Electroencephalography in Clinical Practice: Neurology Professionals' Views on Optimal Standards of Care.

Abstract

Purpose: Delivering optimal care to patients with seizures and epilepsy requires all EEGs to be interpreted accurately and reliably. This study investigated neurology professionals' opinions on the ideal standards for EEG in clinical care.

Methods: We developed an anonymous e-survey targeting practicing and trainee neurologists focused on participants' demographics, clinical practice characteristics, and views on optimal EEG standards of care-including whether an EEG certification test is needed and whether postresidency/fellowship training in EEG/epilepsy is necessary for neurologists who interpret outpatient/routine EEGs in practice. The survey was hosted by the Neurology Clinical Practice-Practice Current, and it was distributed online through the American Academy of Neurology, American Epilepsy Society, American Clinical Neurophysiology Society, and International League Against Epilepsy, and through social media.

Results: Two hundred eighty-three responses were included: 119 from EEG/epilepsy-trained neurologists, 83 from non-EEG/epilepsy-trained neurologists, 75 from trainees, and 6 from advanced care providers. Most participants (78%) agreed that "an objective certification test of ability to interpret EEGs is needed for all those who interpret EEGs in clinical practice." Most participants (71%) believed that outpatient/routine EEGs may be read only by neurologists with EEG/epilepsy training; this opinion was more prevalent among EEG/epilepsy-trained (83%) versus non-EEG/epilepsy-trained neurologists (55%).

Conclusions: Our neurology community should discuss the need to develop and implement a certification test of ability for all neurologists who wish to interpret EEGs in clinical practice. In addition, it is imperative to improve in-residency EEG education to ensure that neurology graduates achieve EEG competence before entering the workforce.