Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Use of Helicopter Transport After Severe Trauma in the US.

IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Christian Mpody, Maíra I Rudolph, Alexandra Bastien, Ibraheem M Karaye, Tracey Straker, Felix Borngaesser, Matthias Eikermann, Olubukola O Nafiu
{"title":"Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Use of Helicopter Transport After Severe Trauma in the US.","authors":"Christian Mpody, Maíra I Rudolph, Alexandra Bastien, Ibraheem M Karaye, Tracey Straker, Felix Borngaesser, Matthias Eikermann, Olubukola O Nafiu","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>In the US, traumatic injuries are a leading cause of mortality across all age groups. Patients with severe trauma often require time-sensitive, specialized medical care to reduce mortality; air transport is associated with improved survival in many cases. However, it is unknown whether the provision of and access to air transport are influenced by factors extrinsic to medical needs, such as race or ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the current trends of racial and ethnic disparities in air transport use for patients who sustain severe trauma.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This population-based cohort study used data from the National Trauma Data Bank from 2016 to 2022. Participants were patients older than 15 years who sustained a severe injury and required an urgent surgical procedure or intensive care unit (ICU) admission at level I or II trauma centers with helicopter service.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Severe injury requiring treatment at a level I or II trauma center.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary mode of transport, categorized as either helicopter ambulance or ground ambulance. A multifaceted approach was used to narrow the observed racial and ethnic disparities in helicopter deployment. The secondary outcome was mortality after helicopter transport vs ground ambulance transport.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were included for 341 286 patients at 458 level I or II trauma centers with helicopter service. Their mean (SD) age was 47 (20) years; 243 936 patients (71.6%) were male and 96 633 (28.4%) female. Asian individuals were less likely to receive helicopter transport compared with White individuals (6.8% vs 21.8%; aRR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.30-0.48; P < .001), driven by lower use for Asian patients in teaching hospitals (aRR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.21-0.40; P < .001) and level I trauma centers (aRR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.24-0.44; P < .001). In addition, Black patients were less likely to receive helicopter transport (8.7% vs 21.8%; aRR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.36-0.49; P < .001), particularly in teaching hospitals (aRR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33-0.50; P < .001) and level I trauma centers (aRR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.34-0.49; P < .001). A similar but less pronounced disparity was noted for Hispanic patients. Helicopter transport was associated with a lower mortality risk compared with ground transport (37.7% vs 42.6%; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85-0.89; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>This study found that racial and ethnic minority patients, particularly Asian and Black patients, and notably those treated at level I teaching hospitals were less likely to receive airlift services compared with White patients. The current expansion of helicopter emergency medical services has yet to translate into equitable care for patients of all races and ethnicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: In the US, traumatic injuries are a leading cause of mortality across all age groups. Patients with severe trauma often require time-sensitive, specialized medical care to reduce mortality; air transport is associated with improved survival in many cases. However, it is unknown whether the provision of and access to air transport are influenced by factors extrinsic to medical needs, such as race or ethnicity.

Objective: To examine the current trends of racial and ethnic disparities in air transport use for patients who sustain severe trauma.

Design, setting, and participants: This population-based cohort study used data from the National Trauma Data Bank from 2016 to 2022. Participants were patients older than 15 years who sustained a severe injury and required an urgent surgical procedure or intensive care unit (ICU) admission at level I or II trauma centers with helicopter service.

Exposure: Severe injury requiring treatment at a level I or II trauma center.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary mode of transport, categorized as either helicopter ambulance or ground ambulance. A multifaceted approach was used to narrow the observed racial and ethnic disparities in helicopter deployment. The secondary outcome was mortality after helicopter transport vs ground ambulance transport.

Results: Data were included for 341 286 patients at 458 level I or II trauma centers with helicopter service. Their mean (SD) age was 47 (20) years; 243 936 patients (71.6%) were male and 96 633 (28.4%) female. Asian individuals were less likely to receive helicopter transport compared with White individuals (6.8% vs 21.8%; aRR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.30-0.48; P < .001), driven by lower use for Asian patients in teaching hospitals (aRR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.21-0.40; P < .001) and level I trauma centers (aRR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.24-0.44; P < .001). In addition, Black patients were less likely to receive helicopter transport (8.7% vs 21.8%; aRR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.36-0.49; P < .001), particularly in teaching hospitals (aRR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33-0.50; P < .001) and level I trauma centers (aRR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.34-0.49; P < .001). A similar but less pronounced disparity was noted for Hispanic patients. Helicopter transport was associated with a lower mortality risk compared with ground transport (37.7% vs 42.6%; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85-0.89; P < .001).

Conclusion and relevance: This study found that racial and ethnic minority patients, particularly Asian and Black patients, and notably those treated at level I teaching hospitals were less likely to receive airlift services compared with White patients. The current expansion of helicopter emergency medical services has yet to translate into equitable care for patients of all races and ethnicities.

美国严重创伤后直升机运输的种族和民族差异。
重要性:在美国,创伤性损伤是所有年龄组死亡的主要原因。严重创伤患者往往需要时间敏感的专门医疗护理,以降低死亡率;在许多情况下,航空运输与提高生存率有关。然而,尚不清楚航空运输的提供和获得是否受到医疗需求以外的因素,如种族或族裔的影响。目的:探讨目前严重创伤患者乘坐航空运输的种族差异趋势。设计、环境和参与者:这项基于人群的队列研究使用了2016年至2022年国家创伤数据库的数据。参与者是年龄大于15岁的严重损伤患者,需要紧急外科手术或在有直升机服务的一级或二级创伤中心重症监护病房(ICU)住院。暴露:严重受伤,需要在一级或二级创伤中心治疗。主要结果和措施:主要运输方式,分为直升机救护车和地面救护车。采用了多方面的方法来缩小在直升机部署中观察到的种族和民族差异。次要结果是直升机运输与地面救护车运输后的死亡率。结果:纳入了458个有直升机服务的一级或二级创伤中心341 286例患者的数据。平均(SD)年龄47(20)岁;243例 936例(71.6%)男性,96例 633例(28.4%)女性。与白人相比,亚洲人接受直升机运输的可能性更低(6.8%对21.8%;加勒比海盗,0.38;95% ci, 0.30-0.48;结论和相关性:本研究发现,与白人患者相比,种族和少数民族患者,特别是亚洲和黑人患者,特别是在一级教学医院接受治疗的患者接受空运服务的可能性较小。目前直升机紧急医疗服务的扩大尚未转化为对所有种族和族裔患者的公平护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信