Performance of the FORD Versus Other Available Models for the Noninvasive Prediction of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s00408-024-00783-2
Ho Cheol Kim, Abhimanyu Chandel, Christopher S King, Min Jee Kim, Malek Shawabkeh, Ambalavanan Arunachalam, Rade Tomic, Steven D Nathan
{"title":"Performance of the FORD Versus Other Available Models for the Noninvasive Prediction of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.","authors":"Ho Cheol Kim, Abhimanyu Chandel, Christopher S King, Min Jee Kim, Malek Shawabkeh, Ambalavanan Arunachalam, Rade Tomic, Steven D Nathan","doi":"10.1007/s00408-024-00783-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with morbidity and mortality in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Several prediction models have been proposed to predict PH in ILD patients. We sought to discern how previously described prediction models perform in predicting PH in patients with ILD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with ILD who completed a baseline right heart catheterization, from Inova Fairfax Hospital, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, and Asan Medical Center in Korea were enrolled. The performance of various prediction models (FORD model, the FORD calculator, the PH-ILD Detection tool, and the mean pulmonary artery pressure prediction model) were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). There were four definitions of pulmonary hypertension against which the models were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of 192 patients with ILD, of whom 32.8% (n = 63/192) met the modified 5th world symposium on PH definition of precapillary PH. Among the models assessed, the FORD calculator had an AUROC (0.733) that was marginally highest. Subgroup analysis revealed that the FORD index had the highest AUROC (0.817) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, while the FORD calculator had the highest AUROC (0.751) in patients with non-IPF ILD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FORD model can be used to predict group 3 PH in both IPF patients and non-IPF ILD patients. It could serve as a tool for ILD patient selection for right heart catheterization as well as an enrichment tool for clinical trials targeting the pulmonary vasculature.</p>","PeriodicalId":18163,"journal":{"name":"Lung","volume":"203 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00783-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with morbidity and mortality in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Several prediction models have been proposed to predict PH in ILD patients. We sought to discern how previously described prediction models perform in predicting PH in patients with ILD.

Methods: Patients with ILD who completed a baseline right heart catheterization, from Inova Fairfax Hospital, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, and Asan Medical Center in Korea were enrolled. The performance of various prediction models (FORD model, the FORD calculator, the PH-ILD Detection tool, and the mean pulmonary artery pressure prediction model) were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). There were four definitions of pulmonary hypertension against which the models were evaluated.

Results: There were a total of 192 patients with ILD, of whom 32.8% (n = 63/192) met the modified 5th world symposium on PH definition of precapillary PH. Among the models assessed, the FORD calculator had an AUROC (0.733) that was marginally highest. Subgroup analysis revealed that the FORD index had the highest AUROC (0.817) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, while the FORD calculator had the highest AUROC (0.751) in patients with non-IPF ILD.

Conclusion: The FORD model can be used to predict group 3 PH in both IPF patients and non-IPF ILD patients. It could serve as a tool for ILD patient selection for right heart catheterization as well as an enrichment tool for clinical trials targeting the pulmonary vasculature.

FORD与其他可用模型在无创预测间质性肺病患者肺动脉高压中的表现
目的:肺高压(PH)与间质性肺疾病(ILD)患者的发病率和死亡率相关。已经提出了几种预测模型来预测ILD患者的PH。我们试图辨别先前描述的预测模型如何预测ILD患者的PH值。方法:来自Inova Fairfax医院、西北纪念医院和韩国牙山医疗中心完成基线右心导管置入术的ILD患者入组。使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评估各种预测模型(FORD模型、FORD计算器、PH-ILD检测工具和平均肺动脉压预测模型)的性能。对模型进行评估时,有四种肺动脉高压的定义。结果:共192例ILD患者,其中32.8% (n = 63/192)符合修改后的第5届世界研讨会关于毛细前PH的PH定义。在评估的模型中,FORD计算器的AUROC(0.733)略高。亚组分析显示,特发性肺纤维化患者的FORD指数AUROC最高(0.817),而非ipf患者的FORD计算器AUROC最高(0.751)。结论:FORD模型可用于预测IPF患者和非IPF患者的3组PH。它可以作为ILD患者选择右心导管的工具,也可以作为针对肺血管的临床试验的浓缩工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung
Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lung publishes original articles, reviews and editorials on all aspects of the healthy and diseased lungs, of the airways, and of breathing. Epidemiological, clinical, pathophysiological, biochemical, and pharmacological studies fall within the scope of the journal. Case reports, short communications and technical notes can be accepted if they are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信