Effects of upper extremity blood flow restriction training on muscle strength and hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1488305
Jiapeng Jing, Qinzhi Zheng, Hongfei Dong, Yan Wang, Peiji Wang, Di Fan, Zhuo Xu
{"title":"Effects of upper extremity blood flow restriction training on muscle strength and hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jiapeng Jing, Qinzhi Zheng, Hongfei Dong, Yan Wang, Peiji Wang, Di Fan, Zhuo Xu","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1488305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low load resistance training with blood flow restriction (LL-BFRT) has been shown to improve muscle strength and hypertrophic function. The effect of LL-BFRT on lower extremity muscle improvement has been widely discussed. However, no studies have discussed the effect of this training method on the upper extremity muscles until now. This systematic review and meta-analysis focused on the use of LL-BFRT in the upper extremity muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The relevant literature was searched in four major databases including Pubmed, Web of science, the Cochrane Library and Embase from 10 June 2024. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool and GRADE methodology were used to assess the risk of bias and quality in included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included a total of 11 articles with 220 participants. LL-BFRT and high load resistance training (HLRT) produced similar effects in improving upper extremity muscle strength (low certainty evidence, SMD: -0.35; 95%CI: -0.73 to 0.03; <i>p</i>: 0.07; I<sup>2</sup>: 2%) and hypertrophy (moderate certainty evidence, SMD: -0.36; 95%CI: -0.73 to 0.01; <i>p</i>: 0.05; I<sup>2</sup>: 0%). Compared with low load resistance training (LLRT), LL-BFRT showed greater advantages in improving upper extremity muscle strength (low certainty evidence, SMD: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.33 to 1.01; <i>p</i>: 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup>: 0%) and hypertrophy (low certainty evidence, SMD: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.06 to 0.67; <i>p</i>: 0.02; I<sup>2</sup>: 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In general, LL-BFRT can be used as an alternative training method for HLRT to improve upper extremity muscle strength and hypertrophy. Our study shows that the effect of LL-BFRT on upper extremity muscle is limited by age and region. It is necessary to formulate reasonable exercise programs according to the characteristics of different demographic groups.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024555514.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1488305"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1488305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low load resistance training with blood flow restriction (LL-BFRT) has been shown to improve muscle strength and hypertrophic function. The effect of LL-BFRT on lower extremity muscle improvement has been widely discussed. However, no studies have discussed the effect of this training method on the upper extremity muscles until now. This systematic review and meta-analysis focused on the use of LL-BFRT in the upper extremity muscles.

Methods: The relevant literature was searched in four major databases including Pubmed, Web of science, the Cochrane Library and Embase from 10 June 2024. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool and GRADE methodology were used to assess the risk of bias and quality in included studies.

Results: The meta-analysis included a total of 11 articles with 220 participants. LL-BFRT and high load resistance training (HLRT) produced similar effects in improving upper extremity muscle strength (low certainty evidence, SMD: -0.35; 95%CI: -0.73 to 0.03; p: 0.07; I2: 2%) and hypertrophy (moderate certainty evidence, SMD: -0.36; 95%CI: -0.73 to 0.01; p: 0.05; I2: 0%). Compared with low load resistance training (LLRT), LL-BFRT showed greater advantages in improving upper extremity muscle strength (low certainty evidence, SMD: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.33 to 1.01; p: 0.0001; I2: 0%) and hypertrophy (low certainty evidence, SMD: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.06 to 0.67; p: 0.02; I2: 0%).

Conclusion: In general, LL-BFRT can be used as an alternative training method for HLRT to improve upper extremity muscle strength and hypertrophy. Our study shows that the effect of LL-BFRT on upper extremity muscle is limited by age and region. It is necessary to formulate reasonable exercise programs according to the characteristics of different demographic groups.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024555514.

上肢血流限制训练对肌肉力量和肥厚的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:低负荷阻力训练与血流量限制(LL-BFRT)已被证明可以改善肌肉力量和肥厚功能。l - bfrt对下肢肌肉改善的作用已被广泛讨论。然而,目前还没有研究讨论这种训练方法对上肢肌肉的影响。本系统综述和荟萃分析的重点是LL-BFRT在上肢肌肉中的应用。方法:从2024年6月10日起在Pubmed、Web of science、Cochrane Library和Embase四大数据库中检索相关文献。采用Cochrane协作的工具和GRADE方法评估纳入研究的偏倚风险和质量。结果:meta分析共纳入11篇文章,220名受试者。LL-BFRT和高负荷阻力训练(HLRT)在改善上肢肌肉力量方面产生相似的效果(低确定性证据,SMD: -0.35;95%CI: -0.73 ~ 0.03;p: 0.07;I2: 2%)和肥厚(中等确定性证据,SMD: -0.36;95%CI: -0.73 ~ 0.01;p: 0.05;I2: 0%)。与低负荷阻力训练(LLRT)相比,LL-BFRT在提高上肢肌力方面表现出更大的优势(低确定性证据,SMD: 0.67;95%CI: 0.33 ~ 1.01;p: 0.0001;I2: 0%)和肥厚(低确定性证据,SMD: 0.37;95%CI: 0.06 ~ 0.67;p: 0.02;I2: 0%)。结论:总的来说,LL-BFRT可以作为HLRT的替代训练方法,改善上肢肌力和肥厚。我们的研究表明,LL-BFRT对上肢肌肉的影响受年龄和地区的限制。有必要根据不同人口群体的特点制定合理的锻炼计划。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42024555514。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信