Prospective Trial of a Passive Diversion Device to Reduce Blood Culture Contamination.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-12-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae751
Sami Arnaout, Shannon Stock, Julia M Clifford, Thomas C Greenough, Azalea Wedig, Michael J Mitchell, Richard T Ellison
{"title":"Prospective Trial of a Passive Diversion Device to Reduce Blood Culture Contamination.","authors":"Sami Arnaout, Shannon Stock, Julia M Clifford, Thomas C Greenough, Azalea Wedig, Michael J Mitchell, Richard T Ellison","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood culture contaminants can lead to inappropriate antibiotic use, prolonged length of stay, and additional hospital costs. Several devices have been developed to reduce the risk of blood culture contamination by diverting a portion of the initial blood sample from the blood culture bottle. We assessed the effectiveness of 1 blood diversion device (BDD) in a prospective trial performed at the 2 separate emergency departments (EDs) of an academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multiphase prospective crossover trial was performed with the BDD in use at 1 ED and standard equipment at the other ED for 10 weeks, and a second 10-week study phase was conducted with the use of the BDD and standard equipment in the EDs reversed. Contaminants were identified both by standard clinical microbiology lab criteria and by independent retrospective review by 3 infectious disease (ID) physicians. The primary analysis was performed based on intention-to-use data using the physician review of positive blood cultures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5637 blood samples were obtained, with 5625 samples analyzed after 12 blood culture results were deemed inconclusive by the ID physician review. The University ED had a higher blood culture contamination rate of 2.9% compared with the Memorial ED at 1.4%. In an intention-to-use analysis, the overall contamination rates were 2.0% and 2.9% in the BDD and standard equipment periods, respectively (<i>P</i> = .03), and in an actual-use analysis the contamination rates were 1.2% and 3.0% for the BDD and standard equipment, respectively (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BDD was associated with significantly lower blood culture contamination rates at the institution's 2 EDs, with a stronger effect noted at the campus caring for higher acuity patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 1","pages":"ofae751"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood culture contaminants can lead to inappropriate antibiotic use, prolonged length of stay, and additional hospital costs. Several devices have been developed to reduce the risk of blood culture contamination by diverting a portion of the initial blood sample from the blood culture bottle. We assessed the effectiveness of 1 blood diversion device (BDD) in a prospective trial performed at the 2 separate emergency departments (EDs) of an academic medical center.

Methods: A multiphase prospective crossover trial was performed with the BDD in use at 1 ED and standard equipment at the other ED for 10 weeks, and a second 10-week study phase was conducted with the use of the BDD and standard equipment in the EDs reversed. Contaminants were identified both by standard clinical microbiology lab criteria and by independent retrospective review by 3 infectious disease (ID) physicians. The primary analysis was performed based on intention-to-use data using the physician review of positive blood cultures.

Results: A total of 5637 blood samples were obtained, with 5625 samples analyzed after 12 blood culture results were deemed inconclusive by the ID physician review. The University ED had a higher blood culture contamination rate of 2.9% compared with the Memorial ED at 1.4%. In an intention-to-use analysis, the overall contamination rates were 2.0% and 2.9% in the BDD and standard equipment periods, respectively (P = .03), and in an actual-use analysis the contamination rates were 1.2% and 3.0% for the BDD and standard equipment, respectively (P < .001).

Conclusions: The BDD was associated with significantly lower blood culture contamination rates at the institution's 2 EDs, with a stronger effect noted at the campus caring for higher acuity patients.

一种减少血液培养污染的被动导流装置的前瞻性试验。
背景:血液培养污染物可导致不适当的抗生素使用,延长住院时间和额外的医院费用。已经开发了几种设备,通过从血液培养瓶中转移一部分初始血液样本来降低血液培养污染的风险。我们在一所学术医疗中心的两个独立急诊科(EDs)进行的前瞻性试验中评估了1种血液分流装置(BDD)的有效性。方法:进行了一项多期前瞻性交叉试验,在一个ED使用BDD,在另一个ED使用标准设备,为期10周,在第二个10周的研究阶段,在ED使用BDD和标准设备。污染物由标准临床微生物实验室标准和3名传染病(ID)医生的独立回顾性审查确定。初步分析是基于使用意向数据,使用阳性血培养的医生审查。结果:共获得5637份血液样本,其中有12份血培养结果被ID医师评审认为不确定,对5625份样本进行了分析。大学ED的血培养污染率为2.9%,高于纪念ED的1.4%。在意向使用分析中,总体污染率在BDD和标准设备期间分别为2.0%和2.9% (P = .03),在实际使用分析中,BDD和标准设备的污染率分别为1.2%和3.0% (P < .001)。结论:在该机构的2个急诊科中,BDD与较低的血培养污染率显著相关,在校园护理高敏度患者时效果更明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信