Shaping Ability of XP-Endo Shaper Files With Extended Use Time and R40 Blue in Oval Canals: A Microcomputed Tomography Study in Contralateral Premolars.
{"title":"Shaping Ability of XP-Endo Shaper Files With Extended Use Time and R40 Blue in Oval Canals: A Microcomputed Tomography Study in Contralateral Premolars.","authors":"Leonardo Pinto Fontes, Flávia Galvão Cândido, Marília Fagury Videira Marceliano-Alves, Evaldo de Aguiar Braga, Raissa Faria Andrade, Morgana Figueiredo Gonçalves, Élida Boaventura Mendes, Marcos Roberto Dos Santos Frozoni","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated the shaping ability of the single-file XP-endo Shaper (XP-S) system, employing an extended working time, and the Reciproc Blue number 40/.06 (REC) instrument during the preparation of oval-shaped canals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven pairs of contralateral premolars with a single canal were divided into two groups (n = 11) according to the canal preparation protocol: XP-S (with an additional 45 seconds of instrumentation) and REC. Microcomputed tomography images captured before and after preparation were analyzed to assess morphometric measurements (prepared volume/area and unprepared canal walls at 10 mm and 4 mm from the foramen), centroid deviation (at 10 mm), dentin thickness with mesial or distal deviation, and canal-to-root ratio (at 1, 5, and 10 mm from the foramen).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, root canal preparation significantly altered all tested parameters across all evaluated cross-sections (P<sub>Intra</sub> ≤ 0.003). No significant differences were observed between the groups in canal centralization, volume or surface area increase at 10 mm or 4 mm, nor in the number of unprepared canal walls at 10 mm. However, the REC system showed a greater reduction in unprepared walls in the critical apical zone (P<sub>Inter</sub> = 0.047). The XP-S group exhibited greater reductions in mesial (P<sub>Inter</sub> = 0.007) and distal (P<sub>Inter</sub> = 0.028) dentin thickness at 1 mm from the foramen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The REC instrument prepared more root canal walls than the XP-S system and promoted greater dentin preservation in the apical zone.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.01.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluated the shaping ability of the single-file XP-endo Shaper (XP-S) system, employing an extended working time, and the Reciproc Blue number 40/.06 (REC) instrument during the preparation of oval-shaped canals.
Methods: Eleven pairs of contralateral premolars with a single canal were divided into two groups (n = 11) according to the canal preparation protocol: XP-S (with an additional 45 seconds of instrumentation) and REC. Microcomputed tomography images captured before and after preparation were analyzed to assess morphometric measurements (prepared volume/area and unprepared canal walls at 10 mm and 4 mm from the foramen), centroid deviation (at 10 mm), dentin thickness with mesial or distal deviation, and canal-to-root ratio (at 1, 5, and 10 mm from the foramen).
Results: In both groups, root canal preparation significantly altered all tested parameters across all evaluated cross-sections (PIntra ≤ 0.003). No significant differences were observed between the groups in canal centralization, volume or surface area increase at 10 mm or 4 mm, nor in the number of unprepared canal walls at 10 mm. However, the REC system showed a greater reduction in unprepared walls in the critical apical zone (PInter = 0.047). The XP-S group exhibited greater reductions in mesial (PInter = 0.007) and distal (PInter = 0.028) dentin thickness at 1 mm from the foramen.
Conclusions: The REC instrument prepared more root canal walls than the XP-S system and promoted greater dentin preservation in the apical zone.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.