The Effect of Swing on Stress and Comfort in Premature Newborns: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Hediye Karakoç, Arzu Çiftçi, Büşra Ayhan
{"title":"The Effect of Swing on Stress and Comfort in Premature Newborns: A Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Hediye Karakoç, Arzu Çiftçi, Büşra Ayhan","doi":"10.1111/jpc.16785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study was conducted to investigate the effect of swing on stress and comfort in premature newborns who could not be reunited with their mothers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in a randomised controlled experimental design. The intervention group included newborns who received swing intervention (n = 64) and the control group included newborns who did not receive swing intervention (n = 64). Research data were collected using Newborn Information Form, Premature Infant Comfort Scale and ALPS neo newborn pain and stress assessment scale. The research data were collected two times, before and after the intervention was completed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Experimental and control groups were similar regarding descriptive characteristics. There was no difference between the groups after the swing intervention (p > 0.05). It was determined that there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of comfort levels before and after the swing intervention (p > 0.05). When the intra-group mean scores were compared, it was determined that the comfort level increased in the intervention group before and after the swing intervention, and there was a significant difference between the mean scores (p = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was determined that swing intervention did not affect the stress and comfort level of the newborn.</p>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study was conducted to investigate the effect of swing on stress and comfort in premature newborns who could not be reunited with their mothers.

Methods: The study was conducted in a randomised controlled experimental design. The intervention group included newborns who received swing intervention (n = 64) and the control group included newborns who did not receive swing intervention (n = 64). Research data were collected using Newborn Information Form, Premature Infant Comfort Scale and ALPS neo newborn pain and stress assessment scale. The research data were collected two times, before and after the intervention was completed.

Result: Experimental and control groups were similar regarding descriptive characteristics. There was no difference between the groups after the swing intervention (p > 0.05). It was determined that there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of comfort levels before and after the swing intervention (p > 0.05). When the intra-group mean scores were compared, it was determined that the comfort level increased in the intervention group before and after the swing intervention, and there was a significant difference between the mean scores (p = 0.028).

Conclusion: It was determined that swing intervention did not affect the stress and comfort level of the newborn.

摇摆对早产儿压力和舒适的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在探讨荡秋千对不能与母亲团聚的早产儿压力和舒适度的影响。方法:采用随机对照试验设计。干预组包括接受秋千干预的新生儿(n = 64),对照组包括未接受秋千干预的新生儿(n = 64)。研究数据采用新生儿信息表、早产儿舒适量表和ALPS新生儿疼痛和应激评估量表收集。研究数据收集于干预完成前后两次。结果:实验组与对照组描述性特征相似。摇摆干预后各组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。经测定,两组患者在摇摆干预前后的舒适程度无显著差异(p < 0.05)。比较组内均分,确定干预组在摇摆干预前后舒适度有所提高,均分差异有统计学意义(p = 0.028)。结论:秋千干预对新生儿的应激和舒适水平无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信