Recurrent Cardiac Tamponade Following Rotablator-Associated Coronary Perforation Treated with Additional Covered Stent Implantation.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
International heart journal Pub Date : 2025-01-31 Epub Date: 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1536/ihj.24-544
Koichiro Hori, Shunsuke Matsuno, Mikio Kishi, Hiroto Kano, Junji Yajima, Yuji Oikawa
{"title":"Recurrent Cardiac Tamponade Following Rotablator-Associated Coronary Perforation Treated with Additional Covered Stent Implantation.","authors":"Koichiro Hori, Shunsuke Matsuno, Mikio Kishi, Hiroto Kano, Junji Yajima, Yuji Oikawa","doi":"10.1536/ihj.24-544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rotablator-associated coronary perforation can be fatal if bailout is delayed. Successful bailout is typically defined as the disappearance of contrast extravasation after a haemostatic intervention. We report a case of recurrent cardiac tamponade in the subacute phase, wherein haemostasis appeared to have been achieved on angiography following the implantation of a covered stent during the index procedure.A 61-year-old male underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention with a rotator placed in the middle of the left ascending artery. Coronary perforation occurred during rotablation and was treated with a covered stent. However, cardiac tamponade recurred on postoperative day 30. Emergency coronary angiography was performed, and no contrast extravasation was observed on angiography. However, intravascular ultrasonography was performed to clarify the cause of the recurrent pericardial effusion and revealed that the distal edge of the covered stent was not fully attached to the vessel wall due to protruding calcification. Another covered stent was placed distal to the previous stent for sealing the malapposed site. There was no recurrence of pericardial effusion.Malapposition of covered stents may not be detected by angiography alone, potentially resulting in recurrent bleeding. Intravascular imaging is an effective tool to confirm adequate stent apposition.</p>","PeriodicalId":13711,"journal":{"name":"International heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"179-182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rotablator-associated coronary perforation can be fatal if bailout is delayed. Successful bailout is typically defined as the disappearance of contrast extravasation after a haemostatic intervention. We report a case of recurrent cardiac tamponade in the subacute phase, wherein haemostasis appeared to have been achieved on angiography following the implantation of a covered stent during the index procedure.A 61-year-old male underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention with a rotator placed in the middle of the left ascending artery. Coronary perforation occurred during rotablation and was treated with a covered stent. However, cardiac tamponade recurred on postoperative day 30. Emergency coronary angiography was performed, and no contrast extravasation was observed on angiography. However, intravascular ultrasonography was performed to clarify the cause of the recurrent pericardial effusion and revealed that the distal edge of the covered stent was not fully attached to the vessel wall due to protruding calcification. Another covered stent was placed distal to the previous stent for sealing the malapposed site. There was no recurrence of pericardial effusion.Malapposition of covered stents may not be detected by angiography alone, potentially resulting in recurrent bleeding. Intravascular imaging is an effective tool to confirm adequate stent apposition.

旋转相关冠状动脉穿孔后复发性心包填塞加复盖支架植入。
如果救援延迟,旋转相关的冠状动脉穿孔可能是致命的。成功的救助通常被定义为止血干预后造影剂外渗消失。我们报告一个亚急性期复发性心包填塞的病例,其中血管造影显示在植入覆盖支架后止血。一位61岁男性接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,在左升动脉中间放置了一个旋转器。冠状动脉穿孔发生在旋转过程中,用覆盖支架治疗。然而,心脏填塞在术后第30天复发。急诊冠脉造影,造影未见造影剂外渗。然而,血管内超声检查明确了复发性心包积液的原因,发现覆盖支架远端边缘由于突出的钙化而未完全附着于血管壁。另一个覆盖支架放置在先前支架的远端以密封错位部位。无心包积液复发。覆盖支架的错位可能无法通过单独的血管造影检测到,这可能导致复发性出血。血管内成像是确认适当支架放置的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International heart journal
International heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Authors of research articles should disclose at the time of submission any financial arrangement they may have with a company whose product figures prominently in the submitted manuscript or with a company making a competing product. Such information will be held in confidence while the paper is under review and will not influence the editorial decision, but if the article is accepted for publication, the editors will usually discuss with the authors the manner in which such information is to be communicated to the reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信