Muscle power is associated with higher levels of walking capacity and self-reported gait performance and physical activity in individuals with cerebral palsy.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1488905
Mattie E Pontiff, Abhinandan Batra, Li Li, Noelle G Moreau
{"title":"Muscle power is associated with higher levels of walking capacity and self-reported gait performance and physical activity in individuals with cerebral palsy.","authors":"Mattie E Pontiff, Abhinandan Batra, Li Li, Noelle G Moreau","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1488905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between a Power Leg Press test (PLP) with walking capacity and self-reported performance and participation in individuals with Cerebral Palsy (CP), and to compare the strength of the associations between two power tests (PLP and isokinetic (IsoK)) with walking capacity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ambulatory individuals with CP (n = 33; age 17.89 ± 7.52 years) performed five inclined power leg presses at 40%-50% of their 1-repetition maximum \"as fast as possible\". A linear position transducer was attached to the weight bar, and the displacement, total load, and angle of the sled were used to calculate peak power for each trial. Isokinetic knee extensor power was measured at 60 deg/sec. Walking capacity was measured using the 10-m walk test fast (FS) and self-selected (SS) speeds and the 1-min walk test (1MWT). Self-reported performance and participation measures were the Activities Scale for Kids-performance (ASKp), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS<sup>®</sup>), and the Gait Outcomes Assessment List (GOAL). Pearson's correlation coefficients determined relationships between power measures with walking capacity and self-report measures (α < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PLP and IsoK power were significantly correlated to SS (r = 0.361, r = 0.376), FS (r = 0.511, r = 0.485), and 1MWT (r = 0.583. r = 0.443), respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the strength of the associations between walking capacity and each test of power (PLP and Isok) (<i>p</i> > 0.05). PLP power was significantly correlated to composite scores on the ASKp (r = 0.690) and GOAL (r = 0.577) and to four components of the PROMIS, including physical function (r = 0.588) (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The Gait and Mobility subscale of the GOAL (r = 0.705) and the Locomotion (r = 0.636), Transfers (r = 0.547), and Standing (r = 0.521) subscales of the ASKp had strong relationships to peak power produced during the PLP test (<i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PLP power was significantly correlated with walking capacity and self-reported walking performance and mobility-based participation in ambulatory individuals with CP. Higher movement velocities associated with the PLP test may explain the significant associations of power with faster gait speeds. Self-reported mobility performance and physical activity also showed moderate to strong relationships with lower extremity power. Overall, these results suggest a strong link between decreased muscle power generation and walking limitations in individuals with CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1488905"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1488905","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between a Power Leg Press test (PLP) with walking capacity and self-reported performance and participation in individuals with Cerebral Palsy (CP), and to compare the strength of the associations between two power tests (PLP and isokinetic (IsoK)) with walking capacity.

Methods: Ambulatory individuals with CP (n = 33; age 17.89 ± 7.52 years) performed five inclined power leg presses at 40%-50% of their 1-repetition maximum "as fast as possible". A linear position transducer was attached to the weight bar, and the displacement, total load, and angle of the sled were used to calculate peak power for each trial. Isokinetic knee extensor power was measured at 60 deg/sec. Walking capacity was measured using the 10-m walk test fast (FS) and self-selected (SS) speeds and the 1-min walk test (1MWT). Self-reported performance and participation measures were the Activities Scale for Kids-performance (ASKp), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®), and the Gait Outcomes Assessment List (GOAL). Pearson's correlation coefficients determined relationships between power measures with walking capacity and self-report measures (α < 0.05).

Results: PLP and IsoK power were significantly correlated to SS (r = 0.361, r = 0.376), FS (r = 0.511, r = 0.485), and 1MWT (r = 0.583. r = 0.443), respectively (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the strength of the associations between walking capacity and each test of power (PLP and Isok) (p > 0.05). PLP power was significantly correlated to composite scores on the ASKp (r = 0.690) and GOAL (r = 0.577) and to four components of the PROMIS, including physical function (r = 0.588) (p < 0.01). The Gait and Mobility subscale of the GOAL (r = 0.705) and the Locomotion (r = 0.636), Transfers (r = 0.547), and Standing (r = 0.521) subscales of the ASKp had strong relationships to peak power produced during the PLP test (p < 0.01).

Discussion: PLP power was significantly correlated with walking capacity and self-reported walking performance and mobility-based participation in ambulatory individuals with CP. Higher movement velocities associated with the PLP test may explain the significant associations of power with faster gait speeds. Self-reported mobility performance and physical activity also showed moderate to strong relationships with lower extremity power. Overall, these results suggest a strong link between decreased muscle power generation and walking limitations in individuals with CP.

在脑瘫患者中,肌肉力量与更高水平的行走能力、自我报告的步态表现和身体活动有关。
摘要:本研究旨在探讨脑性瘫痪(CP)患者行走能力的力量腿按压测试(PLP)与自我报告的表现和参与之间的关系,并比较两种力量测试(PLP和等速运动测试(IsoK))与行走能力之间的关联强度。方法:门诊CP患者(n = 33;年龄(17.89±7.52岁)以最大重复次数的40% ~ 50%“尽可能快”进行5次倾斜力量腿按压。在称重杆上安装了一个线性位置传感器,利用滑橇的位移、总载荷和角度计算每次试验的峰值功率。等速膝关节伸肌功率以60度/秒测量。采用10米步行测试快速(FS)和自选(SS)速度以及1分钟步行测试(1MWT)来测量步行能力。自我报告的表现和参与措施是儿童活动量表(ASKp)、患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS®)和步态结果评估表(GOAL)。Pearson相关系数决定了步行能力的动力测量与自述测量之间的关系(α < 0.05)。结果:PLP、IsoK功率与SS (r = 0.361, r = 0.376)、FS (r = 0.511, r = 0.485)、1MWT (r = 0.583)显著相关。R = 0.443),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。行走能力与各项功率测试之间的关联强度(PLP和Isok)无显著差异(p < 0.05)。PLP效能与ASKp (r = 0.690)和GOAL (r = 0.577)的综合得分以及PROMIS (r = 0.588)等四个组成部分的综合得分显著相关(p < 0.01)。目标的步态和移动分量表(r = 0.705)以及ASKp的运动分量表(r = 0.636)、转移分量表(r = 0.547)和站立分量表(r = 0.521)与PLP测试期间产生的峰值功率有很强的关系(p < 0.01)。讨论:PLP功率与行走能力、自我报告的行走表现和活动参与显著相关。与PLP测试相关的更高的运动速度可能解释了功率与更快的步态速度的显著关联。自我报告的活动能力表现和身体活动也显示出与下肢力量的中度到强烈的关系。总的来说,这些结果表明,CP患者肌肉发电量下降与行走受限之间存在密切联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信