Explanatory capacity of measures of community context for paediatric injury hospitalisations in the USA.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Henry T Puls, Clemens Noelke, Kristyn N Jeffries, Daniel M Lindberg, Anna E Austin, Barbara H Chaiyachati, Matthew Hall
{"title":"Explanatory capacity of measures of community context for paediatric injury hospitalisations in the USA.","authors":"Henry T Puls, Clemens Noelke, Kristyn N Jeffries, Daniel M Lindberg, Anna E Austin, Barbara H Chaiyachati, Matthew Hall","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Community context influences children's risk for injury. We aimed to measure the explanatory capacity of two ZIP code-level measures-the Child Opportunity Index V.3.0 (COI) and median household income (MHHI)-for rates of paediatric injury hospitalisations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cross-sectional population-based study of children living in 19 US states in 2017. We examined injury hospitalisation rates for three categories: physical abuse among children <5 years, injuries suspicious for abuse among infants <12 months and unintentional injuries among children <18 years. Hospitalisation counts were obtained from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and population data from the US Census. The COI is a multidimensional measure of communities' education, health and environment and social and economic characteristics. We used pseudo R<sup>2</sup> values from Poisson regression models to describe the per cent of variance in rates of each injury category explained by the COI and MHHI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The COI explained 75.4% of the variability in rates of physical abuse, representing a 13.5% improvement over MHHI. The COI explained 58.5% of the variability in injuries suspicious for abuse, a 20.7% improvement over MHHI. The COI and MHHI explained 85.7% and 85.8% of the variability in unintentional injuries, respectively; results differed when unintentional injuries were stratified by mechanism and age.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The COI had superior explanatory capacity for physical abuse and injuries suspicious for abuse compared with MHHI and was similar for unintentional injury hospitalisations. COI represents a means of accounting for community advantage in paediatric injury data, research and prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Community context influences children's risk for injury. We aimed to measure the explanatory capacity of two ZIP code-level measures-the Child Opportunity Index V.3.0 (COI) and median household income (MHHI)-for rates of paediatric injury hospitalisations.

Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional population-based study of children living in 19 US states in 2017. We examined injury hospitalisation rates for three categories: physical abuse among children <5 years, injuries suspicious for abuse among infants <12 months and unintentional injuries among children <18 years. Hospitalisation counts were obtained from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and population data from the US Census. The COI is a multidimensional measure of communities' education, health and environment and social and economic characteristics. We used pseudo R2 values from Poisson regression models to describe the per cent of variance in rates of each injury category explained by the COI and MHHI.

Results: The COI explained 75.4% of the variability in rates of physical abuse, representing a 13.5% improvement over MHHI. The COI explained 58.5% of the variability in injuries suspicious for abuse, a 20.7% improvement over MHHI. The COI and MHHI explained 85.7% and 85.8% of the variability in unintentional injuries, respectively; results differed when unintentional injuries were stratified by mechanism and age.

Implications: The COI had superior explanatory capacity for physical abuse and injuries suspicious for abuse compared with MHHI and was similar for unintentional injury hospitalisations. COI represents a means of accounting for community advantage in paediatric injury data, research and prevention.

美国儿童伤害住院的社区背景测量的解释能力。
目的:社区环境对儿童伤害风险的影响。我们的目的是测量两个邮政编码级别的测量-儿童机会指数V.3.0 (COI)和家庭收入中位数(MHHI)-对儿科伤害住院率的解释能力。方法:这是一项基于人群的回顾性横断面研究,研究对象是2017年美国19个州的儿童。我们检查了三类伤害住院率:儿童身体虐待2泊松回归模型的值,以描述由COI和MHHI解释的每种伤害类别的发生率差异的百分比。结果:COI解释了身体虐待率变异的75.4%,比MHHI改善了13.5%。COI解释了58.5%的可疑虐待伤害的可变性,比MHHI提高了20.7%。COI和MHHI分别解释了85.7%和85.8%的意外伤害变异;当意外伤害按机制和年龄分层时,结果不同。意义:与MHHI相比,COI对身体虐待和疑似虐待的伤害有更好的解释能力,对意外伤害住院的解释能力相似。COI代表了一种计算社区在儿科伤害数据、研究和预防方面优势的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Injury Prevention
Injury Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信