Effect of gestational age on clinical features in necrotizing enterocolitis-associated intestinal perforation.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2024.1452207
Minming Chen, Wei Feng, Jinping Hou, Xiaohong Die, Zhenhua Guo, Yi Wang
{"title":"Effect of gestational age on clinical features in necrotizing enterocolitis-associated intestinal perforation.","authors":"Minming Chen, Wei Feng, Jinping Hou, Xiaohong Die, Zhenhua Guo, Yi Wang","doi":"10.3389/fped.2024.1452207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the clinical features of necrotizing enterocolitis-associated intestinal perforation (NEC-IP) in neonates with different gestational ages (GAs). Furthermore, we also want to identify the risk factors of poor prognosis for these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study of patients with NEC-IP was conducted with basic information, comorbidity, intraoperative findings, related treatment, and prognosis. According to the GA, patients were divided into three groups: early (GA: 28-<32 weeks, Group 1), mid-term (GA: 32-<34 weeks, Group 2), and late (GA: 34-<37 weeks, Group 3). The clinical features of the three groups were analyzed, and risk factors for poor prognosis were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 113 cases, the number of cases in Groups 1 to 3 was 36 (31.9%), 44 (38.9%), and 33 (29.2%), respectively; and the overall proportion of poor prognosis was 19.4% (22/113). For basic information, the birth weight of Group 1 was lower than that of Group 2 and Group 3, while the postnatal day at the time of surgery of NEC and the onset age were higher than that of Group 2 (onset age: G1 12.0[7.00;20.5], G2 9.00[4.00;13.0]; postnatal day at the time of surgery: G1 22.0[13.8;27.2], G2 13.0[8.00;21.0]) (<i>P</i> < 0.016). For comorbidity, the incidence of sepsis, coagulopathy, type of (congenital heart disease) CHD, and hypoproteinemia in Group 1 was higher than that in Group 2 (all <i>P</i> < 0.016), and the incidence of respiratory failure, hypoproteinemia in Group 1 was higher than that in Group 3 (all <i>P</i> < 0.016). For related treatment, the usage rate of vasoactive substances and mechanical ventilation in Group 1 was higher than that of Group 2 and Group 3 (all <i>P</i> < 0.016). By Lasso and Logistic regression analysis, we found that GA (OR: 0.274, 95%CI: 0.078-0.796), sepsis (OR: 7.955, 95%CI: 1.424-65.21), coagulopathy (OR: 19.51, 95%CI: 3.393-179.1), CHD (OR: 6.99, 95%CI: 1.418-54.83) and diseased bowel segment (OR: 2.804, 95%CI: 1.301-7.316) were the independent factors for poor prognosis (all <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical features of NEC-IP patients differ based on GA, particularly in terms of CHD type, postnatal day at the time of surgery, utilization of vasoactive substances, and prognosis. Furthermore, GA, sepsis, coagulopathy, CHD, and diseased bowel segment are independent factors for poor prognosis of patients with NEC-IP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"12 ","pages":"1452207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1452207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the clinical features of necrotizing enterocolitis-associated intestinal perforation (NEC-IP) in neonates with different gestational ages (GAs). Furthermore, we also want to identify the risk factors of poor prognosis for these patients.

Methods: The retrospective study of patients with NEC-IP was conducted with basic information, comorbidity, intraoperative findings, related treatment, and prognosis. According to the GA, patients were divided into three groups: early (GA: 28-<32 weeks, Group 1), mid-term (GA: 32-<34 weeks, Group 2), and late (GA: 34-<37 weeks, Group 3). The clinical features of the three groups were analyzed, and risk factors for poor prognosis were identified.

Results: Of the 113 cases, the number of cases in Groups 1 to 3 was 36 (31.9%), 44 (38.9%), and 33 (29.2%), respectively; and the overall proportion of poor prognosis was 19.4% (22/113). For basic information, the birth weight of Group 1 was lower than that of Group 2 and Group 3, while the postnatal day at the time of surgery of NEC and the onset age were higher than that of Group 2 (onset age: G1 12.0[7.00;20.5], G2 9.00[4.00;13.0]; postnatal day at the time of surgery: G1 22.0[13.8;27.2], G2 13.0[8.00;21.0]) (P < 0.016). For comorbidity, the incidence of sepsis, coagulopathy, type of (congenital heart disease) CHD, and hypoproteinemia in Group 1 was higher than that in Group 2 (all P < 0.016), and the incidence of respiratory failure, hypoproteinemia in Group 1 was higher than that in Group 3 (all P < 0.016). For related treatment, the usage rate of vasoactive substances and mechanical ventilation in Group 1 was higher than that of Group 2 and Group 3 (all P < 0.016). By Lasso and Logistic regression analysis, we found that GA (OR: 0.274, 95%CI: 0.078-0.796), sepsis (OR: 7.955, 95%CI: 1.424-65.21), coagulopathy (OR: 19.51, 95%CI: 3.393-179.1), CHD (OR: 6.99, 95%CI: 1.418-54.83) and diseased bowel segment (OR: 2.804, 95%CI: 1.301-7.316) were the independent factors for poor prognosis (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The clinical features of NEC-IP patients differ based on GA, particularly in terms of CHD type, postnatal day at the time of surgery, utilization of vasoactive substances, and prognosis. Furthermore, GA, sepsis, coagulopathy, CHD, and diseased bowel segment are independent factors for poor prognosis of patients with NEC-IP.

胎龄对坏死性小肠结肠炎相关肠穿孔临床特征的影响。
目的:探讨不同胎龄新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎相关肠穿孔(NEC-IP)的临床特点。此外,我们还想确定这些患者预后不良的危险因素。方法:回顾性研究NEC-IP患者的基本资料、合并症、术中表现、相关治疗及预后。结果:113例患者中,1 ~ 3组分别为36例(31.9%)、44例(38.9%)、33例(29.2%);整体预后不良比例为19.4%(22/113)。基本资料方面,1组新生儿出生体重低于2、3组,手术时出生日数及起病年龄均高于2组(起病年龄:G1 12.0[7.00;20.5], G2 9.00[4.00;13.0];结论:不同GA的NEC-IP患者的临床特征存在差异,特别是在冠心病类型、手术时出生天数、血管活性物质的使用和预后等方面。此外,GA、败血症、凝血功能障碍、冠心病、病变肠段是NEC-IP患者预后不良的独立因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信