No Injury Observed in Kidneys Treated with Burst Wave Lithotripsy in Therapeutically Anticoagulated Pigs.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Thomas M Shelton, Bret A Connors, Marcelino E Rivera, James E Lingeman, Michael R Bailey, James C Williams
{"title":"No Injury Observed in Kidneys Treated with Burst Wave Lithotripsy in Therapeutically Anticoagulated Pigs.","authors":"Thomas M Shelton, Bret A Connors, Marcelino E Rivera, James E Lingeman, Michael R Bailey, James C Williams","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Current American Urological Association guidelines recommend that patients with acute obstructive kidney stone requiring continuous anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy should not be treated by shockwave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy because of the risk of catastrophic renal hemorrhage possible with those techniques. Currently, ureteroscopy is the only recommended surgical treatment. We evaluated if burst wave lithotripsy (BWL) could be used in these cases by treating pigs with BWL while undergoing anticoagulation therapy. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Six pigs (31-37 kg) were given 200 units/kg porcine heparin, and then the right kidney of each animal was treated with a dose of BWL (18,000 ultrasound pulses at 10 Hz, 20 cycles/pulse, peak positive pressure of 12 MPa) known to fracture kidney stones. The contralateral kidney served as a control. Therapeutic anticoagulation was confirmed by evaluating activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Microhematuria was checked by urine test strips. Kidneys were subsequently evaluated for hemorrhagic injury via MRI. <b><i>Results:</i></b> aPTT was significantly elevated (>100 seconds) throughout the entire treatment period (<i>p</i> = <0.001) indicating therapeutic anticoagulation. Gross hematuria was not observed in any of the pigs. After BWL, microhematuria averaged 145.8 red blood cells (RBC)/μL in the BWL-treated kidney and 48 RBC/μL in the control kidneys, and there was no statistically significant difference noted in microhematuria rates between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.16). Hemorrhagic injury measured only 0.10 ± 0.02% of the tissue in the BWL-treated kidneys and 0.12 ± 0.04% in the control side, with a paired difference of -0.03 ± 0.05%, showing no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.58). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A typical clinical dose of BWL causes no hemorrhagic injury to the kidney even during therapeutic anticoagulation therapy. This result suggests that BWL should be safe to use in patients with stone undergoing anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0466","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Current American Urological Association guidelines recommend that patients with acute obstructive kidney stone requiring continuous anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy should not be treated by shockwave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy because of the risk of catastrophic renal hemorrhage possible with those techniques. Currently, ureteroscopy is the only recommended surgical treatment. We evaluated if burst wave lithotripsy (BWL) could be used in these cases by treating pigs with BWL while undergoing anticoagulation therapy. Materials and Methods: Six pigs (31-37 kg) were given 200 units/kg porcine heparin, and then the right kidney of each animal was treated with a dose of BWL (18,000 ultrasound pulses at 10 Hz, 20 cycles/pulse, peak positive pressure of 12 MPa) known to fracture kidney stones. The contralateral kidney served as a control. Therapeutic anticoagulation was confirmed by evaluating activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Microhematuria was checked by urine test strips. Kidneys were subsequently evaluated for hemorrhagic injury via MRI. Results: aPTT was significantly elevated (>100 seconds) throughout the entire treatment period (p = <0.001) indicating therapeutic anticoagulation. Gross hematuria was not observed in any of the pigs. After BWL, microhematuria averaged 145.8 red blood cells (RBC)/μL in the BWL-treated kidney and 48 RBC/μL in the control kidneys, and there was no statistically significant difference noted in microhematuria rates between the two groups (p = 0.16). Hemorrhagic injury measured only 0.10 ± 0.02% of the tissue in the BWL-treated kidneys and 0.12 ± 0.04% in the control side, with a paired difference of -0.03 ± 0.05%, showing no significant difference (p = 0.58). Conclusions: A typical clinical dose of BWL causes no hemorrhagic injury to the kidney even during therapeutic anticoagulation therapy. This result suggests that BWL should be safe to use in patients with stone undergoing anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy.

治疗性抗凝猪用破波碎石治疗肾脏未见损伤。
导读:目前美国泌尿学会指南建议需要持续抗凝/抗血小板治疗的急性梗阻性肾结石患者不应采用冲击波碎石或经皮肾镜取石术,因为这些技术可能存在灾难性肾出血的风险。目前,输尿管镜检查是唯一推荐的手术治疗方法。我们通过对猪进行抗凝治疗的同时进行burst wave lithotripsy (BWL)来评估是否可以在这些病例中使用。材料与方法:6头猪(31-37 kg)给予200单位/kg的猪肝素,然后每只动物右肾给予已知剂量的BWL (10 Hz, 20周期/脉冲,1.8万个超声脉冲,峰值正压为12 MPa)治疗,可导致肾结石破裂。对侧肾脏作为对照。通过评估活化的部分凝血活素时间(aPTT)来证实抗凝治疗。用尿试纸检查微量血尿。随后通过MRI评估肾脏出血性损伤。结果:aPTT在整个治疗期间显著升高(>100秒)(p = p = 0.16)。出血性损伤在bwl组仅为0.10±0.02%,对照组为0.12±0.04%,配对差异为-0.03±0.05%,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.58)。结论:典型临床剂量的BWL即使在抗凝治疗期间也不会对肾脏造成出血性损伤。这一结果表明BWL在接受抗凝/抗血小板治疗的结石患者中应该是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信