Mustafa Volkan Düzgün, Cafer Özdemir, Ayşegül İşler, Ebru Karazeybek
{"title":"Technology-Based Interventions for Pain in Children Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mustafa Volkan Düzgün, Cafer Özdemir, Ayşegül İşler, Ebru Karazeybek","doi":"10.1111/ijn.13322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of technology-based interventions on the pain of paediatric surgery patients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, the number of technology-based interventions involving multimodal nonpharmacological methods tailored to pain management in paediatric surgery patients has increased. It is crucial to determine the effectiveness of these interventions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials following Cochrane methods was conducted.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>We performed a literature search in the Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, Science Direct, MEDLINE, ProQuest and Cochrane Library databases. Two independent researchers screened the literature using specific keywords and selected randomized controlled trials based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each researcher extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the randomized controlled trials using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis on 14 randomized controlled trials included in the study. The results showed that technology-based interventions reduced pain scores in paediatric surgery patients. Cochran's Q test results pointed to a high level of heterogeneity among the randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A meta-analysis result of 14 randomized controlled trials showed that technology-based interventions are effective methods for reducing pain in paediatric surgery patients.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>CRD42021226666.</p>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"e13322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.13322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of technology-based interventions on the pain of paediatric surgery patients.
Background: Recently, the number of technology-based interventions involving multimodal nonpharmacological methods tailored to pain management in paediatric surgery patients has increased. It is crucial to determine the effectiveness of these interventions.
Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials following Cochrane methods was conducted.
Review methods: We performed a literature search in the Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, Science Direct, MEDLINE, ProQuest and Cochrane Library databases. Two independent researchers screened the literature using specific keywords and selected randomized controlled trials based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each researcher extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the randomized controlled trials using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool.
Result: We conducted a meta-analysis on 14 randomized controlled trials included in the study. The results showed that technology-based interventions reduced pain scores in paediatric surgery patients. Cochran's Q test results pointed to a high level of heterogeneity among the randomized controlled trials.
Conclusion: A meta-analysis result of 14 randomized controlled trials showed that technology-based interventions are effective methods for reducing pain in paediatric surgery patients.
目的：本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估基于技术的干预措施对儿科手术患者疼痛的影响。背景：最近，针对儿科手术患者疼痛管理的多模式非药物方法的技术干预数量有所增加。确定这些干预措施的有效性至关重要。设计：采用Cochrane方法对随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们在Web of Science、PubMed、CINAHL、Science Direct、MEDLINE、ProQuest和Cochrane Library数据库中进行了文献检索。两名独立研究人员使用特定关键词筛选文献，并根据纳入和排除标准选择随机对照试验。每位研究人员提取数据并使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具评估随机对照试验的偏倚风险。结果：我们对纳入研究的14项随机对照试验进行meta分析。结果显示，以技术为基础的干预措施降低了儿科手术患者的疼痛评分。科克伦的Q检验结果指出，在随机对照试验中存在高度的异质性。结论：14项随机对照试验的荟萃分析结果表明，基于技术的干预措施是减轻儿科手术患者疼痛的有效方法。注册号：CRD42021226666。
期刊介绍：
International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
