Reflections of Foster Youth Engaging in the Co-Design of Digital Mental Health Technology: Duoethnography Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ifunanya Ezimora, Tylia Lundberg, Dylan Miars, Jeruel Trujeque, Ashley Papias, Margareth V Del Cid, Johanna B Folk, Marina Tolou-Shams
{"title":"Reflections of Foster Youth Engaging in the Co-Design of Digital Mental Health Technology: Duoethnography Study.","authors":"Ifunanya Ezimora, Tylia Lundberg, Dylan Miars, Jeruel Trujeque, Ashley Papias, Margareth V Del Cid, Johanna B Folk, Marina Tolou-Shams","doi":"10.2196/53231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current research on digital applications to support the mental health and well-being of foster youth is limited to theoretical applications for transition-aged foster youth and support platforms developed without intentional input from foster youth themselves. Centering the lived expertise of foster youth in digital solutions is crucial to dismantling barriers to care, leading to an increase in service access and improving mental health outcomes. Co-design centers the intended end users during the design process, creating a direct relationship between potential users and developers. This methodology holds promise for creating tools centered on foster youth, yet little is known about the co-design experience for foster youth. Understanding foster youth's experience with co-design is crucial to identifying best practices, knowledge of which is currently limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this paper is to reflect on the experiences of 4 foster youth involved in the co-design of FostrSpace, a mobile app designed through a collaboration among foster youth in the San Francisco Bay Area; clinicians and academics from the Juvenile Justice Behavioral Health research team at the University of California, San Francisco; and Chorus Innovations, a rapid technology development platform specializing in participatory design practices. Key recommendations for co-designing with foster youth were generated with reference to these reflections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A duoethnography study was conducted over a 1-month period with the 4 transition-aged former foster youth co-designers of FostrSpace via written reflections and a single in-person roundtable discussion. Reflections were coded and analyzed via reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4 main themes were identified from coding of the duoethnography reflections: power and control, resource navigation, building community and safe spaces, and identity. Themes of power and control and resource navigation highlighted the challenges FostrSpace co-designers experienced trying to access basic needs, support from caregivers, and mental health resources as foster youth and former foster youth. Discussions pertaining to building community and safe spaces highlighted the positive effect of foster youth communities on co-designers, and discussions related to identity revealed the complexities associated with understanding and embracing foster youth identity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This duoethnography study highlights the importance of centering the lived expertise of co-designers throughout the app development process. As the digital health field increasingly shifts toward using co-design methods to develop digital mental health technologies for underserved youth populations, we offer recommendations for researchers seeking to ethically and effectively engage youth co-designers. Actively reflecting throughout the co-design process, finding creative ways to engage in power-sharing practices to build community, and ensuring mutual benefit among co-designers are some of the recommended core components to address when co-designing behavioral health technologies for youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e53231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current research on digital applications to support the mental health and well-being of foster youth is limited to theoretical applications for transition-aged foster youth and support platforms developed without intentional input from foster youth themselves. Centering the lived expertise of foster youth in digital solutions is crucial to dismantling barriers to care, leading to an increase in service access and improving mental health outcomes. Co-design centers the intended end users during the design process, creating a direct relationship between potential users and developers. This methodology holds promise for creating tools centered on foster youth, yet little is known about the co-design experience for foster youth. Understanding foster youth's experience with co-design is crucial to identifying best practices, knowledge of which is currently limited.

Objective: The aim of this paper is to reflect on the experiences of 4 foster youth involved in the co-design of FostrSpace, a mobile app designed through a collaboration among foster youth in the San Francisco Bay Area; clinicians and academics from the Juvenile Justice Behavioral Health research team at the University of California, San Francisco; and Chorus Innovations, a rapid technology development platform specializing in participatory design practices. Key recommendations for co-designing with foster youth were generated with reference to these reflections.

Methods: A duoethnography study was conducted over a 1-month period with the 4 transition-aged former foster youth co-designers of FostrSpace via written reflections and a single in-person roundtable discussion. Reflections were coded and analyzed via reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: In total, 4 main themes were identified from coding of the duoethnography reflections: power and control, resource navigation, building community and safe spaces, and identity. Themes of power and control and resource navigation highlighted the challenges FostrSpace co-designers experienced trying to access basic needs, support from caregivers, and mental health resources as foster youth and former foster youth. Discussions pertaining to building community and safe spaces highlighted the positive effect of foster youth communities on co-designers, and discussions related to identity revealed the complexities associated with understanding and embracing foster youth identity.

Conclusions: This duoethnography study highlights the importance of centering the lived expertise of co-designers throughout the app development process. As the digital health field increasingly shifts toward using co-design methods to develop digital mental health technologies for underserved youth populations, we offer recommendations for researchers seeking to ethically and effectively engage youth co-designers. Actively reflecting throughout the co-design process, finding creative ways to engage in power-sharing practices to build community, and ensuring mutual benefit among co-designers are some of the recommended core components to address when co-designing behavioral health technologies for youth.

寄养青年参与数字心理健康技术协同设计的思考:多民族志研究。
背景:目前关于数字应用支持寄养青年心理健康和福祉的研究仅限于过渡年龄寄养青年的理论应用和支持平台的开发,而没有寄养青年自己的有意投入。在数字解决方案中集中培养青年的实际专业知识,对于消除护理障碍、增加获得服务的机会和改善心理健康结果至关重要。协同设计在设计过程中以预期的最终用户为中心,在潜在用户和开发人员之间建立直接关系。这种方法为创造以培养青少年为中心的工具提供了希望,但对培养青少年的共同设计经验知之甚少。了解青少年在共同设计方面的经验对于确定最佳实践至关重要,目前对最佳实践的了解有限。目的:本文的目的是反思4名寄养青年参与共同设计的FostrSpace的经验,这是一款由旧金山湾区寄养青年合作设计的移动应用程序;加州大学旧金山分校青少年司法行为健康研究小组的临床医生和学者;Chorus Innovations是专门从事参与式设计实践的快速技术开发平台。参考这些反思,产生了与寄养青年共同设计的关键建议。方法:在为期1个月的时间里,通过书面反思和一次面对面的圆桌讨论,对4名过渡年龄的前寄养青年共同设计师进行了一项多民族志研究。通过反身性主题分析对反思进行编码和分析。结果:通过对多元民族志反思的编码,共确定了权力与控制、资源导航、社区与安全空间建设、身份认同等4个主题。权力和控制以及资源导航的主题突出了作为寄养青年和前寄养青年,FostrSpace的共同设计师在试图获得基本需求、照顾者的支持和心理健康资源方面所经历的挑战。关于建立社区和安全空间的讨论强调了培养青年社区对共同设计师的积极影响,关于身份的讨论揭示了理解和接受培养青年身份的复杂性。结论:这项多民族志研究强调了在整个应用开发过程中以共同设计师的生活经验为中心的重要性。随着数字健康领域越来越多地转向使用共同设计方法为服务不足的青年人群开发数字心理健康技术,我们为寻求道德和有效地吸引青年共同设计师的研究人员提供建议。在共同设计青少年行为健康技术时,建议在整个共同设计过程中积极反思,寻找创造性的方式参与权力分享实践以建立社区,并确保共同设计师之间的互惠互利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信