Performance of ChatGPT-4o in the diagnostic workup of fever among returning travellers requiring hospitalization: a validation study.

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Dana Yelin, Neta Shirin, Itai Harris, Yovel Peretz, Dafna Yahav, Eli Schwartz, Eyal Leshem, Ili Margalit
{"title":"Performance of ChatGPT-4o in the diagnostic workup of fever among returning travellers requiring hospitalization: a validation study.","authors":"Dana Yelin, Neta Shirin, Itai Harris, Yovel Peretz, Dafna Yahav, Eli Schwartz, Eyal Leshem, Ili Margalit","doi":"10.1093/jtm/taaf005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Febrile illness in returned travellers presents a diagnostic challenge in non-endemic settings. Chat generative pretrained transformer (ChatGPT) has the potential to assist in medical tasks, yet its diagnostic performance in clinical settings has rarely been evaluated. We conducted a validation assessment of ChatGPT-4o's performance in the workup of fever in returning travellers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved the medical records of returning travellers hospitalized with fever during 2009-2024. Their clinical scenarios at time of presentation to the emergency department were prompted to ChatGPT-4o, using a detailed uniform format. The model was further prompted with four consistent questions concerning the differential diagnosis and recommended workup. To avoid training, we kept the model blinded to the final diagnosis. Our primary outcome was ChatGPT-4o's success rates in predicting the final diagnosis when requested to specify the top three differential diagnoses. Secondary outcomes were success rates when prompted to specify the single most likely diagnosis, and all necessary diagnostics. We also assessed ChatGPT-4o as a predicting tool for malaria and qualitatively evaluated its failures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT-4o predicted the final diagnosis in 68% [95% confidence interval (CI) 59-77%], 78% (95% CI 69-85%) and 83% (95% CI 74-89%) of the 114 cases, when prompted to specify the most likely diagnosis, top three diagnoses and all possible diagnoses, respectively. ChatGPT-4o showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 93-100%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 85-98%) for predicting malaria. The model failed to provide the final diagnosis in 18% (20/114) of cases, primarily by failing to predict globally endemic infections (16/21, 76%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT-4o demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy when prompted with real-life scenarios of febrile returning travellers presenting to the emergency department, especially for malaria. Model training is expected to yield an improved performance and facilitate diagnostic decision-making in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":17407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of travel medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of travel medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaf005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Febrile illness in returned travellers presents a diagnostic challenge in non-endemic settings. Chat generative pretrained transformer (ChatGPT) has the potential to assist in medical tasks, yet its diagnostic performance in clinical settings has rarely been evaluated. We conducted a validation assessment of ChatGPT-4o's performance in the workup of fever in returning travellers.

Methods: We retrieved the medical records of returning travellers hospitalized with fever during 2009-2024. Their clinical scenarios at time of presentation to the emergency department were prompted to ChatGPT-4o, using a detailed uniform format. The model was further prompted with four consistent questions concerning the differential diagnosis and recommended workup. To avoid training, we kept the model blinded to the final diagnosis. Our primary outcome was ChatGPT-4o's success rates in predicting the final diagnosis when requested to specify the top three differential diagnoses. Secondary outcomes were success rates when prompted to specify the single most likely diagnosis, and all necessary diagnostics. We also assessed ChatGPT-4o as a predicting tool for malaria and qualitatively evaluated its failures.

Results: ChatGPT-4o predicted the final diagnosis in 68% [95% confidence interval (CI) 59-77%], 78% (95% CI 69-85%) and 83% (95% CI 74-89%) of the 114 cases, when prompted to specify the most likely diagnosis, top three diagnoses and all possible diagnoses, respectively. ChatGPT-4o showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 93-100%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 85-98%) for predicting malaria. The model failed to provide the final diagnosis in 18% (20/114) of cases, primarily by failing to predict globally endemic infections (16/21, 76%).

Conclusions: ChatGPT-4o demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy when prompted with real-life scenarios of febrile returning travellers presenting to the emergency department, especially for malaria. Model training is expected to yield an improved performance and facilitate diagnostic decision-making in the field.

chatgpt - 40在需要住院治疗的回国旅行者发烧诊断检查中的表现:一项验证研究。
背景:返国旅行者的发热性疾病在非流行环境中提出了诊断挑战。聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)具有协助医疗任务的潜力,但其在临床环境中的诊断性能很少得到评估。我们对chatgpt - 40在返国旅行者发热检查中的表现进行了初步验证评估。方法:检索2009-2024年因发热住院的归国旅客病历。这些病例在提交给急诊科时的临床情况被提示到chatgpt - 40,使用详细的统一格式。该模型进一步提示了关于鉴别诊断和推荐的检查的四个一致的问题。为了避免训练,我们让模型对最终诊断保持盲态。我们的主要结果是chatgpt - 40预测最终诊断(金标准)的成功率,当被要求指定前3种鉴别诊断时。次要结果是提示指定单一最可能诊断和所有必要诊断时的成功率。我们还对chatgpt - 40作为疟疾预测工具进行了评估,并对其失败进行了定性评估。结果:当提示指定最可能的诊断、前三种诊断和所有可能的诊断时,chatgpt - 40分别预测了114例病例中68% (95% CI 59-77%)、78% (95% CI 69-85%)和83% (95% CI 74-89%)的最终诊断。chatgpt - 40在预测疟疾方面的敏感性为100% (95% CI 93-100%),特异性为94% (95% CI 85-98%)。该模型在18%(20/114)的病例中未能提供最终诊断,主要是由于未能预测全球地方性感染(16/21,76%)。结论:chatgpt - 40显示出较高的诊断准确性,当提示与现实情景的发烧返回旅行者出现在急诊室,特别是疟疾。模型训练有望提高性能,并促进现场的诊断决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of travel medicine
Journal of travel medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
5.10%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Travel Medicine is a publication that focuses on travel medicine and its intersection with other disciplines. It publishes cutting-edge research, consensus papers, policy papers, and expert reviews. The journal is affiliated with the Asia Pacific Travel Health Society. The journal's main areas of interest include the prevention and management of travel-associated infections, non-communicable diseases, vaccines, malaria prevention and treatment, multi-drug resistant pathogens, and surveillance on all individuals crossing international borders. The Journal of Travel Medicine is indexed in multiple major indexing services, including Adis International Ltd., CABI, EBSCOhost, Elsevier BV, Gale, Journal Watch Infectious Diseases (Online), MetaPress, National Library of Medicine, OCLC, Ovid, ProQuest, Thomson Reuters, and the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信