Correlation between the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score and bispectral index in patients receiving propofol titration during general anesthesia induction.

Q3 Medicine
Lihong Chen, Huilin Xie, Xia Huang, Tongfeng Luo, Jing Guo, Chunmeng Lin, Xueyan Liu, Lishuo Shi, Sanqing Jin
{"title":"Correlation between the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score and bispectral index in patients receiving propofol titration during general anesthesia induction.","authors":"Lihong Chen, Huilin Xie, Xia Huang, Tongfeng Luo, Jing Guo, Chunmeng Lin, Xueyan Liu, Lishuo Shi, Sanqing Jin","doi":"10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2025.01.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the relationship between the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAAS) score and the bispectral index (BIS) during propofol titration for general anesthesia induction and analyze the impact of BIS monitoring delay on anesthetic depth assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted among 90 patients (ASA class I-II) undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. For anesthesia induction, the patients received propofol titration at the rate of 0.5 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup> till OAAS scores of 4, 3, 2, and 1 were reached. After achieving an OAAS score of 1, remifentanil (2 μg·kg⁻¹) and rocuronium (0.6 mg·kg⁻¹) were administered, and tracheal intubation was performed 2 min later. BIS values, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and propofol dosage at each OAAS score were recorded, and the correlation between OAAS scores and BIS values was analyzed. The diagnostic performance of BIS values for determining when the OAAS score reaches 1 was analyzed using ROC curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the patients successfully completed tracheal intubation. BIS values of the patients at each of the OAAS scores differed significantly (<i>P</i><0.01), and the mean BIS value decreased by 4.08, 8.32, 5.43 and 5.24 as the OAAS score decreased from 5 to 4, from 4 to 3, from 3 to 2, and from 2 to 1, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the OAAS score and BIS values (<i>ρ</i>=0.775, <i>P</i><0.001). The median BIS value for an OAAS score of 1 was 76, at which point 83.33% of the patients had BIS values exceeding 60. ROC curve analysis showed that for determining an OAAS score of 1, BIS value, at the optimal cutoff value of 84, had a sensitivity of 88.9%, a specificity of 73.3%, and an area under the curve of 0.842 (0.803-0.881).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OAAS score during induction of general anesthesia is strongly correlated with BIS value and is a highly sensitive and timely indicator to compensate for the delay in BIS monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":18962,"journal":{"name":"南方医科大学学报杂志","volume":"45 1","pages":"52-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"南方医科大学学报杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2025.01.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the relationship between the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAAS) score and the bispectral index (BIS) during propofol titration for general anesthesia induction and analyze the impact of BIS monitoring delay on anesthetic depth assessment.

Methods: This study was conducted among 90 patients (ASA class I-II) undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. For anesthesia induction, the patients received propofol titration at the rate of 0.5 mg·kg-1·min-1 till OAAS scores of 4, 3, 2, and 1 were reached. After achieving an OAAS score of 1, remifentanil (2 μg·kg⁻¹) and rocuronium (0.6 mg·kg⁻¹) were administered, and tracheal intubation was performed 2 min later. BIS values, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and propofol dosage at each OAAS score were recorded, and the correlation between OAAS scores and BIS values was analyzed. The diagnostic performance of BIS values for determining when the OAAS score reaches 1 was analyzed using ROC curve.

Results: All the patients successfully completed tracheal intubation. BIS values of the patients at each of the OAAS scores differed significantly (P<0.01), and the mean BIS value decreased by 4.08, 8.32, 5.43 and 5.24 as the OAAS score decreased from 5 to 4, from 4 to 3, from 3 to 2, and from 2 to 1, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the OAAS score and BIS values (ρ=0.775, P<0.001). The median BIS value for an OAAS score of 1 was 76, at which point 83.33% of the patients had BIS values exceeding 60. ROC curve analysis showed that for determining an OAAS score of 1, BIS value, at the optimal cutoff value of 84, had a sensitivity of 88.9%, a specificity of 73.3%, and an area under the curve of 0.842 (0.803-0.881).

Conclusions: OAAS score during induction of general anesthesia is strongly correlated with BIS value and is a highly sensitive and timely indicator to compensate for the delay in BIS monitoring.

全麻诱导时异丙酚滴定患者的警觉/镇静评分与双谱指数的相关性
目的:探讨全麻诱导丙泊酚滴定术中OAAS评分与双谱指数(BIS)的关系,分析BIS监测延迟对麻醉深度评估的影响。方法:本研究对90例全麻下择期手术患者(ASA I-II级)进行研究。麻醉诱导时,患者以0.5 mg·kg-1·min-1的速率进行异丙酚滴注,直至OAAS评分达到4、3、2、1。OAAS评分为1分后,给予瑞芬太尼(2 μg·kg⁻¹)和罗库溴铵(0.6 mg·kg⁻¹),2分钟后进行气管插管。记录各OAAS评分时BIS值、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、异丙酚用量,并分析OAAS评分与BIS值的相关性。采用ROC曲线分析BIS值对判定OAAS评分达到1分的诊断效能。结果:所有患者均成功完成气管插管。各OAAS评分下患者的BIS值差异有统计学意义(p =0.775, p)。结论:全麻诱导时的OAAS评分与BIS值有很强的相关性,是一个高度敏感和及时的指标,可以弥补BIS监测的延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
南方医科大学学报杂志
南方医科大学学报杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
208
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信