Efficacy and safety of Matricaria chamomilla intervention in managing menopausal symptoms: a triple-blind clinical trial.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Farideh Mohsenzadeh-Ledari, Mouloud Agajani Delavar, Ali Akbar Moghadamnia, Soraya Khafri, Reza Bekhradi, Fereshteh Behmanesh, Shahla Yazdani
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of Matricaria chamomilla intervention in managing menopausal symptoms: a triple-blind clinical trial.","authors":"Farideh Mohsenzadeh-Ledari, Mouloud Agajani Delavar, Ali Akbar Moghadamnia, Soraya Khafri, Reza Bekhradi, Fereshteh Behmanesh, Shahla Yazdani","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Menopausal symptoms can significantly impact women's quality of life. Herbal interventions like Matricaria chamomilla (chamomile) have been suggested as potential remedies. However, their efficacy and safety remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This triple-blind clinical trial enrolled 80 postmenopausal women meeting specific criteria. Inclusion criteria included participants in early or late perimenopause, defined by a symptom score >15, FSH levels >40, or 2 years since menopause, with no significant comorbidities. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention and placebo groups. In a triple-blind clinical trial with 80 postmenopausal women (aged 47-62) from Babol City Health Center, participants were randomly assigned to receive either chamomile (100 mg capsules with 1.2% apigenin, four times daily) or a placebo over 12 weeks. Symptoms of menopause were assessed using the Australian Menopause Association's Scorecard Symptom Questionnaire. Over 12 weeks, they received either chamomile or placebo capsules, with side effect assessments every 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Notable differences were found between the intervention and control groups in the overall scores on the symptom scorecard from baseline to 12 weeks' postintervention (-10.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.84 to -6.92; P < 0.001). Specific subscores also improved in the intervention group: vasomotor (-2.25; 95% CI, -3.09 to -1.42; P < 0.001), psychological (-3.74; 95% CI, -5.29 to -2.20; P < 0.001), locomotor (-2.70; 95% CI, -3.63 to -1.77; P < 0.001), and urological (-1.89; 95% CI, -2.77 to -1.00; P < 0.001). Both groups showed significant changes in total symptom scores over time (P < 0.001). Two participants experienced side effects, including mouth sores, skin spots, and itching, in the chamomile group, which led to their dropping out of the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chamomile intervention shows promise in alleviating menopausal symptoms, but its use warrants caution due to associated side effects. Further research is necessary to optimize dosage and mitigate adverse reactions for safer and more effective management of menopausal symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Menopausal symptoms can significantly impact women's quality of life. Herbal interventions like Matricaria chamomilla (chamomile) have been suggested as potential remedies. However, their efficacy and safety remain underexplored.

Methods: This triple-blind clinical trial enrolled 80 postmenopausal women meeting specific criteria. Inclusion criteria included participants in early or late perimenopause, defined by a symptom score >15, FSH levels >40, or 2 years since menopause, with no significant comorbidities. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention and placebo groups. In a triple-blind clinical trial with 80 postmenopausal women (aged 47-62) from Babol City Health Center, participants were randomly assigned to receive either chamomile (100 mg capsules with 1.2% apigenin, four times daily) or a placebo over 12 weeks. Symptoms of menopause were assessed using the Australian Menopause Association's Scorecard Symptom Questionnaire. Over 12 weeks, they received either chamomile or placebo capsules, with side effect assessments every 4 weeks.

Results: Notable differences were found between the intervention and control groups in the overall scores on the symptom scorecard from baseline to 12 weeks' postintervention (-10.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.84 to -6.92; P < 0.001). Specific subscores also improved in the intervention group: vasomotor (-2.25; 95% CI, -3.09 to -1.42; P < 0.001), psychological (-3.74; 95% CI, -5.29 to -2.20; P < 0.001), locomotor (-2.70; 95% CI, -3.63 to -1.77; P < 0.001), and urological (-1.89; 95% CI, -2.77 to -1.00; P < 0.001). Both groups showed significant changes in total symptom scores over time (P < 0.001). Two participants experienced side effects, including mouth sores, skin spots, and itching, in the chamomile group, which led to their dropping out of the study.

Conclusions: Chamomile intervention shows promise in alleviating menopausal symptoms, but its use warrants caution due to associated side effects. Further research is necessary to optimize dosage and mitigate adverse reactions for safer and more effective management of menopausal symptoms.

甘菊干预治疗更年期症状的有效性和安全性:一项三盲临床试验。
目的:绝经期症状可显著影响女性的生活质量。像洋甘菊(洋甘菊)这样的草药干预被认为是潜在的补救措施。然而,它们的有效性和安全性仍未得到充分研究。方法:这项三盲临床试验招募了80名符合特定标准的绝经后妇女。纳入标准包括围绝经期早期或晚期的参与者,症状评分为>5,FSH水平为bbb40,或绝经后2年,无明显合并症。参与者被随机分配到干预组和安慰剂组。在一项来自Babol市健康中心的80名绝经后妇女(47-62岁)的三盲临床试验中,参与者被随机分配接受洋甘菊(100毫克含1.2%芹菜素胶囊,每天4次)或安慰剂,持续12周。使用澳大利亚更年期协会的记分卡症状问卷评估更年期症状。在12周的时间里,他们服用洋甘菊胶囊或安慰剂胶囊,每4周评估一次副作用。结果:干预组与对照组在症状记分卡上从基线到干预后12周的总得分有显著差异(-10.36;95%置信区间[CI], -13.84 ~ -6.92;P < 0.001)。干预组的特定评分也有所改善:血管舒缩(-2.25;95% CI, -3.09 ~ -1.42;P < 0.001),心理(-3.74;95% CI, -5.29 ~ -2.20;P < 0.001),运动能力(-2.70;95% CI, -3.63 ~ -1.77;P < 0.001),泌尿外科(-1.89;95% CI, -2.77 ~ -1.00;P < 0.001)。两组总症状评分随时间的变化均有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。在洋甘菊组中,两名参与者出现了副作用,包括口腔溃疡、皮肤斑点和瘙痒,这导致他们退出了研究。结论:洋甘菊干预在缓解更年期症状方面显示出希望,但由于相关的副作用,其使用需要谨慎。有必要进一步研究优化剂量和减轻不良反应,以更安全、更有效地管理更年期症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信