Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in managing localized adrenocortical carcinoma treatment: A retrospective propensity-matched study.
{"title":"Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in managing localized adrenocortical carcinoma treatment: A retrospective propensity-matched study.","authors":"Xin Zhao, Jiaquan Zhou, Xiaohong Lyu, Yanan Li, Yihong Liu, Yushi Zhang","doi":"10.1111/iju.15678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It was controversial to use open surgery or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact on prognosis between MIS and open surgery in patients with clinical stage I-II ACC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with stage I-II ACC from December 2000 to October 2022 were retrospectively studied. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival time calculated by the Kaplan-Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 95 patients were enrolled in this study (50 open surgery and 45 MIS). Propensity score matching identified 32 matched pairs of patients. Compared with the open surgery group, the MIS group had a shorter median operative time (150.0 vs. 120.0 min, p = 0.014), the lesser median volume of intraoperative blood loss (200.0 vs. 60.0 mL, p = 0.006), lower incidence of postoperative complications (59.4% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.023), and shorter median postoperative length of hospital stay (8.0 vs. 7.0 days, p = 0.001). After a median follow-up time of 20.5 months, no significant differences were observed in the local recurrence rate (62.5% vs. 78.1%), distant metastasis rate (15.6% vs. 6.3%), and median time to recurrence (15.0 vs. 20.0 months) between the two groups. The median recurrence-free survival time between the open surgery and MIS groups did not significantly differ (16.0 vs. 21.0 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MIS might be a feasible option for treating localized ACC at a high patient's volume center with experienced surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15678","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: It was controversial to use open surgery or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact on prognosis between MIS and open surgery in patients with clinical stage I-II ACC.
Methods: Patients with stage I-II ACC from December 2000 to October 2022 were retrospectively studied. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival time calculated by the Kaplan-Meier curves.
Results: In total, 95 patients were enrolled in this study (50 open surgery and 45 MIS). Propensity score matching identified 32 matched pairs of patients. Compared with the open surgery group, the MIS group had a shorter median operative time (150.0 vs. 120.0 min, p = 0.014), the lesser median volume of intraoperative blood loss (200.0 vs. 60.0 mL, p = 0.006), lower incidence of postoperative complications (59.4% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.023), and shorter median postoperative length of hospital stay (8.0 vs. 7.0 days, p = 0.001). After a median follow-up time of 20.5 months, no significant differences were observed in the local recurrence rate (62.5% vs. 78.1%), distant metastasis rate (15.6% vs. 6.3%), and median time to recurrence (15.0 vs. 20.0 months) between the two groups. The median recurrence-free survival time between the open surgery and MIS groups did not significantly differ (16.0 vs. 21.0 months).
Conclusion: MIS might be a feasible option for treating localized ACC at a high patient's volume center with experienced surgeons.
背景:对于肾上腺皮质癌(ACC),采用开放手术还是微创手术(MIS)一直存在争议。本回顾性研究旨在评估MIS和开放手术对临床I-II期ACC患者预后的影响。方法:对2000年12月至2022年10月的I-II期ACC患者进行回顾性研究。主要终点是通过Kaplan-Meier曲线计算的无复发生存时间。结果:共纳入95例患者,其中开放手术50例,MIS 45例。倾向评分匹配确定了32对匹配的患者。与开放手术组相比,MIS组中位手术时间更短(150.0 vs. 120.0 min, p = 0.014),术中中位失血量更少(2000.0 vs. 60.0 mL, p = 0.006),术后并发症发生率更低(59.4% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.023),术后中位住院时间更短(8.0 vs. 7.0 d, p = 0.001)。中位随访20.5个月后,两组局部复发率(62.5% vs. 78.1%)、远处转移率(15.6% vs. 6.3%)和中位复发时间(15.0 vs. 20.0个月)无显著差异。开放手术组和MIS组的中位无复发生存时间无显著差异(16.0个月对21.0个月)。结论:在经验丰富的外科医生的指导下,MIS可能是治疗高容量中心局限性ACC的可行选择。
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.