mHealth-based exercise vs. traditional exercise on pain, functional disability, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-01-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1511199
Liang Tang, Meng-Ming Wang, He-Xia Wang, Xiao-Ya He, Yue-Shuai Jiang
{"title":"mHealth-based exercise vs. traditional exercise on pain, functional disability, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Liang Tang, Meng-Ming Wang, He-Xia Wang, Xiao-Ya He, Yue-Shuai Jiang","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1511199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the efficacy of mHealth-based exercise interventions with traditional exercise in improving pain intensity, functional disability, and quality of life in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from their inception to 23 August 2024 were searched in Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Web of Science. Reviewer pairs independently extracted data and evaluated bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies, with a total of 800 participants with a mean age of 55.51 ± 6.88 years, were identified. All RCTs were performed from 2013 to 2024. There was no statistically significant difference between mHealth-supported exercise compared with the traditional exercise without mHealth in terms of pain reduction (standard mean differences [SMD] = -0.35; 95%CI: -0.74 to 0.04, P = 0.08), functional disability (SMD = -0.5; 95%CI: -0.1 to 0.01; P = 0.05), and quality of life (SMD = 0.11; 95%CI: -0.26 to 0.48; P = 0.56). However, a statistically significant difference was found between mHealth-supported exercise compared with unsupervised traditional exercise in terms of pain (SMD = -1.03; 95%CI: -1.49 to -0.57; P < 0.001) and functional disability (SMD = -0.89; 95%CI: -1.71 to -0.06; P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>mHealth-based exercise was found to be more effective than unsupervised conventional exercise in promoting pain relief and enhancing functional disability in patients with OA. When face-to-face exercise intervention is not feasible, mHealth-based exercise should be considered a viable option in the recovery process for knee OA. Given the significant heterogeneity observed in this study, it is important to exercise caution when extrapolating the results.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42024610393.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1511199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1511199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the efficacy of mHealth-based exercise interventions with traditional exercise in improving pain intensity, functional disability, and quality of life in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Method: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from their inception to 23 August 2024 were searched in Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Web of Science. Reviewer pairs independently extracted data and evaluated bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

Results: Eleven studies, with a total of 800 participants with a mean age of 55.51 ± 6.88 years, were identified. All RCTs were performed from 2013 to 2024. There was no statistically significant difference between mHealth-supported exercise compared with the traditional exercise without mHealth in terms of pain reduction (standard mean differences [SMD] = -0.35; 95%CI: -0.74 to 0.04, P = 0.08), functional disability (SMD = -0.5; 95%CI: -0.1 to 0.01; P = 0.05), and quality of life (SMD = 0.11; 95%CI: -0.26 to 0.48; P = 0.56). However, a statistically significant difference was found between mHealth-supported exercise compared with unsupervised traditional exercise in terms of pain (SMD = -1.03; 95%CI: -1.49 to -0.57; P < 0.001) and functional disability (SMD = -0.89; 95%CI: -1.71 to -0.06; P = 0.04).

Conclusion: mHealth-based exercise was found to be more effective than unsupervised conventional exercise in promoting pain relief and enhancing functional disability in patients with OA. When face-to-face exercise intervention is not feasible, mHealth-based exercise should be considered a viable option in the recovery process for knee OA. Given the significant heterogeneity observed in this study, it is important to exercise caution when extrapolating the results.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42024610393.

基于移动健康的运动与传统运动对膝关节骨关节炎患者疼痛、功能残疾和生活质量的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:本研究旨在比较基于移动健康的运动干预与传统运动在改善膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者疼痛强度、功能残疾和生活质量方面的效果。方法:检索Cochrane、Embase、Medline、Web of Science中从开始到2024年8月23日发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)。审稿人对独立提取数据并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚。结果:纳入11项研究,共纳入受试者800人,平均年龄55.51±6.88岁。所有随机对照试验于2013年至2024年进行。在疼痛减轻方面,移动健康支持的运动与没有移动健康的传统运动之间没有统计学上的显著差异(标准平均差异[SMD] = -0.35;95%CI: -0.74 ~ 0.04, P = 0.08),功能性残疾(SMD = -0.5;95%CI: -0.1 ~ 0.01;P = 0.05)、生活质量(SMD = 0.11;95%CI: -0.26 ~ 0.48;P = 0.56)。然而,与无监督的传统运动相比,移动健康支持的运动在疼痛方面存在统计学显著差异(SMD = -1.03;95%CI: -1.49 ~ -0.57;P < 0.001)和功能障碍(SMD = -0.89;95%CI: -1.71 ~ -0.06;P = 0.04)。结论:与无监督的常规运动相比,基于移动健康的运动在促进OA患者疼痛缓解和增强功能障碍方面更有效。当面对面的运动干预不可行时,基于移动健康的运动应该被认为是膝关节OA恢复过程中一个可行的选择。考虑到本研究中观察到的显著异质性,在推断结果时要谨慎行事。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails,标识符CRD42024610393。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信