{"title":"Applications of MR Finger printing derived T1 and T2 values in Adult brain: A Systematic review.","authors":"Riyan Mohamed Sajer, Saikiran Pendem, Rajagopal Kadavigere, Priyanka -, Shailesh Nayak S, Kaushik Nayak, Tancia Pires, Obhuli Chandran M, Abhijith S, Varsha Raghu","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.160088.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for brain imaging, but conventional methods rely on qualitative contrast, are time-intensive, and prone to variability. Magnetic resonance finger printing (MRF) addresses these limitations by enabling fast, simultaneous mapping of multiple tissue properties like T1, T2. Using dynamic acquisition parameters and a precomputed signal dictionary, MRF provides robust, qualitative maps, improving diagnostic precision and expanding clinical and research applications in brain imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Database searches were performed through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of science to identify relevant articles focusing on the application of MR finger printing in the adult brain. We utilized the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines to extract data from the selected studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine articles were included in the final review, with a total sample size of 332 participants. In healthy brains, notable regional, sex, age, and hemispheric variations were identified, particularly in the corpus callosum and thalamus. MRF effectively differentiated meningioma subtypes, glioma grades, and IDH mutation status, with T2 values providing particularly predictive for glioma classification. In brain metastases, significant relaxometry differences were noted between normal and lesional tissues. For multiple sclerosis, MRF values correlated with clinical and disability measures, distinguishing relapsing-remitting secondary progressive forms. In traumatic brain injury, longitudinal T1 changes strongly correlated with clinical recovery, surpassing T2 values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The systematic review highlighted MRD as a groundbreaking technique that enhances neurological diagnosis by simultaneously quantifying T1 and T2 relaxation times. With reduced acquisition times, MRF outperforms conventional MRI in detecting subtle pathologies, distinguishing properties, and providing reliable biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.160088.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for brain imaging, but conventional methods rely on qualitative contrast, are time-intensive, and prone to variability. Magnetic resonance finger printing (MRF) addresses these limitations by enabling fast, simultaneous mapping of multiple tissue properties like T1, T2. Using dynamic acquisition parameters and a precomputed signal dictionary, MRF provides robust, qualitative maps, improving diagnostic precision and expanding clinical and research applications in brain imaging.
Methods: Database searches were performed through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of science to identify relevant articles focusing on the application of MR finger printing in the adult brain. We utilized the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines to extract data from the selected studies.
Results: Nine articles were included in the final review, with a total sample size of 332 participants. In healthy brains, notable regional, sex, age, and hemispheric variations were identified, particularly in the corpus callosum and thalamus. MRF effectively differentiated meningioma subtypes, glioma grades, and IDH mutation status, with T2 values providing particularly predictive for glioma classification. In brain metastases, significant relaxometry differences were noted between normal and lesional tissues. For multiple sclerosis, MRF values correlated with clinical and disability measures, distinguishing relapsing-remitting secondary progressive forms. In traumatic brain injury, longitudinal T1 changes strongly correlated with clinical recovery, surpassing T2 values.
Conclusions: The systematic review highlighted MRD as a groundbreaking technique that enhances neurological diagnosis by simultaneously quantifying T1 and T2 relaxation times. With reduced acquisition times, MRF outperforms conventional MRI in detecting subtle pathologies, distinguishing properties, and providing reliable biomarkers.
简介:磁共振成像(MRI)对脑成像至关重要,但传统的方法依赖于定性对比,耗时长,而且容易发生变化。磁共振指纹(MRF)通过实现快速,同时映射多个组织属性(如T1, T2)来解决这些限制。利用动态采集参数和预先计算的信号字典,磁共振成像提供了强大的定性图,提高了诊断精度,扩大了脑成像的临床和研究应用。方法:通过PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of science等数据库进行检索,找出MR指纹识别在成人脑部应用的相关文章。我们利用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目从选定的研究中提取数据。结果:最终纳入9篇文献,总样本量为332人。在健康的大脑中,发现了显著的区域、性别、年龄和半球差异,特别是在胼胝体和丘脑中。MRF可有效区分脑膜瘤亚型、胶质瘤分级和IDH突变状态,T2值可特别预测胶质瘤的分类。在脑转移瘤中,正常组织和病变组织之间存在明显的松弛测量差异。对于多发性硬化症,MRF值与临床和残疾指标相关,可区分复发缓解型继发性进展形式。在外伤性脑损伤中,纵向T1变化与临床恢复密切相关,超过T2值。结论:该系统综述强调MRD是一项突破性技术,通过同时量化T1和T2松弛时间来增强神经学诊断。随着采集时间的缩短,MRF在检测细微病变、区分特性和提供可靠的生物标志物方面优于传统MRI。
F1000ResearchPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍:
F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.