Impact of surface pre-treatment on bond strength between cement and zirconia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.014

Azita Mazaheri Tehrani, Majedeh Nami, Arash Zarbakhsh, Anahita Moscowchi, Ezatollah Jalalian

{"title":"Impact of surface pre-treatment on bond strength between cement and zirconia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Azita Mazaheri Tehrani, Majedeh Nami, Arash Zarbakhsh, Anahita Moscowchi, Ezatollah Jalalian","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statement of problem: The optimal zirconia pretreatment, contingent upon the type of cement used, warrants further research.Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the influence of various surface pretreatments on the bonding efficacy of cement to zirconia.Material and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for in vitro studies related to bonding with zirconia up to April 2024, supplemented by a manual search. A network meta-analysis was executed to compare different types of cement.Results: Of the 6118 articles screened, 21 were selected for inclusion in this review. These studies examined various surface pretreatment techniques, primers, resin cements, aging protocols, and bond strength testing methods. The highest bond strengths were observed with 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-based cements. The network meta-analysis indicated that mechanical and mechano-chemical pretreatments yielded superior results across all cement types.Conclusions: The existing evidence indicates that both surface pretreatments and the specific type of cement should be considered when interpreting the findings of in vitro studies for their application in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: The optimal zirconia pretreatment, contingent upon the type of cement used, warrants further research.

Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the influence of various surface pretreatments on the bonding efficacy of cement to zirconia.

Material and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for in vitro studies related to bonding with zirconia up to April 2024, supplemented by a manual search. A network meta-analysis was executed to compare different types of cement.

Results: Of the 6118 articles screened, 21 were selected for inclusion in this review. These studies examined various surface pretreatment techniques, primers, resin cements, aging protocols, and bond strength testing methods. The highest bond strengths were observed with 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-based cements. The network meta-analysis indicated that mechanical and mechano-chemical pretreatments yielded superior results across all cement types.

Conclusions: The existing evidence indicates that both surface pretreatments and the specific type of cement should be considered when interpreting the findings of in vitro studies for their application in clinical practice.

查看原文本刊更多论文

表面预处理对水泥与氧化锆粘结强度的影响：系统综述和网络荟萃分析。

问题陈述：最佳的氧化锆预处理，取决于所使用的水泥类型，值得进一步研究。目的：研究不同表面预处理对水泥与氧化锆粘结效果的影响。材料和方法：在PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行了全面的检索，检索截止到2024年4月与氧化锆键合相关的体外研究，并辅以人工检索。网络荟萃分析执行比较不同类型的水泥。结果：在筛选的6118篇文章中，有21篇被纳入本综述。这些研究考察了各种表面预处理技术、底漆、树脂水泥、老化方案和粘结强度测试方法。10-甲基丙烯酰氧癸基磷酸二氢（MDP）基胶结物的粘结强度最高。网络荟萃分析表明，机械和机械化学预处理在所有水泥类型中都产生了优越的结果。结论：现有证据表明，在解释体外研究结果以应用于临床实践时，应考虑表面预处理和特定类型的水泥。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

7.00

自引率

13.00%

发文量

599

审稿时长

69 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.