Non-language neuropsychological measures increase sensitivity of identifying language reorganization in patients with epilepsy: a pilot study.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Marielle Nagele, Zerrin Yetkin, Kenneth Chase Bailey, David Denney, Thomas O'neil, Sasha Alick, Roderick McColl, Jason A D Smith
{"title":"Non-language neuropsychological measures increase sensitivity of identifying language reorganization in patients with epilepsy: a pilot study.","authors":"Marielle Nagele, Zerrin Yetkin, Kenneth Chase Bailey, David Denney, Thomas O'neil, Sasha Alick, Roderick McColl, Jason A D Smith","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2451320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine neuropsychological characteristic differences between typical and atypical language dominance in adult persons with epilepsy (PWE) and mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), including exploring the impact of selected clinical variables on detection of atypical language and neuropsychological performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with intractable epilepsy and MTS (<i>n</i> = 39) underwent comprehensive, pre-surgical evaluation including fMRI and neuropsychological assessment. Participants with concordant lateralization of MTS and seizure onset were included. Participants were grouped by dichotomized typical or atypical language lateralization based on fMRI results. Neuropsychological performance and other relevant clinical variables of the aforementioned groups were then compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those with atypical language demonstrated poorer performance across neuropsychological tasks as compared to those with typical language lateralization. Although, typical neuropsychological measures used to evaluate language lateralization were not among those significantly different between the groups. Differences in neuropsychological performance were particularly pronounced on TMT A, TMT B, Stroop (Color), GPB (Dominant), and GPB (Non-Dominant). ROC Curve was provided to evaluate reproducibility at different thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study revealed those with atypical language lateralization demonstrated greater cognitive dysfunction across neuropsychological tasks than those with typical language lateralization. Neuropsychological measures outside of the domain of language tests detected subtle changes of functional neuroanatomical reorganization while language domain tasks revealed no significant differences between aforementioned groups in pre-surgical evaluation of PWE. While these preliminary results require further replication, these are important implications for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2451320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine neuropsychological characteristic differences between typical and atypical language dominance in adult persons with epilepsy (PWE) and mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), including exploring the impact of selected clinical variables on detection of atypical language and neuropsychological performance.

Methods: Adults with intractable epilepsy and MTS (n = 39) underwent comprehensive, pre-surgical evaluation including fMRI and neuropsychological assessment. Participants with concordant lateralization of MTS and seizure onset were included. Participants were grouped by dichotomized typical or atypical language lateralization based on fMRI results. Neuropsychological performance and other relevant clinical variables of the aforementioned groups were then compared.

Results: Those with atypical language demonstrated poorer performance across neuropsychological tasks as compared to those with typical language lateralization. Although, typical neuropsychological measures used to evaluate language lateralization were not among those significantly different between the groups. Differences in neuropsychological performance were particularly pronounced on TMT A, TMT B, Stroop (Color), GPB (Dominant), and GPB (Non-Dominant). ROC Curve was provided to evaluate reproducibility at different thresholds.

Conclusion: This pilot study revealed those with atypical language lateralization demonstrated greater cognitive dysfunction across neuropsychological tasks than those with typical language lateralization. Neuropsychological measures outside of the domain of language tests detected subtle changes of functional neuroanatomical reorganization while language domain tasks revealed no significant differences between aforementioned groups in pre-surgical evaluation of PWE. While these preliminary results require further replication, these are important implications for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation.

非语言神经心理学测量增加识别癫痫患者语言重组的敏感性:一项试点研究。
目的:探讨成人癫痫(PWE)和中颞叶硬化症(MTS)患者典型和非典型语言优势的神经心理特征差异,包括部分临床变量对非典型语言和神经心理表现检测的影响。方法:对39例成人顽固性癫痫合并MTS患者进行术前综合评估,包括功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和神经心理学评估。包括MTS侧化和癫痫发作一致的参与者。参与者根据功能磁共振成像结果分为典型或非典型语言侧化。然后比较上述两组的神经心理表现和其他相关临床变量。结果:那些非典型语言的人在神经心理任务中的表现比那些典型语言偏侧的人差。然而,用于评估语言侧化的典型神经心理学测量在两组之间并没有显著差异。在TMT A、TMT B、Stroop (Color)、GPB (Dominant)和GPB (Non-Dominant)上,神经心理表现的差异尤为明显。提供ROC曲线评价不同阈值下的再现性。结论:本初步研究显示非典型语言侧化患者在神经心理任务中表现出比典型语言侧化患者更大的认知功能障碍。语言测试领域外的神经心理学测量检测到功能神经解剖重组的细微变化,而语言领域任务显示上述组在术前评估PWE方面没有显着差异。虽然这些初步结果需要进一步的复制,但这些对诊断和预后评估具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信