Effect of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation on depressive and anxiety symptoms: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Anna Rihs , Anna Schoeni , Tamara Scharf , Julian Jakob , Kali Tal , Isabelle Jacot-Sadowski , Jean-Paul Humair , Anja Frei , Martin Brutsche , Nicolas Rodondi , Reto Auer , Stéphanie Baggio
{"title":"Effect of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation on depressive and anxiety symptoms: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Anna Rihs ,&nbsp;Anna Schoeni ,&nbsp;Tamara Scharf ,&nbsp;Julian Jakob ,&nbsp;Kali Tal ,&nbsp;Isabelle Jacot-Sadowski ,&nbsp;Jean-Paul Humair ,&nbsp;Anja Frei ,&nbsp;Martin Brutsche ,&nbsp;Nicolas Rodondi ,&nbsp;Reto Auer ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Baggio","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to assess differences in depressive and anxiety symptoms at 6-month follow-up in a smoking cessation trial using e-cigarettes as quitting aids.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a secondary analysis of the Swiss multicentre ESTxENDS smoking cessation randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing differences in depressive (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9, range: 0–27) and anxiety symptoms (General Anxiety Disorder-7, GAD-7, range: 0–21) at 6-month follow-up comparing participants who received e-cigarettes to those who received smoking cessation counseling alone.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1244 participants 913 completed the PHQ-9 and 884 the GAD-7 at 6-month follow-up. Mean PHQ-9 scores (SD) at 6 months for the intervention group were 3.7 (3.9), control group: 4.0 (4.2); mean GAD-7 scores (SD) at 6 months for the intervention group were 4.6 (4.3), control group: 4.6 (4.4). Multivariable analyses showed no evidence of a clinically relevant intervention effect on the PHQ-9 [coefficient − 0.101, 95 % CI -0.182 to −0.019, <em>p</em> = .016, corresponding to a 0.9 decrease of the original PHQ-9 score] and the GAD-7 scores [coefficient − 0.056, 95 % CI -0.135 to 0.022, <em>p</em> = .160] in the main adjusted models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among smokers who participated in the ESTxENDS smoking cessation trial, we found distribution of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in addition to standard counseling compared to counseling alone had no clinically relevant effect on depressive or anxiety symptoms at 6-month follow-up.</div><div>Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials <span><span>NCT03603340</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325000118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to assess differences in depressive and anxiety symptoms at 6-month follow-up in a smoking cessation trial using e-cigarettes as quitting aids.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of the Swiss multicentre ESTxENDS smoking cessation randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing differences in depressive (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9, range: 0–27) and anxiety symptoms (General Anxiety Disorder-7, GAD-7, range: 0–21) at 6-month follow-up comparing participants who received e-cigarettes to those who received smoking cessation counseling alone.

Results

Of 1244 participants 913 completed the PHQ-9 and 884 the GAD-7 at 6-month follow-up. Mean PHQ-9 scores (SD) at 6 months for the intervention group were 3.7 (3.9), control group: 4.0 (4.2); mean GAD-7 scores (SD) at 6 months for the intervention group were 4.6 (4.3), control group: 4.6 (4.4). Multivariable analyses showed no evidence of a clinically relevant intervention effect on the PHQ-9 [coefficient − 0.101, 95 % CI -0.182 to −0.019, p = .016, corresponding to a 0.9 decrease of the original PHQ-9 score] and the GAD-7 scores [coefficient − 0.056, 95 % CI -0.135 to 0.022, p = .160] in the main adjusted models.

Conclusions

Among smokers who participated in the ESTxENDS smoking cessation trial, we found distribution of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in addition to standard counseling compared to counseling alone had no clinically relevant effect on depressive or anxiety symptoms at 6-month follow-up.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials NCT03603340
电子烟戒烟对抑郁和焦虑症状的影响:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
目的:本研究旨在评估使用电子烟作为戒烟辅助的戒烟试验中6个月随访期间抑郁和焦虑症状的差异。方法:我们对瑞士多中心ESTxENDS戒烟随机对照试验(RCT)进行了二次分析,评估在6个月的随访中,接受电子烟治疗的参与者与单独接受戒烟咨询的参与者在抑郁(患者健康问卷-9,PHQ-9,范围:0-27)和焦虑症状(一般焦虑障碍-7,GAD-7,范围:0-21)方面的差异。结果:在6个月的随访中,1244名参与者中913名完成了PHQ-9, 884名完成了GAD-7。干预组6个月平均PHQ-9评分(SD) 3.7分(3.9分),对照组4.0分(4.2分);干预组6个月时GAD-7平均评分(SD) 4.6分(4.3分),对照组4.6分(4.4分)。多变量分析显示,在主要调整模型中,没有证据表明临床相关干预对PHQ-9[系数- 0.101,95% CI -0.182至-0.019,p = 0.016,对应于原始PHQ-9评分降低0.9]和GAD-7评分[系数- 0.056,95% CI -0.135至0.022,p = 0.160]有影响。结论:在参加ESTxENDS戒烟试验的吸烟者中,我们发现在6个月的随访中,在标准咨询的基础上分发戒烟电子烟与单独咨询相比,对抑郁或焦虑症状没有临床相关的影响。试验注册:ClinicalTrials NCT03603340。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信