The internal jugular approach for baffle puncture and ablation of atrial arrhythmias in patients with atrial switch procedures: a retrospective analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Christopher J Goulden, Johan Waktare, Derick Todd, Justin Ratnasingham, Reza Ashrafi
{"title":"The internal jugular approach for baffle puncture and ablation of atrial arrhythmias in patients with atrial switch procedures: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Christopher J Goulden, Johan Waktare, Derick Todd, Justin Ratnasingham, Reza Ashrafi","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01978-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) who undergo atrial switch procedures may develop symptomatic atrial arrhythmias necessitating ablation. We present a single-centre retrospective analysis of a novel approach using jugular access for catheter ablation in this unique patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 5-year retrospective analysis was conducted on patients referred for atrial arrhythmia ablation following atrial switch procedures. Procedures were performed by experienced operators, and data on patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between jugular and femoral access groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Jugular access (N = 9) and femoral access (N = 13) cohorts were comparable in age, gender distribution, and clinical characteristics. Procedural success rates were high in both groups, with no significant difference in recurrence rates. Jugular access demonstrated a comparatively safe profile compared to femoral access.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The jugular approach offers a viable alternative to femoral access for atrial arrhythmia ablation in patients with atrial switch procedures. The trajectory from the internal jugular vein to the baffle is straightforward, reducing vascular complications. Success rates and procedural times were comparable, highlighting the feasibility and safety of the jugular approach. The option for rapid post-procedural mobilisation adds to its appeal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Atrial arrhythmia ablation with jugular access in patients with atrial switch procedures is safe and effective, providing an alternative in cases where femoral access may pose challenges. This approach warrants consideration in the management of atrial arrhythmias in this unique patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01978-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) who undergo atrial switch procedures may develop symptomatic atrial arrhythmias necessitating ablation. We present a single-centre retrospective analysis of a novel approach using jugular access for catheter ablation in this unique patient population.

Methods: A 5-year retrospective analysis was conducted on patients referred for atrial arrhythmia ablation following atrial switch procedures. Procedures were performed by experienced operators, and data on patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between jugular and femoral access groups.

Results: Jugular access (N = 9) and femoral access (N = 13) cohorts were comparable in age, gender distribution, and clinical characteristics. Procedural success rates were high in both groups, with no significant difference in recurrence rates. Jugular access demonstrated a comparatively safe profile compared to femoral access.

Discussion: The jugular approach offers a viable alternative to femoral access for atrial arrhythmia ablation in patients with atrial switch procedures. The trajectory from the internal jugular vein to the baffle is straightforward, reducing vascular complications. Success rates and procedural times were comparable, highlighting the feasibility and safety of the jugular approach. The option for rapid post-procedural mobilisation adds to its appeal.

Conclusion: Atrial arrhythmia ablation with jugular access in patients with atrial switch procedures is safe and effective, providing an alternative in cases where femoral access may pose challenges. This approach warrants consideration in the management of atrial arrhythmias in this unique patient population.

颈内入路对行心房开关手术的心房心律失常患者进行挡片穿刺和消融的回顾性分析。
背景:大动脉转位(TGA)患者在接受心房开关手术后可能出现症状性心房心律失常,需要消融。我们提出了一个单中心回顾性分析的新方法使用颈静脉导管消融在这一独特的患者群体。方法:回顾性分析5年心房开关手术后心房心律失常消融患者。手术由经验丰富的操作人员执行,并收集了患者人口统计学、手术特征和结果的数据。对颈静脉组和股静脉组的结果进行统计分析。结果:颈静脉通路(N = 9)和股静脉通路(N = 13)在年龄、性别分布和临床特征上具有可比性。两组手术成功率均较高,复发率无显著差异。颈静脉入路比股静脉入路更安全。讨论:颈静脉入路为心房转换手术患者心房心律失常消融提供了一种可行的替代方法。从颈内静脉到挡板的轨迹是直接的,减少了血管并发症。成功率和手术时间相当,突出了颈静脉入路的可行性和安全性。手术后快速动员的选择增加了它的吸引力。结论:心房切换手术患者颈静脉入路心房心律失常消融是安全有效的,为股骨入路可能带来挑战的病例提供了一种选择。这种方法值得考虑的管理心房心律失常在这一独特的患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信