Application of Surgical Protocols for the Treatment of Highly Irregular Astigmatism with Topographic Guided Ablation in a Case of Post-LASIK Ectasia.

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Medical Case Reports Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IMCRJ.S476407
Manoj Motwani, Emmanuel Agu, Albert Xu, Madeline Yung
{"title":"Application of Surgical Protocols for the Treatment of Highly Irregular Astigmatism with Topographic Guided Ablation in a Case of Post-LASIK Ectasia.","authors":"Manoj Motwani, Emmanuel Agu, Albert Xu, Madeline Yung","doi":"10.2147/IMCRJ.S476407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the outcomes of two different surgical planning strategies for topography-guided repair of post-LASIK ectasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case report of a patient presenting with post-LASIK ectasia. A retrospective chart review was used to collect details of the ophthalmic exam, as well as ocular imaging such as anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug corneal tomography. Treatment planning was performed initially with the Phorcides analytical engine, and then an enhancement was performed with the LYRA/San Diego Protocol. Epithelium-off corneal cross-linking was performed at 3.0 mW/cm for 30 minutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient initially presented with a remote history of LASIK and progressive left eye blurring. His uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/40, with a corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/25 with a manifest refraction of -1.25 +1.75 × 180. His central corneal thickness was 529 μm, and corneal topography/tomography demonstrated inferior steepening of the left eye consistent with post-LASIK ectasia. He underwent simultaneous PRK and epithelium-off corneal cross-linking with a treatment plan by Phorcides of -0.14 -0.87 × 001. His vision stabilized at post-operative month 7 to a UDVA 20/40, CDVA 20/20, and manifest refraction of -2.75 +3.50 × 005. He underwent PRK enhancement with a treatment plan by the San Diego Protocol of +0.00 -1.15 × 094, with an outcome of UDVA 20/20, CDVA 20/20, and manifest refraction of -1.00 +0.75 × 174.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LYRA/San Diego Protocol outperformed Phorcides in a case of corneal ectasia. With appropriate planning, patients with irregular corneas can achieve excellent refractive outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14337,"journal":{"name":"International Medical Case Reports Journal","volume":"18 ","pages":"91-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Medical Case Reports Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S476407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of two different surgical planning strategies for topography-guided repair of post-LASIK ectasia.

Methods: This is a case report of a patient presenting with post-LASIK ectasia. A retrospective chart review was used to collect details of the ophthalmic exam, as well as ocular imaging such as anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug corneal tomography. Treatment planning was performed initially with the Phorcides analytical engine, and then an enhancement was performed with the LYRA/San Diego Protocol. Epithelium-off corneal cross-linking was performed at 3.0 mW/cm for 30 minutes.

Results: The patient initially presented with a remote history of LASIK and progressive left eye blurring. His uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/40, with a corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/25 with a manifest refraction of -1.25 +1.75 × 180. His central corneal thickness was 529 μm, and corneal topography/tomography demonstrated inferior steepening of the left eye consistent with post-LASIK ectasia. He underwent simultaneous PRK and epithelium-off corneal cross-linking with a treatment plan by Phorcides of -0.14 -0.87 × 001. His vision stabilized at post-operative month 7 to a UDVA 20/40, CDVA 20/20, and manifest refraction of -2.75 +3.50 × 005. He underwent PRK enhancement with a treatment plan by the San Diego Protocol of +0.00 -1.15 × 094, with an outcome of UDVA 20/20, CDVA 20/20, and manifest refraction of -1.00 +0.75 × 174.

Conclusion: The LYRA/San Diego Protocol outperformed Phorcides in a case of corneal ectasia. With appropriate planning, patients with irregular corneas can achieve excellent refractive outcomes.

地形引导消融治疗高度不规则散光一例lasik术后扩张手术方案的应用。
目的:比较两种不同的手术计划策略在地形引导下修复lasik术后扩张的效果。方法:这是一个病例报告的病人提出后lasik扩张。我们采用回顾性图表来收集眼科检查的细节,以及眼部成像,如前段光学相干断层扫描和Scheimpflug角膜断层扫描。最初使用Phorcides分析引擎进行处理计划,然后使用LYRA/San Diego方案进行增强。在3.0 mW/cm下进行30分钟的角膜上皮间交联。结果:患者最初有LASIK的长期病史和进行性左眼模糊。未矫正距离视力(UDVA)为20/40,矫正距离视力(CDVA)为20/25,明显屈光度为-1.25 +1.75 × 180。他的角膜中央厚度为529 μm,角膜地形图/断层扫描显示左眼下陡度与lasik术后扩张一致。同时行PRK和角膜上皮脱落交联,Phorcides的治疗方案为-0.14 -0.87 × 001。术后第7个月视力稳定,UDVA 20/40, CDVA 20/20,明显屈光度-2.75 +3.50 × 005。患者接受了PRK增强治疗,治疗方案为圣地亚哥方案+0.00 -1.15 × 094, UDVA 20/20, CDVA 20/20,明显屈光为-1.00 +0.75 × 174。结论:LYRA/San Diego方案优于Phorcides治疗一例角膜扩张。通过适当的计划,不规则角膜患者可以获得良好的屈光效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Medical Case Reports Journal
International Medical Case Reports Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: International Medical Case Reports Journal is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal publishing original case reports from all medical specialties. Submissions should not normally exceed 3,000 words or 4 published pages including figures, diagrams and references. As of 1st April 2019, the International Medical Case Reports Journal will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信