Effects of Sensory-Based Interventions on Delirium Prevention in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Chenli Xu, Yan Zhang, Dajiang Yuan, Cuiling Wang, Xiaoru Wang, Xiaojuan Liang, Junli Wang, Junfang Duan
{"title":"Effects of Sensory-Based Interventions on Delirium Prevention in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Chenli Xu, Yan Zhang, Dajiang Yuan, Cuiling Wang, Xiaoru Wang, Xiaojuan Liang, Junli Wang, Junfang Duan","doi":"10.1111/ijn.13321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify, appraise and synthesize current evidence on different sensory-based interventions on delirium prevention in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang and WeiPu databases from inception to 2 June 2022. The data were updated on 24 December 2022. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42021254328).</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials were included. Participants in the included studies were critically ill patients aged 18 years or older, and the interventions involved care by sensory-based intervention. And the outcome was the incidence of delirium rated by the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 14 studies included in the systematic review indicated a reduction in the effectiveness of sensory-based intervention on the incidence of delirium. Subgroup analyses showed significant effects for auditory stimulation (OR, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.79; p = 0.005) and tactile stimulation (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.87; p = 0.01) but not for the effectiveness of visual intervention on the incidence of delirium (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.38-1.30; p = 0.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sensory-based interventions significantly reduce the incidence of delirium in critical patients. It is suggested that when choosing sensory-based interventions, auditory intervention should be preferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"e13321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.13321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify, appraise and synthesize current evidence on different sensory-based interventions on delirium prevention in critically ill patients.

Data sources: A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang and WeiPu databases from inception to 2 June 2022. The data were updated on 24 December 2022. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42021254328).

Review methods: Randomized controlled trials were included. Participants in the included studies were critically ill patients aged 18 years or older, and the interventions involved care by sensory-based intervention. And the outcome was the incidence of delirium rated by the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU Tool.

Results: The 14 studies included in the systematic review indicated a reduction in the effectiveness of sensory-based intervention on the incidence of delirium. Subgroup analyses showed significant effects for auditory stimulation (OR, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.79; p = 0.005) and tactile stimulation (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.87; p = 0.01) but not for the effectiveness of visual intervention on the incidence of delirium (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.38-1.30; p = 0.27).

Conclusions: Sensory-based interventions significantly reduce the incidence of delirium in critical patients. It is suggested that when choosing sensory-based interventions, auditory intervention should be preferred.

基于感觉的干预对危重患者谵妄预防的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:对危重症患者谵妄的不同感觉干预措施进行识别、评价和综合。数据来源:全面检索PubMed、Embase、护理与联合健康文献累积索引、Cochrane图书馆、中国生物医学、中国知识基础设施、万方和卫普数据库,检索时间为成立至2022年6月2日。该数据于2022年12月24日更新。该研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD 42021254328)。综述方法:采用随机对照试验。纳入研究的受试者为18岁或以上的危重患者,干预措施包括以感觉为基础的干预。以神志不清评定法评定谵妄发生率为结果。结果:系统评价中包含的14项研究表明,基于感觉的干预对谵妄发生率的有效性降低。亚组分析显示听觉刺激有显著效果(OR, 0.46;95%置信区间[CI], 0.27-0.79;p = 0.005)和触觉刺激(OR, 0.53;95% ci, 0.33-0.87;p = 0.01),但视觉干预对谵妄发生率的影响无统计学意义(OR, 0.71;95% ci, 0.38-1.30;p = 0.27)。结论:以感觉为基础的干预可显著降低危重患者谵妄的发生率。建议在选择以感觉为基础的干预措施时,应优先考虑听觉干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信