Computer-Assisted Classification of the Squamocolumnar Junction.

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hannah R Phillips, Jeffrey R Fetzer, Sanket Bhattarai, Sandra Algarin Perneth, D Chamil C Codipilly, Derek W Ebner, Adam C Bledsoe, Amrit Kamboj, Daniel A Schupack, Victor Chedid, Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu, Diana Snyder, Karthik Ravi, Kevin Buller, Cadman L Leggett
{"title":"Computer-Assisted Classification of the Squamocolumnar Junction.","authors":"Hannah R Phillips, Jeffrey R Fetzer, Sanket Bhattarai, Sandra Algarin Perneth, D Chamil C Codipilly, Derek W Ebner, Adam C Bledsoe, Amrit Kamboj, Daniel A Schupack, Victor Chedid, Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu, Diana Snyder, Karthik Ravi, Kevin Buller, Cadman L Leggett","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>An irregular z-line is characterized by a squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) that extends proximally above the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) by < 1 centimeter (cm), while Barrett's esophagus (BE) is defined as a columnar lined esophagus (CLE) that extends proximally by ≥1 cm with the presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia (IM) on biopsy. Measurement of CLE is most accurate for lengths ≥1 cm, and as such, guidelines do not recommend biopsy of an irregular z-line when seen on endoscopy. However, a CLE is often estimated by visual inspection rather than direct measurement, making this characterization imprecise. In this study, we present methodology to standardize the characterization of the SCJ, hypothesizing that the shape of the z-line can be used as a surrogate classifier. We present a computer-generated algorithm capable of automated segmentation and shape complexity quantification of the z-line.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>849 images of the z-line were selected and manually segmented. We used the nnUNet framework to train a model to segment the z-line. An additional dataset of 58 videos containing the z-line were obtained from the Mayo Clinic Endoscopy video library. A high-quality image containing the z-line was selected from each video. Ten gastroenterologists (5 esophageal experts) rated each of the 58 video/image pairs containing the z-line as \"regular\" or \"irregular,\" including their degree of confidence. Fleiss kappa statistics was used to determine interobserver variability. The \"ground truth\" classification was determined by the esophageal expert majority vote. A wavelet decomposition model was then used to determine the threshold of irregularity based on the ground truth. Heat maps were generated for each z-line to determine localized areas of complexity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fair agreement, with a Fleiss' kappa of 0.39, was observed between the 10 endoscopists when rating the z-line as \"regular\" vs \"irregular\" using this dataset. Moderate agreement was observed between the 5 esophageal experts with a Fleiss' kappa statistic of 0.42, and fair agreement was observed between the 5 non-esophageal experts with a Fleiss' kappa statistic of 0.31. The wavelet energy coefficient optimal threshold to classify an SCJ as irregular was determined to be 1.53×10ˆ7 with an accuracy of 78%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our computer-generated model was capable of auto-segmentation and classification of the z-line. We established a threshold of complexity using wavelet energy coefficient to standardize the classification of the SCJ.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: An irregular z-line is characterized by a squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) that extends proximally above the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) by < 1 centimeter (cm), while Barrett's esophagus (BE) is defined as a columnar lined esophagus (CLE) that extends proximally by ≥1 cm with the presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia (IM) on biopsy. Measurement of CLE is most accurate for lengths ≥1 cm, and as such, guidelines do not recommend biopsy of an irregular z-line when seen on endoscopy. However, a CLE is often estimated by visual inspection rather than direct measurement, making this characterization imprecise. In this study, we present methodology to standardize the characterization of the SCJ, hypothesizing that the shape of the z-line can be used as a surrogate classifier. We present a computer-generated algorithm capable of automated segmentation and shape complexity quantification of the z-line.

Methods: 849 images of the z-line were selected and manually segmented. We used the nnUNet framework to train a model to segment the z-line. An additional dataset of 58 videos containing the z-line were obtained from the Mayo Clinic Endoscopy video library. A high-quality image containing the z-line was selected from each video. Ten gastroenterologists (5 esophageal experts) rated each of the 58 video/image pairs containing the z-line as "regular" or "irregular," including their degree of confidence. Fleiss kappa statistics was used to determine interobserver variability. The "ground truth" classification was determined by the esophageal expert majority vote. A wavelet decomposition model was then used to determine the threshold of irregularity based on the ground truth. Heat maps were generated for each z-line to determine localized areas of complexity.

Results: Fair agreement, with a Fleiss' kappa of 0.39, was observed between the 10 endoscopists when rating the z-line as "regular" vs "irregular" using this dataset. Moderate agreement was observed between the 5 esophageal experts with a Fleiss' kappa statistic of 0.42, and fair agreement was observed between the 5 non-esophageal experts with a Fleiss' kappa statistic of 0.31. The wavelet energy coefficient optimal threshold to classify an SCJ as irregular was determined to be 1.53×10ˆ7 with an accuracy of 78%.

Conclusion: Our computer-generated model was capable of auto-segmentation and classification of the z-line. We established a threshold of complexity using wavelet energy coefficient to standardize the classification of the SCJ.

鳞状柱状结的计算机辅助分类。
背景和目的:不规则的z线以鳞状柱状连接(SCJ)为特征,其近端延伸至胃食管连接(GEJ)上方< 1厘米(cm),而Barrett食管(BE)被定义为柱状内衬食管(CLE),其近端延伸≥1厘米,活检显示存在特化肠化生(IM)。对于长度≥1cm的CLE测量最准确,因此,指南不建议在内窥镜检查中看到不规则的z线活检。然而,CLE通常是通过目视检查而不是直接测量来估计的,这使得这种表征不精确。在本研究中,我们提出了标准化SCJ特征的方法,假设z线的形状可以用作替代分类器。我们提出了一种计算机生成的算法,能够自动分割和形状复杂性量化的z线。方法:选取849张z线图像进行人工分割。我们使用nnUNet框架来训练模型来分割z线。从梅奥诊所内窥镜视频库获得了包含z线的58个视频的附加数据集。从每个视频中选择包含z线的高质量图像。10位胃肠病学家(5位食道专家)将58对包含z线的视频/图像分别评为“规则”或“不规则”,包括他们的自信程度。采用Fleiss kappa统计来确定观察者间的可变性。“基础真相”分类由食道专家多数票决定。然后采用小波分解模型,根据地面真值确定不规则阈值。为每条z线生成热图,以确定局部复杂区域。结果:在使用该数据集将z线评定为“规则”与“不规则”时,在10名内窥镜医师之间观察到公平的一致性,Fleiss kappa为0.39。5名食道专家的Fleiss kappa统计值为0.42,符合程度中等;5名非食道专家的Fleiss kappa统计值为0.31,符合程度一般。确定小波能量系数对不规则SCJ分类的最佳阈值为1.53×10 ^ 7,准确率为78%。结论:计算机生成的模型能够对z线进行自动分割和分类。利用小波能量系数建立了复杂度阈值,对SCJ进行了标准化分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信