Utility of glass slide morphology (GSM) and whole slide image (WSI) in the diagnosis of acute leukemia (AL) by types.

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
ecancermedicalscience Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2024.1790
Hamisa Iddy, Ahlam Nasser, Ally Hussein, Anna Schuh, Clara Chamba
{"title":"Utility of glass slide morphology (GSM) and whole slide image (WSI) in the diagnosis of acute leukemia (AL) by types.","authors":"Hamisa Iddy, Ahlam Nasser, Ally Hussein, Anna Schuh, Clara Chamba","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2024.1790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute leukemia (AL) is a diverse group of hematological malignancies characterised by the accumulation of immature blast cells in the bone marrow. Accurate classification into acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is essential for treatment and prognosis. This study aimed to assess the performance of glass slide morphology (GSM) using a light microscope versus whole slide imaging (WSI) in diagnosing and classifying AL, using flow cytometry as the gold standard test. Peripheral smears and bone marrow aspirates from 97 patients suspected of AL were stained with Romanowsky stain and reviewed by a single hematologist. For GSM, the hematologist was provided with a single slide, which was to be evaluated under a light microscope. For WSI, the Alexapath mobile scanner (ADA1) was used to scan the slides for review by the hematologist. Patient identification was concealed from the interpreting hematologist, and an interval of 2 weeks was set between the review of GSM and WSI of the same patient. The sensitivity and specificity of GSM and WSI were compared to the results of flow cytometry. Out of the 97 patients suspected to have AL, 47 were confirmed to have AL by flow cytometry. Among these, 19 (40.4%) were diagnosed with AML and 28 (59.6%) with ALL. GSM demonstrated high sensitivity (89.4%) and specificity (90.0%) for diagnosing AL, but lower sensitivity in distinguishing AML (57.9%) from ALL (75.0%). Similarly, WSI exhibited a reasonable sensitivity (80.9%) and high specificity (98.0%) for diagnosing AL, but lower sensitivity in differentiating AML (57.9%) and ALL (46.4%). GSM and WSI are reasonable and acceptable techniques for accurately screening AL cases and accelerating referral to tertiary centers of excellence.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1790"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2024.1790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute leukemia (AL) is a diverse group of hematological malignancies characterised by the accumulation of immature blast cells in the bone marrow. Accurate classification into acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is essential for treatment and prognosis. This study aimed to assess the performance of glass slide morphology (GSM) using a light microscope versus whole slide imaging (WSI) in diagnosing and classifying AL, using flow cytometry as the gold standard test. Peripheral smears and bone marrow aspirates from 97 patients suspected of AL were stained with Romanowsky stain and reviewed by a single hematologist. For GSM, the hematologist was provided with a single slide, which was to be evaluated under a light microscope. For WSI, the Alexapath mobile scanner (ADA1) was used to scan the slides for review by the hematologist. Patient identification was concealed from the interpreting hematologist, and an interval of 2 weeks was set between the review of GSM and WSI of the same patient. The sensitivity and specificity of GSM and WSI were compared to the results of flow cytometry. Out of the 97 patients suspected to have AL, 47 were confirmed to have AL by flow cytometry. Among these, 19 (40.4%) were diagnosed with AML and 28 (59.6%) with ALL. GSM demonstrated high sensitivity (89.4%) and specificity (90.0%) for diagnosing AL, but lower sensitivity in distinguishing AML (57.9%) from ALL (75.0%). Similarly, WSI exhibited a reasonable sensitivity (80.9%) and high specificity (98.0%) for diagnosing AL, but lower sensitivity in differentiating AML (57.9%) and ALL (46.4%). GSM and WSI are reasonable and acceptable techniques for accurately screening AL cases and accelerating referral to tertiary centers of excellence.

玻璃片形态学(GSM)和全片图像(WSI)在急性白血病(AL)分型诊断中的应用
急性白血病(AL)是一种以未成熟母细胞在骨髓中积累为特征的多种血液系统恶性肿瘤。准确分类为急性髓性白血病(AML)或急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)对治疗和预后至关重要。本研究以流式细胞术为金标准,比较光学显微镜下的玻璃载玻片形态学(GSM)和全载玻片成像(WSI)对AL的诊断和分类效果。用罗曼诺夫斯基染色法对97例疑似AL患者的外周血涂片和骨髓抽吸液进行了染色,并由一位血液学家进行了回顾。对于GSM,血液学家提供了一张载玻片,在光学显微镜下进行评估。对于WSI,使用Alexapath移动扫描仪(ADA1)扫描载玻片供血液学家检查。对解释血液学家隐瞒患者的身份,并且在同一患者的GSM和WSI检查之间设置2周的间隔。将GSM和WSI的敏感性和特异性与流式细胞术结果进行比较。在97例疑似AL的患者中,47例经流式细胞术证实为AL。其中19例(40.4%)诊断为AML, 28例(59.6%)诊断为ALL。GSM在诊断AL方面具有较高的敏感性(89.4%)和特异性(90.0%),但在区分AML(57.9%)和ALL(75.0%)方面的敏感性较低。同样,WSI在诊断AL方面表现出合理的敏感性(80.9%)和高特异性(98.0%),但在鉴别AML(57.9%)和ALL(46.4%)方面的敏感性较低。GSM和WSI是合理和可接受的技术,准确筛选AL病例和加速转诊到三级卓越中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信