Left ventricular rigor mortis interferes with postmortem aortic root geometry.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Jan Michael Federspiel, Karen B Abeln, Frank Ramsthaler, Thomas Tschernig, Peter H Schmidt
{"title":"Left ventricular rigor mortis interferes with postmortem aortic root geometry.","authors":"Jan Michael Federspiel, Karen B Abeln, Frank Ramsthaler, Thomas Tschernig, Peter H Schmidt","doi":"10.1007/s00414-025-03409-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aortic regurgitation is a common valve disease and can be caused by delineated findings such as fenestrations or hardly discernible alterations of the aortic root geometry. Therefore, aortic regurgitation can be a challenging diagnosis during an autopsy. Cardiac surgeons, however, are confronted with comparable problems during surgery and have developed a refined knowledge of the anatomy of the aortic root including its geometry. Transferring this knowledge from the operating room to the dissection would further complement the panel of postmortem diagnostic tools. To foster translation of the clinical anatomy, the present study assessed the impact of postmortem peculiarities (i.e. myocardial rigor mortis, putrefaction) that might influence aortic root geometry. The aortic root geometry was described by aortic perimeters (basal, sinus, sino-tubular junction, and ascending aorta), effective height (distance from the cusp's free margin to its nadir), geometric height (cusp height), commissural height (distance from the base of an interleaflet triangle to the end of a commissure), and length of the ascending aorta. Data from 140 cases were analyzed (linear regression, comparative testing). Myocardial rigor mortis was associated with smaller basal rings. Weak positive correlations between the duration of the postmortem interval and aortic root dimensions were observed. In summary, postmortem peculiarities, especially the myocardial cadaveric rigidity, influence postmortem aortic root geometry. Despite these circumstances, the current study demonstrates that aortic root geometric assessment, including effective height, is feasible in a postmortem setting. Further studies are needed to elaborate on aortic root geometry as a diagnostic tool in a necropsy setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03409-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aortic regurgitation is a common valve disease and can be caused by delineated findings such as fenestrations or hardly discernible alterations of the aortic root geometry. Therefore, aortic regurgitation can be a challenging diagnosis during an autopsy. Cardiac surgeons, however, are confronted with comparable problems during surgery and have developed a refined knowledge of the anatomy of the aortic root including its geometry. Transferring this knowledge from the operating room to the dissection would further complement the panel of postmortem diagnostic tools. To foster translation of the clinical anatomy, the present study assessed the impact of postmortem peculiarities (i.e. myocardial rigor mortis, putrefaction) that might influence aortic root geometry. The aortic root geometry was described by aortic perimeters (basal, sinus, sino-tubular junction, and ascending aorta), effective height (distance from the cusp's free margin to its nadir), geometric height (cusp height), commissural height (distance from the base of an interleaflet triangle to the end of a commissure), and length of the ascending aorta. Data from 140 cases were analyzed (linear regression, comparative testing). Myocardial rigor mortis was associated with smaller basal rings. Weak positive correlations between the duration of the postmortem interval and aortic root dimensions were observed. In summary, postmortem peculiarities, especially the myocardial cadaveric rigidity, influence postmortem aortic root geometry. Despite these circumstances, the current study demonstrates that aortic root geometric assessment, including effective height, is feasible in a postmortem setting. Further studies are needed to elaborate on aortic root geometry as a diagnostic tool in a necropsy setting.

左心室尸僵干扰了死后主动脉根部的几何形状。
主动脉反流是一种常见的瓣膜疾病,可由诸如开窗或主动脉根部几何形状的难以辨别的改变引起。因此,主动脉反流在尸检中可能是一个具有挑战性的诊断。然而,心脏外科医生在手术过程中也面临着类似的问题,并且已经对主动脉根部的解剖结构(包括其几何形状)有了详细的了解。将这些知识从手术室转移到解剖将进一步补充死后诊断工具。为了促进临床解剖学的翻译,本研究评估了可能影响主动脉根部几何形状的死后特征(如心肌尸僵、腐烂)的影响。主动脉根的几何形状由主动脉周长(基底、窦、中管交界处和升主动脉)、有效高度(从尖端自由缘到最低点的距离)、几何高度(尖端高度)、连接高度(从叶间三角形底部到连接末端的距离)和升主动脉长度来描述。对140例病例的数据进行分析(线性回归、比较检验)。心肌尸僵与较小的基环有关。死后间隔时间与主动脉根部尺寸呈弱正相关。总之,死后的特征,尤其是心肌尸体硬度,影响死后主动脉根部的几何形状。尽管存在这些情况,但目前的研究表明,主动脉根部几何评估,包括有效高度,在死后的情况下是可行的。需要进一步的研究来详细说明主动脉根部几何形状作为尸检的诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信