Idiopathic Retroperitoneal Fibrosis-Related Hydronephrosis: Evaluation of Comprehensive Management and Prediction of Inflammatory Markers for Stent-Free Outcomes.
Zixiong Huang, Yanying Liu, Yunshu Xiao, Hao Hu, Tao Xu
{"title":"Idiopathic Retroperitoneal Fibrosis-Related Hydronephrosis: Evaluation of Comprehensive Management and Prediction of Inflammatory Markers for Stent-Free Outcomes.","authors":"Zixiong Huang, Yanying Liu, Yunshu Xiao, Hao Hu, Tao Xu","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S490245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the efficacy of comprehensive management and predictable inflammatory markers for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (iRPF)-related hydronephrosis outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with iRPF-related hydronephrosis underwent surgical (ureteral stent and/or nephrostomy tube placement) and medical (corticosteroid-based multiple immunosuppressants) management were classified according to stent-indwelling outcomes. Univariate analysis of clinical profiles was conducted to screen possible predictors of hydronephrosis remission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a series of 38 patients, 52.6% achieved hydronephrosis remission and stent/tube removal (stent-free group). The median indwelling time in the stent-free group (12 months) was significantly lower than that in the treatment-failure group (37 months, <i>p</i><0.05). Mean retroperitoneal mass diameters was significantly reduced (anteroposterior by 11.66 mm (95% CI 2.31-21.01), transverse by 15.41 mm (95% CI 3.37-27.46), suprainferior by 30.53 mm (95% CI 4.87-56.19); <i>p</i><0.05) during the treatment course, in line with mean renal pelvis width (by 36.2%) and renal function parameters (serum creatinine by 16.9%, blood urea nitrogen by 12.9%). Renal function improved (36.9%) or remained stable (44.7%) in most patients, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate increasing by 8.7% (from 55.4 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> to 60.2 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>). At the initial diagnosis, median serum immunoglobulin IgG and CRP levels were significantly higher in the stent-free group than in the treatment-failure group (IgG 17.55 g/L vs. 13.50 g/L, CRP 19.60 mg/L vs. 3.15 mg/L; <i>p</i><0.05). Decline in serum IgG (-5.80 g/L vs. -2.30 g/L), CRP (-18.93 mg/L vs. -1.72 mg/L) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (-22.00 mm/h vs. -1.50 mm/h) levels in the stent-free group surpassed those in the treatment-failure group (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comprehensive management benefits iRPF patients with hydronephrosis by preserving renal function. The 24-month scale might guide stent/tube removal. Elevated inflammatory markers (IgG and CRP) at the initial iRPF diagnosis and IgG, CRP, and erythrocyte sedimentationrate (ESR) variations associated with hydronephrosis outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"113-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S490245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated the efficacy of comprehensive management and predictable inflammatory markers for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (iRPF)-related hydronephrosis outcomes.
Methods: Patients with iRPF-related hydronephrosis underwent surgical (ureteral stent and/or nephrostomy tube placement) and medical (corticosteroid-based multiple immunosuppressants) management were classified according to stent-indwelling outcomes. Univariate analysis of clinical profiles was conducted to screen possible predictors of hydronephrosis remission.
Results: In a series of 38 patients, 52.6% achieved hydronephrosis remission and stent/tube removal (stent-free group). The median indwelling time in the stent-free group (12 months) was significantly lower than that in the treatment-failure group (37 months, p<0.05). Mean retroperitoneal mass diameters was significantly reduced (anteroposterior by 11.66 mm (95% CI 2.31-21.01), transverse by 15.41 mm (95% CI 3.37-27.46), suprainferior by 30.53 mm (95% CI 4.87-56.19); p<0.05) during the treatment course, in line with mean renal pelvis width (by 36.2%) and renal function parameters (serum creatinine by 16.9%, blood urea nitrogen by 12.9%). Renal function improved (36.9%) or remained stable (44.7%) in most patients, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate increasing by 8.7% (from 55.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 to 60.2 mL/min/1.73 m2). At the initial diagnosis, median serum immunoglobulin IgG and CRP levels were significantly higher in the stent-free group than in the treatment-failure group (IgG 17.55 g/L vs. 13.50 g/L, CRP 19.60 mg/L vs. 3.15 mg/L; p<0.05). Decline in serum IgG (-5.80 g/L vs. -2.30 g/L), CRP (-18.93 mg/L vs. -1.72 mg/L) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (-22.00 mm/h vs. -1.50 mm/h) levels in the stent-free group surpassed those in the treatment-failure group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Comprehensive management benefits iRPF patients with hydronephrosis by preserving renal function. The 24-month scale might guide stent/tube removal. Elevated inflammatory markers (IgG and CRP) at the initial iRPF diagnosis and IgG, CRP, and erythrocyte sedimentationrate (ESR) variations associated with hydronephrosis outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas.
A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.