The Importance of Olfaction for Mixed Paternity in Birds

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Charlotta Kvarnemo, Alice Anderstedt, Maria Strandh, Donald Blomqvist
{"title":"The Importance of Olfaction for Mixed Paternity in Birds","authors":"Charlotta Kvarnemo,&nbsp;Alice Anderstedt,&nbsp;Maria Strandh,&nbsp;Donald Blomqvist","doi":"10.1002/ece3.70863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Olfaction can aid individuals in finding genetically compatible mates in many animals, while high levels of mixed paternity may result from a limited ability to evaluate their mate's genetic profile against their own before mating. To test this suggestion and explore if olfaction may indeed influence mating patterns in birds, we combined published measures of olfactory ability with data on genetic mating pattern in the same species, across a phylogenetically broad range of species. We used three measures of olfaction: (1) olfactory bulb diameter, (2) olfactory bulb volume and (3) number of olfactory receptor genes (148, 134 and 48 species, respectively). These measures were then matched to species-specific estimates of mating pattern, measured as percentage of broods with mixed paternity (&gt; 1 male siring offspring in the same brood). Limited overlaps between the datasets resulted in 30 matched species for olfactory bulb diameter, 31 for olfactory bulb volume and 15 for olfactory receptor genes. Controlling for brain size (telencephalon), we then correlated olfaction to mating pattern, and found that the bigger the relative olfactory bulb diameter, the lower the proportion of mixed paternity. In contrast, there was no significant correlation between olfactory bulb volume or number of receptor genes and paternity. This study thus indicates that mating patterns in birds may be influenced by olfactory ability, measured as olfactory bulb diameter. Next, we suggest expanding the datasets by collecting olfactory-focused measures, targeting species for which paternity measures already exist, to allow a full phylogenetic analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70863","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Olfaction can aid individuals in finding genetically compatible mates in many animals, while high levels of mixed paternity may result from a limited ability to evaluate their mate's genetic profile against their own before mating. To test this suggestion and explore if olfaction may indeed influence mating patterns in birds, we combined published measures of olfactory ability with data on genetic mating pattern in the same species, across a phylogenetically broad range of species. We used three measures of olfaction: (1) olfactory bulb diameter, (2) olfactory bulb volume and (3) number of olfactory receptor genes (148, 134 and 48 species, respectively). These measures were then matched to species-specific estimates of mating pattern, measured as percentage of broods with mixed paternity (> 1 male siring offspring in the same brood). Limited overlaps between the datasets resulted in 30 matched species for olfactory bulb diameter, 31 for olfactory bulb volume and 15 for olfactory receptor genes. Controlling for brain size (telencephalon), we then correlated olfaction to mating pattern, and found that the bigger the relative olfactory bulb diameter, the lower the proportion of mixed paternity. In contrast, there was no significant correlation between olfactory bulb volume or number of receptor genes and paternity. This study thus indicates that mating patterns in birds may be influenced by olfactory ability, measured as olfactory bulb diameter. Next, we suggest expanding the datasets by collecting olfactory-focused measures, targeting species for which paternity measures already exist, to allow a full phylogenetic analysis.

嗅觉在鸟类混合父权中的重要性。
在许多动物中,嗅觉可以帮助个体找到基因相容的配偶,而高水平的混合父权可能是由于在交配前对配偶的基因特征进行评估的能力有限。为了验证这一观点,并探索嗅觉是否真的会影响鸟类的交配模式,我们将已发表的嗅觉能力测量数据与同一物种的遗传交配模式数据结合起来,在系统发育上广泛的物种范围内。我们采用了三种嗅觉测量方法:(1)嗅球直径,(2)嗅球体积和(3)嗅受体基因数量(分别为148、134和48种)。然后将这些测量结果与物种特定的交配模式估计相匹配,以混合父权的育雏百分比来衡量(同一育雏中有100个雄性繁殖后代)。数据集之间有限的重叠导致嗅球直径有30个匹配物种,嗅球体积有31个匹配物种,嗅受体基因有15个匹配物种。在控制脑大小(端脑)的情况下,我们将嗅觉与交配模式联系起来,发现相对嗅球直径越大,混合父系的比例越低。相比之下,嗅球体积或受体基因数量与父系关系无显著相关性。因此,这项研究表明,鸟类的交配模式可能受到嗅觉能力(以嗅球直径衡量)的影响。接下来,我们建议通过收集以嗅觉为重点的测量来扩展数据集,针对已经存在父权测量的物种,以允许进行完整的系统发育分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信