{"title":"Sex and Cardiac Operations: Are We Being Fair to Our Female Patients?","authors":"Catherine A Fitton, Mark Woodward, Jill J F Belch","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research suggests that although men have a higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) rate, women with CVD are more likely to experience a poorer prognosis, possibly owing to incorrect diagnosis and poorer treatment. A question not yet addressed is whether some of this inequality could be due to sex bias when selecting patients for operation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The participants were from the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort who had been admitted to hospital with a cardiovascular diagnosis over the study period. Participants were recruited between 1984 and 1995 and followed up until 2017. Using propensity score nearest neighbour matching, women were matched 1:1 with men on year of birth, year and reason of admission, smoking status, previous cardiovascular disease (CVD), and family history of CVD. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 19,960 admissions (50% women) to hospital for cardiac reasons were available for analysis. Women were less likely to have a cardiac intervention, that is (endovascular or surgical revascularisation), after admission for any cardiovascular reason (6.83% of men, 2.84% of women; odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 0.42-0.75), or admission for cardiac ischaemia only (11.07% of men; 6.09% of women; OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.37-0.74). The sex difference was more pronounced in the early part of the study but persisted in the latter phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this matched study of cardiovascular admissions to Scottish hospitals, women were less likely to be recommended for a surgical procedure, even when matched with men for common CVD risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2024.09.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Research suggests that although men have a higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) rate, women with CVD are more likely to experience a poorer prognosis, possibly owing to incorrect diagnosis and poorer treatment. A question not yet addressed is whether some of this inequality could be due to sex bias when selecting patients for operation.
Method: The participants were from the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort who had been admitted to hospital with a cardiovascular diagnosis over the study period. Participants were recruited between 1984 and 1995 and followed up until 2017. Using propensity score nearest neighbour matching, women were matched 1:1 with men on year of birth, year and reason of admission, smoking status, previous cardiovascular disease (CVD), and family history of CVD. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
Results: After matching, 19,960 admissions (50% women) to hospital for cardiac reasons were available for analysis. Women were less likely to have a cardiac intervention, that is (endovascular or surgical revascularisation), after admission for any cardiovascular reason (6.83% of men, 2.84% of women; odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 0.42-0.75), or admission for cardiac ischaemia only (11.07% of men; 6.09% of women; OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.37-0.74). The sex difference was more pronounced in the early part of the study but persisted in the latter phase.
Conclusions: In this matched study of cardiovascular admissions to Scottish hospitals, women were less likely to be recommended for a surgical procedure, even when matched with men for common CVD risk factors.
背景:研究表明,尽管男性心血管疾病(CVD)发病率较高,但患有CVD的女性更有可能经历较差的预后,可能是由于不正确的诊断和较差的治疗。一个尚未解决的问题是,这种不平等是否可能是由于在选择手术患者时的性别偏见。方法:参与者来自苏格兰心脏健康扩展队列,他们在研究期间因心血管诊断而入院。参与者在1984年至1995年间被招募,并随访至2017年。使用倾向评分最近邻匹配,女性与男性在出生年份、入院年份和原因、吸烟状况、既往心血管疾病(CVD)和CVD家族史上进行1:1匹配。使用条件逻辑回归估计比值比和95%置信区间。结果:匹配后,因心脏原因入院的19,960例(50%为女性)可用于分析。女性入院后因任何心血管原因接受心脏干预(即血管内或手术血管重建)的可能性较小(男性为6.83%,女性为2.84%;优势比[OR] 0.56;95%可信区间[ci] 0.42-0.75),或仅因心脏缺血入院(11.07%的男性;女性占6.09%;或0.52;95% ci 0.37-0.74)。性别差异在研究的早期阶段更为明显,但在研究的后期仍然存在。结论:在苏格兰医院心血管入院的匹配研究中,女性不太可能被推荐进行外科手术,即使与男性匹配常见的心血管疾病危险因素。
期刊介绍:
Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.