充不同特异性DF对超重或肥胖成人健康的不同影响,为选择补充DF以改善健康状况提供指导。数据来源:文献检索包括pubmed、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和embase 4个电子数据库,检索时间为2012年1月1日至2023年11月10日。随机对照试验比较DF和安慰剂治疗,不限制能量。数据提取:两个独立的审稿人使用标准化的表格提取数据,通过讨论解决差异。数据包括研究特征、参与者人口统计、DF规格和结果测量。数据分析:采用随机效应模型和通用反方差法分析数据,根据DF特异性假设不同的结果。meta回归评估了人群、持续时间和剂量的影响。使用漏斗图和Egger’s和Begg’s检验评估发表偏倚。该分析包括34项试验(n = 1804),研究在3至16周内以1.5至40 g/天的剂量补充DF。补充DF可显著降低超重或肥胖成人的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c) 0.13%,空腹胰岛素0.82 μIU/mL,胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR) 0.33。基于DF特异性的亚组分析显示对HbA1c、空腹胰岛素和收缩压的影响存在差异。低特异性亚组在体重、体重指数、HbA1c、空腹胰岛素和HOMA-IR方面存在显著异质性,空腹胰岛素降低1.09 μIU/mL。低-中特异性亚组HbA1c降低0.8%,空腹胰岛素降低2.08 μIU/mL, HOMA-IR降低0.61。中等特异性亚组体重下降2.85 kg,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇增加9.03 mg/dL。混合亚组收缩压升高3.85 mmHg。结论:补充不同特异性的DF可能对超重或肥胖成人的健康相关指标有不同的影响。在为超重或肥胖的成年人选择膳食补充剂时,建议考虑个人的肠道菌群组成和特定的健康目标。系统评审注册:普洛斯彼罗注册号。CRD42023432920。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信