The internal jugular approach for baffle puncture and ablation of atrial arrhythmias in patients with atrial switch procedures: a retrospective analysis.
Christopher J Goulden, Johan Waktare, Derick Todd, Justin Ratnasingham, Reza Ashrafi
{"title":"The internal jugular approach for baffle puncture and ablation of atrial arrhythmias in patients with atrial switch procedures: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Christopher J Goulden, Johan Waktare, Derick Todd, Justin Ratnasingham, Reza Ashrafi","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01978-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) who undergo atrial switch procedures may develop symptomatic atrial arrhythmias necessitating ablation. We present a single-centre retrospective analysis of a novel approach using jugular access for catheter ablation in this unique patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 5-year retrospective analysis was conducted on patients referred for atrial arrhythmia ablation following atrial switch procedures. Procedures were performed by experienced operators, and data on patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between jugular and femoral access groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Jugular access (N = 9) and femoral access (N = 13) cohorts were comparable in age, gender distribution, and clinical characteristics. Procedural success rates were high in both groups, with no significant difference in recurrence rates. Jugular access demonstrated a comparatively safe profile compared to femoral access.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The jugular approach offers a viable alternative to femoral access for atrial arrhythmia ablation in patients with atrial switch procedures. The trajectory from the internal jugular vein to the baffle is straightforward, reducing vascular complications. Success rates and procedural times were comparable, highlighting the feasibility and safety of the jugular approach. The option for rapid post-procedural mobilisation adds to its appeal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Atrial arrhythmia ablation with jugular access in patients with atrial switch procedures is safe and effective, providing an alternative in cases where femoral access may pose challenges. This approach warrants consideration in the management of atrial arrhythmias in this unique patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01978-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) who undergo atrial switch procedures may develop symptomatic atrial arrhythmias necessitating ablation. We present a single-centre retrospective analysis of a novel approach using jugular access for catheter ablation in this unique patient population.
Methods: A 5-year retrospective analysis was conducted on patients referred for atrial arrhythmia ablation following atrial switch procedures. Procedures were performed by experienced operators, and data on patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between jugular and femoral access groups.
Results: Jugular access (N = 9) and femoral access (N = 13) cohorts were comparable in age, gender distribution, and clinical characteristics. Procedural success rates were high in both groups, with no significant difference in recurrence rates. Jugular access demonstrated a comparatively safe profile compared to femoral access.
Discussion: The jugular approach offers a viable alternative to femoral access for atrial arrhythmia ablation in patients with atrial switch procedures. The trajectory from the internal jugular vein to the baffle is straightforward, reducing vascular complications. Success rates and procedural times were comparable, highlighting the feasibility and safety of the jugular approach. The option for rapid post-procedural mobilisation adds to its appeal.
Conclusion: Atrial arrhythmia ablation with jugular access in patients with atrial switch procedures is safe and effective, providing an alternative in cases where femoral access may pose challenges. This approach warrants consideration in the management of atrial arrhythmias in this unique patient population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.