Beyond the random phase approximation for calculating Curie temperatures in ferromagnets: application to Fe, Ni, Co and monolayer CrI3.

IF 2.3 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER
Varun Rajeev Pavizhakumari, Thorbjørn Skovhus, Thomas Olsen
{"title":"Beyond the random phase approximation for calculating Curie temperatures in ferromagnets: application to Fe, Ni, Co and monolayer CrI<sub>3</sub>.","authors":"Varun Rajeev Pavizhakumari, Thorbjørn Skovhus, Thomas Olsen","doi":"10.1088/1361-648X/ada65c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The magnetic properties of solids are typically analyzed in terms of Heisenberg models where the electronic structure is approximated by interacting localized spins. However, even in such models the evaluation of thermodynamic properties constitutes a major challenge and is usually handled by a mean field decoupling scheme. The random phase approximation (RPA) comprises a common approach and is often applied to evaluate critical temperatures although it is well known that the method is only accurate well<i>below</i>the critical temperature. In the present work we compare the performance of the RPA with a different decoupling scheme proposed by Callen as well as the mean field decoupling of interacting Holstein-Primakoff (HP) magnons. We consider three-dimensional (3D) as well as two-dimensional (2D) model systems where the Curie temperature is governed by anisotropy. In 3D, the Callen method is the most accurate in the classical limit, and we show that the Callen decoupling (CD) produces the best agreement with experiments for bcc Fe, fcc Ni and fcc Co with exchange interactions obtained from first principles. In contrast, for low spin systems where a quantum mechanical treatment is pertinent, the HP and RPA methods are superior to the CD. In 2D systems with magnetic order driven by single-ion anisotropy, it is shown that HP fails rather dramatically and both RPA and Callen approaches severely overestimates Curie temperatures. The most accurate approach is then constructed by combining RPA with the CD of single-ion anisotropy, which yields the correct lack of order forS=1/2. We exemplify this by the case of monolayer CrI<sub>3</sub>using exchange constant extracted from experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter","volume":"37 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ada65c","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The magnetic properties of solids are typically analyzed in terms of Heisenberg models where the electronic structure is approximated by interacting localized spins. However, even in such models the evaluation of thermodynamic properties constitutes a major challenge and is usually handled by a mean field decoupling scheme. The random phase approximation (RPA) comprises a common approach and is often applied to evaluate critical temperatures although it is well known that the method is only accurate wellbelowthe critical temperature. In the present work we compare the performance of the RPA with a different decoupling scheme proposed by Callen as well as the mean field decoupling of interacting Holstein-Primakoff (HP) magnons. We consider three-dimensional (3D) as well as two-dimensional (2D) model systems where the Curie temperature is governed by anisotropy. In 3D, the Callen method is the most accurate in the classical limit, and we show that the Callen decoupling (CD) produces the best agreement with experiments for bcc Fe, fcc Ni and fcc Co with exchange interactions obtained from first principles. In contrast, for low spin systems where a quantum mechanical treatment is pertinent, the HP and RPA methods are superior to the CD. In 2D systems with magnetic order driven by single-ion anisotropy, it is shown that HP fails rather dramatically and both RPA and Callen approaches severely overestimates Curie temperatures. The most accurate approach is then constructed by combining RPA with the CD of single-ion anisotropy, which yields the correct lack of order forS=1/2. We exemplify this by the case of monolayer CrI3using exchange constant extracted from experiments.

计算铁磁体居里温度的超越随机相位近似:在Fe, Ni, Co和单层CrI3中的应用。
固体的磁性通常是根据海森堡模型来分析的,其中电子结构是由相互作用的局域自旋近似的。然而,即使在这样的模型中,热力学性质的评估也是一个主要的挑战,通常由平均场解耦方案来处理。随机相位近似(RPA)是一种常用的方法,通常用于评估临界温度,尽管众所周知,该方法只能准确地低于临界温度。在本工作中,我们比较了由Callen提出的不同解耦方案以及相互作用的Holstein-Primakoff (HP)磁振子的平均场解耦的性能。我们考虑三维(3D)和二维(2D)模型系统,其中居里温度由各向异性控制。在三维空间中,Callen方法在经典极限下是最精确的,并且我们发现Callen解耦(CD)与从第一原理得到的bcc Fe, fcc Ni和fcc Co的交换相互作用的实验结果最吻合。相比之下,对于量子力学处理相关的低自旋系统,HP和RPA方法优于CD。在单离子各向异性驱动的磁序二维系统中,HP显着失败,RPA和Callen方法严重高估了居里温度。然后将RPA与单离子各向异性的CD相结合构建了最精确的方法,该方法可以得到s =1/2的正确缺阶。我们用从实验中提取的交换常数来举例说明这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 物理-物理:凝聚态物理
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
1288
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter covers the whole of condensed matter physics including soft condensed matter and nanostructures. Papers may report experimental, theoretical and simulation studies. Note that papers must contain fundamental condensed matter science: papers reporting methods of materials preparation or properties of materials without novel condensed matter content will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信