Open lower limb fracture reconstruction in the elderly population: the experience of a major trauma centre.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Manuela Roman, Metin Ali Nizamoglu, Garance Biosse-Duplan, Dan Gearon, Ahid Abood, Keith Anderson
{"title":"Open lower limb fracture reconstruction in the elderly population: the experience of a major trauma centre.","authors":"Manuela Roman, Metin Ali Nizamoglu, Garance Biosse-Duplan, Dan Gearon, Ahid Abood, Keith Anderson","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02688-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Management of the elderly patients presenting with open lower limb fractures is challenging due to physiological changes and pre-existing co-morbidities. The aim of this study was to assess the compliance with the British Orthopaedic Association's Standards for Trauma Number 4 (BOAST 4) guidelines in this patient group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included a retrospective analysis of all the patients aged > 65 years old admitted with open lower limb fracture between 2017 and 2019 to a major trauma centre (MTC) in East of England.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 91 patients presenting with lower limb trauma. The most common injury was a Gustilo and Anderson grade IIIB (39.6%). 30.8% of the study population received antibiotics within 1 h, 89% had debridement and bone stabilization within 24 h. Mean time to definitive soft tissue coverage was 3 days, with 66% of the study group having their fracture fixed and soft tissue coverage within 72 h. 52% had direct wound closure, with 9% having an incisional topical negative pressure wound therapy, 17% had a local flap and 5% patients had a free flap. The most common complication was wound dehiscence. The wounds closed without an incisional topical negative pressure wound therapy have shown a dehiscence rate of 15.4%, compared to 0% in the patients who had one.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that BOAST 4 compliance in the population > 65 years is comparable to the younger population. It is likely that the lower energy injury profile enables early definitive management even in the presence of age related co-morbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02688-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Management of the elderly patients presenting with open lower limb fractures is challenging due to physiological changes and pre-existing co-morbidities. The aim of this study was to assess the compliance with the British Orthopaedic Association's Standards for Trauma Number 4 (BOAST 4) guidelines in this patient group.

Methods: The study included a retrospective analysis of all the patients aged > 65 years old admitted with open lower limb fracture between 2017 and 2019 to a major trauma centre (MTC) in East of England.

Results: Our study included 91 patients presenting with lower limb trauma. The most common injury was a Gustilo and Anderson grade IIIB (39.6%). 30.8% of the study population received antibiotics within 1 h, 89% had debridement and bone stabilization within 24 h. Mean time to definitive soft tissue coverage was 3 days, with 66% of the study group having their fracture fixed and soft tissue coverage within 72 h. 52% had direct wound closure, with 9% having an incisional topical negative pressure wound therapy, 17% had a local flap and 5% patients had a free flap. The most common complication was wound dehiscence. The wounds closed without an incisional topical negative pressure wound therapy have shown a dehiscence rate of 15.4%, compared to 0% in the patients who had one.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that BOAST 4 compliance in the population > 65 years is comparable to the younger population. It is likely that the lower energy injury profile enables early definitive management even in the presence of age related co-morbidities.

老年人开放下肢骨折重建:一个主要创伤中心的经验。
目的:老年开放性下肢骨折患者由于生理变化和既往合并症的存在,其治疗具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估该患者组对英国骨科协会创伤标准第4号(夸4)指南的依从性。方法:该研究包括对2017年至2019年在英格兰东部一家主要创伤中心(MTC)收治的所有年龄在bb0 ~ 65岁之间的开放性下肢骨折患者进行回顾性分析。结果:我们的研究纳入了91例下肢外伤患者。最常见的损伤是Gustilo和Andersonⅲib级(39.6%)。30.8%的研究人群在1小时内使用抗生素,89%在24小时内进行清创和骨稳定。软组织覆盖的平均时间为3天,66%的研究组在72小时内完成骨折固定和软组织覆盖。52%的患者直接缝合伤口,9%的患者采用切口局部负压伤口治疗,17%的患者采用局部皮瓣,5%的患者采用游离皮瓣。最常见的并发症是伤口裂开。无切口局部负压伤口治疗的伤口裂开率为15.4%,而有切口负压伤口治疗的伤口裂开率为0%。结论:我们的研究表明,65岁以下人群的bobo4依从性与年轻人群相当。即使存在与年龄相关的合并症,较低的能量损伤特征也可能使早期明确的管理成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信