{"title":"Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Changes in Epicardial Adipose Tissue: A Systematic Literature Review And Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Panagiotis Theofilis, Evangelos Oikonomou, Panayotis K Vlachakis, Paschalis Karakasis, Kyriakos Dimitriadis, Marios Sagris, Konstantinos Pamporis, Maria Drakopoulou, Gerasimos Siasos, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Dimitris Tousoulis","doi":"10.2174/0115701611330060241204062248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have emerged as a groundbreaking class of antidiabetic medications renowned for their glucose-lowering effects and cardiovascular benefits. Recent studies have suggested that SGLT2 inhibitors may extend their influence beyond glycemic control to impact adipose tissue physiology, particularly within the epicardial adipose depot. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), an actively secretory organ surrounding the heart, has been implicated in the modulation of cardiovascular risk.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to systematically review and synthesize existing literature on the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on EAT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a literature search for studies assessing the changes in epicardial adipose tissue volume/thickness before and after treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor. We excluded reviews, editorials, case reports/case series, experimental studies, and studies that did not use SGLT2 inhibitors as the intervention. The main outcome of interest was the change in EAT volume/thickness at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search yielded 72 results. After the application of the exclusion criteria, a total of 11 studies were selected for data extraction and inclusion in the meta-analysis. A mean of 6.57ml decreased EAT volume, and EAT thickness was reduced by a mean of 1.55mm. We detected that treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor was associated with decreased EAT volume/thickness compared to the control group (SMD -1.79, 95% CI -2.91 to -0.66, p<0.01). There was substantial betweenstudy heterogeneity (I2: 94%, p<0.001). Results remained robust even after the exclusion of any single study. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly greater effect size in randomized studies. Funnel plot inspection and Egger's regression test did not indicate the presence of publication bias Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors use is associated with a reduction in EAT volume/thickness, posing as a potential mechanism of their beneficial effects in heart failure outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11278,"journal":{"name":"Current vascular pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current vascular pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701611330060241204062248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have emerged as a groundbreaking class of antidiabetic medications renowned for their glucose-lowering effects and cardiovascular benefits. Recent studies have suggested that SGLT2 inhibitors may extend their influence beyond glycemic control to impact adipose tissue physiology, particularly within the epicardial adipose depot. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), an actively secretory organ surrounding the heart, has been implicated in the modulation of cardiovascular risk.
Aims: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to systematically review and synthesize existing literature on the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on EAT.
Methods: We performed a literature search for studies assessing the changes in epicardial adipose tissue volume/thickness before and after treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor. We excluded reviews, editorials, case reports/case series, experimental studies, and studies that did not use SGLT2 inhibitors as the intervention. The main outcome of interest was the change in EAT volume/thickness at follow-up.
Results: The literature search yielded 72 results. After the application of the exclusion criteria, a total of 11 studies were selected for data extraction and inclusion in the meta-analysis. A mean of 6.57ml decreased EAT volume, and EAT thickness was reduced by a mean of 1.55mm. We detected that treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor was associated with decreased EAT volume/thickness compared to the control group (SMD -1.79, 95% CI -2.91 to -0.66, p<0.01). There was substantial betweenstudy heterogeneity (I2: 94%, p<0.001). Results remained robust even after the exclusion of any single study. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly greater effect size in randomized studies. Funnel plot inspection and Egger's regression test did not indicate the presence of publication bias Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors use is associated with a reduction in EAT volume/thickness, posing as a potential mechanism of their beneficial effects in heart failure outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Current Vascular Pharmacology publishes clinical and research-based reviews/mini-reviews, original research articles, letters, debates, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited issues to update all those concerned with the treatment of vascular disease, bridging the gap between clinical practice and ongoing research.
Vascular disease is the commonest cause of death in Westernized countries and its incidence is on the increase in developing countries. It follows that considerable research is directed at establishing effective treatment for acute vascular events. Long-term treatment has also received considerable attention (e.g. for symptomatic relief). Furthermore, effective prevention, whether primary or secondary, is backed by the findings of several landmark trials. Vascular disease is a complex field with primary care physicians and nurse practitioners as well as several specialties involved. The latter include cardiology, vascular and cardio thoracic surgery, general medicine, radiology, clinical pharmacology and neurology (stroke units).