Machine learning-based assessment of morphometric abnormalities distinguishes bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kewei He, Jingbo Zhang, Yang Huang, Xue Mo, Renqiang Yu, Jing Min, Tong Zhu, Yunfeng Ma, Xiangqian He, Fajin Lv, Jianguang Zeng, Chao Li, Robert K McNamara, Du Lei, Mengqi Liu
{"title":"Machine learning-based assessment of morphometric abnormalities distinguishes bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.","authors":"Kewei He, Jingbo Zhang, Yang Huang, Xue Mo, Renqiang Yu, Jing Min, Tong Zhu, Yunfeng Ma, Xiangqian He, Fajin Lv, Jianguang Zeng, Chao Li, Robert K McNamara, Du Lei, Mengqi Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03544-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) have overlapping clinical presentations which may make it difficult for clinicians to distinguish them potentially resulting in misdiagnosis. This study combined structural MRI and machine learning techniques to determine whether regional morphological differences could distinguish patients with BD and MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 123 participants, including BD (n = 31), MDD (n = 48), and healthy controls (HC, n = 44), underwent high-resolution 3D T1-weighted imaging. Cortical thickness, surface area, and subcortical volumes were measured using FreeSurfer software. Common and classic machine learning models were utilized to identify distinct morphometric alterations between BD and MDD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant morphological differences were observed in both common and distinct brain regions between BD, MDD, and HC. Specifically, abnormalities in the amygdala, thalamus, medial orbitofrontal cortex and fusiform were observed in both BD and MDD compared with HC. Relative to HC, unique differences in BD were identified in the lateral occipital and inferior/middle temporal regions, whereas MDD exhibited differences in nucleus accumbens and middle temporal regions. BD exhibited larger surface area in right middle temporal gyrus and greater right nucleus accumbens volume compared to MDD. The integration of two-stage models, including deep neural network (DNN) and support vector machine (SVM), achieved an accuracy rate of 91.2% in discriminating individuals with BD from MDD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate that structural MRI combined with machine learning techniques can accurately discriminate individuals with BD from MDD, and provide a foundation supporting the potential of this approach to improve diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03544-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) have overlapping clinical presentations which may make it difficult for clinicians to distinguish them potentially resulting in misdiagnosis. This study combined structural MRI and machine learning techniques to determine whether regional morphological differences could distinguish patients with BD and MDD.

Methods: A total of 123 participants, including BD (n = 31), MDD (n = 48), and healthy controls (HC, n = 44), underwent high-resolution 3D T1-weighted imaging. Cortical thickness, surface area, and subcortical volumes were measured using FreeSurfer software. Common and classic machine learning models were utilized to identify distinct morphometric alterations between BD and MDD.

Results: Significant morphological differences were observed in both common and distinct brain regions between BD, MDD, and HC. Specifically, abnormalities in the amygdala, thalamus, medial orbitofrontal cortex and fusiform were observed in both BD and MDD compared with HC. Relative to HC, unique differences in BD were identified in the lateral occipital and inferior/middle temporal regions, whereas MDD exhibited differences in nucleus accumbens and middle temporal regions. BD exhibited larger surface area in right middle temporal gyrus and greater right nucleus accumbens volume compared to MDD. The integration of two-stage models, including deep neural network (DNN) and support vector machine (SVM), achieved an accuracy rate of 91.2% in discriminating individuals with BD from MDD.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that structural MRI combined with machine learning techniques can accurately discriminate individuals with BD from MDD, and provide a foundation supporting the potential of this approach to improve diagnostic accuracy.

基于机器学习的形态测量异常评估区分双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症。
双相情感障碍(BD)和重度抑郁症(MDD)具有重叠的临床表现,这可能使临床医生难以区分它们,从而可能导致误诊。本研究结合结构MRI和机器学习技术来确定区域形态学差异是否可以区分BD和MDD患者。方法:123名参与者,包括BD (n = 31), MDD (n = 48)和健康对照(HC, n = 44),接受高分辨率3D t1加权成像。使用FreeSurfer软件测量皮质厚度、表面积和皮质下体积。常用和经典的机器学习模型用于识别BD和MDD之间不同的形态变化。结果:在BD、MDD和HC的共同和独特脑区均观察到显著的形态学差异。具体而言,与HC相比,BD和MDD患者的杏仁核、丘脑、内侧眶额皮质和梭状回均出现异常。与HC相比,BD在枕外侧和颞下/中颞区有独特的差异,而MDD在伏隔核和颞中区有独特的差异。与MDD相比,BD表现为右侧颞中回表面积更大,右侧伏隔核体积更大。将深度神经网络(DNN)和支持向量机(SVM)两阶段模型相结合,对BD和MDD个体的识别准确率达到91.2%。结论:这些发现表明,结构MRI结合机器学习技术可以准确区分BD和MDD个体,并为该方法提高诊断准确性的潜力提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信