Quantitative in-vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness following two debonding procedures using laser scanning confocal microscope.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Babak Sayahpour, Sarah Bühling, Abdolreza Jamilian, Sara Eslami, Nicolas Plein, Jakob Stuhlfelder, Silivia Brandt, Vincenzo Grassia, Ludovica Nucci
{"title":"Quantitative in-vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness following two debonding procedures using laser scanning confocal microscope.","authors":"Babak Sayahpour, Sarah Bühling, Abdolreza Jamilian, Sara Eslami, Nicolas Plein, Jakob Stuhlfelder, Silivia Brandt, Vincenzo Grassia, Ludovica Nucci","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.24.05005-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of the in vitro study was to evaluate the impact of two adhesive removal techniques on the surface roughness of the human enamel surface using laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty healthy first upper molar teeth were included in this experiment (20 teeth per each group). T0 measurement of surface roughness parameter of the teeth were conducted using LSCM. The teeth were bonded with metal brackets. Following 24 hours of sample storage in distilled water, the brackets were debonded. A modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) was used to exclude samples with below 90% adhesive remnants on their surface. The remaining 36 teeth were then randomly divided into two groups (18 teeth per group) with the following debonding procedures: group TC (single stage method using a Smoozie tungsten carbide bur) and group TCP (two stage method using a Smoozie tungsten carbide bur, followed by a Smoozie polisher). The time needed for complete adhesive removal was recorded and T1 surface roughness measurements were conducted again after adhesive removal using LSCM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly higher surface roughness values were recorded in group TC, compared to group TCP (P<0.01). Method TCP, on the other hand, was significantly more time-consuming than method TC (P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the fact that the two-stage method (group TCP) was more time consuming, the lower level of enamel surface roughness in this method suggests the superiority of this method.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.24.05005-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective of the in vitro study was to evaluate the impact of two adhesive removal techniques on the surface roughness of the human enamel surface using laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM).

Methods: Forty healthy first upper molar teeth were included in this experiment (20 teeth per each group). T0 measurement of surface roughness parameter of the teeth were conducted using LSCM. The teeth were bonded with metal brackets. Following 24 hours of sample storage in distilled water, the brackets were debonded. A modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) was used to exclude samples with below 90% adhesive remnants on their surface. The remaining 36 teeth were then randomly divided into two groups (18 teeth per group) with the following debonding procedures: group TC (single stage method using a Smoozie tungsten carbide bur) and group TCP (two stage method using a Smoozie tungsten carbide bur, followed by a Smoozie polisher). The time needed for complete adhesive removal was recorded and T1 surface roughness measurements were conducted again after adhesive removal using LSCM.

Results: Significantly higher surface roughness values were recorded in group TC, compared to group TCP (P<0.01). Method TCP, on the other hand, was significantly more time-consuming than method TC (P<0.01).

Conclusions: Despite the fact that the two-stage method (group TCP) was more time consuming, the lower level of enamel surface roughness in this method suggests the superiority of this method.

激光扫描共聚焦显微镜对两次脱粘后牙釉质表面粗糙度的体外定量评价。
背景:采用激光扫描共聚焦显微镜(laser scanning confocal microscopy, LSCM)观察两种不同的黏合剂去除技术对人牙釉质表面粗糙度的影响。方法:选取健康第一上磨牙40颗,每组20颗。采用LSCM对齿面粗糙度参数进行了测量。这些牙齿用金属托架粘在一起。样品在蒸馏水中保存24小时后,支架脱落。采用改进的黏合剂残留指数(ARI)来排除表面黏合剂残留量低于90%的样品。然后将剩余的36颗牙齿随机分为两组(每组18颗牙齿),采用以下方法进行脱粘:TC组(使用Smoozie碳化钨钎片的单阶段方法)和TCP组(使用Smoozie碳化钨钎片的两阶段方法,随后使用Smoozie抛光器)。记录完全去除胶粘剂所需的时间,并在使用LSCM去除胶粘剂后再次进行T1表面粗糙度测量。结果:TC组的牙釉质表面粗糙度值明显高于TCP组(p)。结论:尽管两阶段法(TCP组)耗时较长,但该方法牙釉质表面粗糙度较低,说明了该方法的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva dental and oral science
Minerva dental and oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信