Physical fitness assessment tools for children with developmental coordination disorder and their feasibility for low-income settings: A systematic review.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jesf.2024.12.005
Monica Maria do Nascimento, Jorge Lopes Cavalcante-Neto, Meyene Duque Weber, Paula Cristina Dos Santos Rodrigues, Andreia N Pizarro, Maria Olga Fernandes Vasconcelos
{"title":"Physical fitness assessment tools for children with developmental coordination disorder and their feasibility for low-income settings: A systematic review.","authors":"Monica Maria do Nascimento, Jorge Lopes Cavalcante-Neto, Meyene Duque Weber, Paula Cristina Dos Santos Rodrigues, Andreia N Pizarro, Maria Olga Fernandes Vasconcelos","doi":"10.1016/j.jesf.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study systematically reviewed the literature on physical fitness assessment tools for children with developmental coordination disorder compared with typically developing children aged 7 to 10 and analyzed the feasibility of these tools for use in low-income settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO/RIC databases. The Newcastle - Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale assessed the methodological quality of the studies, and a checklist adapted from COSMIN assessed the feasibility of the instruments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 8470 studies initially retrieved, 21 were included in this systematic review. The most assessed physical fitness components in children with developmental coordination disorder compared with typically developing children were cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength. Most studies had high methodological quality. The shuttle run (cardiorespiratory fitness) and handgrip dynamometer (muscle strength) were the most used tools. The PERF-FIT, long jump, and 6-min walk test were considered the most feasible tools for low-income settings, while the incremental treadmill test was deemed the least feasible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings evidenced several viable tools for testing physical fitness in children with DCD compared to typically developing peers from low-income countries. The most viable, as PERF-FIT, long jump and 6-min walk test should be used on large scale in low-income settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness","volume":"23 1","pages":"51-59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2024.12.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study systematically reviewed the literature on physical fitness assessment tools for children with developmental coordination disorder compared with typically developing children aged 7 to 10 and analyzed the feasibility of these tools for use in low-income settings.

Methods: Searches were conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO/RIC databases. The Newcastle - Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale assessed the methodological quality of the studies, and a checklist adapted from COSMIN assessed the feasibility of the instruments.

Results: From 8470 studies initially retrieved, 21 were included in this systematic review. The most assessed physical fitness components in children with developmental coordination disorder compared with typically developing children were cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength. Most studies had high methodological quality. The shuttle run (cardiorespiratory fitness) and handgrip dynamometer (muscle strength) were the most used tools. The PERF-FIT, long jump, and 6-min walk test were considered the most feasible tools for low-income settings, while the incremental treadmill test was deemed the least feasible.

Conclusion: The findings evidenced several viable tools for testing physical fitness in children with DCD compared to typically developing peers from low-income countries. The most viable, as PERF-FIT, long jump and 6-min walk test should be used on large scale in low-income settings.

发育协调障碍儿童体能评估工具及其在低收入环境下的可行性:一项系统综述。
背景:本研究系统回顾了有关7 ~ 10岁发育性协调障碍儿童与正常发育儿童体质评估工具的文献,并分析了这些工具在低收入环境中使用的可行性。方法:在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和EBSCO/RIC数据库中进行检索。纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表评估了研究的方法学质量,从COSMIN改编的清单评估了这些工具的可行性。结果:从最初检索的8470项研究中,21项纳入本系统综述。发育性协调障碍儿童与正常发育儿童相比,评估最多的身体健康成分是心肺健康和肌肉力量。大多数研究具有较高的方法学质量。穿梭跑(心肺健康)和握力计(肌肉力量)是最常用的工具。PERF-FIT、跳远和6分钟步行测试被认为是低收入环境中最可行的工具,而增量跑步机测试被认为是最不可行的。结论:与来自低收入国家的典型发展中国家的同龄人相比,研究结果证明了几种可行的测试DCD儿童身体健康的工具。最可行的,如PERF-FIT,跳远和6分钟步行测试应在低收入环境中大规模使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness is the official peer-reviewed journal of The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness (SCSEPF), the Physical Fitness Association of Hong Kong, China (HKPFA), and the Hong Kong Association of Sports Medicine and Sports Science (HKASMSS). It is published twice a year, in June and December, by Elsevier. The Journal accepts original investigations, comprehensive reviews, case studies and short communications on current topics in exercise science, physical fitness and physical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信