Isolated microhematuria in potential kidney donors: evaluating kidney biopsy findings with dipstick urinalysis and urine microscopy results.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfae371
Ehab A Hammad, Dalia A Obeid, Dieter C Broering, Yaser Z Shah, Jens G Brockmann, Kris A Marquez, Ahmed M Nazmi, Hassan A Aleid, Hadeel M AlManea, Amira M AlAbassi, Melba A Solomon, Nancy Jacob, Tariq Z Ali
{"title":"Isolated microhematuria in potential kidney donors: evaluating kidney biopsy findings with dipstick urinalysis and urine microscopy results.","authors":"Ehab A Hammad, Dalia A Obeid, Dieter C Broering, Yaser Z Shah, Jens G Brockmann, Kris A Marquez, Ahmed M Nazmi, Hassan A Aleid, Hadeel M AlManea, Amira M AlAbassi, Melba A Solomon, Nancy Jacob, Tariq Z Ali","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfae371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Isolated microhematuria (IMH) can signal hidden glomerular disease, necessitating detailed evaluations for potential kidney donors, including kidney biopsies. The optimal strategy for deciding on kidney biopsies remains unclear. While the British Transplant Society supports dipstick analysis, KDIGO focuses solely on urine microscopy. This study explored the correlation between kidney biopsy outcomes and results from dipstick urinalysis and urine microscopy in potential kidney donors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study encompassed all potential kidney donors who received kidney biopsies following a positive urine dipstick result for IMH, irrespective of whether red blood cells (RBCs) were found on urine microscopy. We performed sensitivity and specificity analyses to assess the effectiveness of microscopy and dipstick urinalysis in identifying histological abnormalities in the kidney biopsies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 49% of potential donors-133 out of 271-who had kidney biopsies due to positive dipstick tests showed negative results in urine microscopy for RBCs. In total, 168 donor candidates, or 62%, had abnormal findings in their biopsies, with nearly half of those diagnosed with immunoglobulin A nephropathy having negative urine microscopy results. Furthermore, 58% of potential donors with negative urine microscopy results-77 out of 133-also exhibited abnormal biopsy findings. The urine microscopy test displayed a sensitivity of 54.2% (95% confidence interval 46.6-61.5) and a specificity of 54.4% (95% confidence interval 44.8-63.7) for detecting abnormal biopsy results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted a significant presence of donors with IMH with underlying glomerular lesions. Using urine microscopy showed limited sensitivity and specificity in identifying abnormal histopathological results. Relying solely on urine microscopy may miss critical pathologies like IgAN in prospective kidney donors. The persistence of IMH during dipstick urinalysis calls for kidney biopsy in potential donors. These findings suggest that our results be incorporated into future global guideline formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"sfae371"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Isolated microhematuria (IMH) can signal hidden glomerular disease, necessitating detailed evaluations for potential kidney donors, including kidney biopsies. The optimal strategy for deciding on kidney biopsies remains unclear. While the British Transplant Society supports dipstick analysis, KDIGO focuses solely on urine microscopy. This study explored the correlation between kidney biopsy outcomes and results from dipstick urinalysis and urine microscopy in potential kidney donors.

Methods: This retrospective study encompassed all potential kidney donors who received kidney biopsies following a positive urine dipstick result for IMH, irrespective of whether red blood cells (RBCs) were found on urine microscopy. We performed sensitivity and specificity analyses to assess the effectiveness of microscopy and dipstick urinalysis in identifying histological abnormalities in the kidney biopsies.

Results: Approximately 49% of potential donors-133 out of 271-who had kidney biopsies due to positive dipstick tests showed negative results in urine microscopy for RBCs. In total, 168 donor candidates, or 62%, had abnormal findings in their biopsies, with nearly half of those diagnosed with immunoglobulin A nephropathy having negative urine microscopy results. Furthermore, 58% of potential donors with negative urine microscopy results-77 out of 133-also exhibited abnormal biopsy findings. The urine microscopy test displayed a sensitivity of 54.2% (95% confidence interval 46.6-61.5) and a specificity of 54.4% (95% confidence interval 44.8-63.7) for detecting abnormal biopsy results.

Conclusion: This study highlighted a significant presence of donors with IMH with underlying glomerular lesions. Using urine microscopy showed limited sensitivity and specificity in identifying abnormal histopathological results. Relying solely on urine microscopy may miss critical pathologies like IgAN in prospective kidney donors. The persistence of IMH during dipstick urinalysis calls for kidney biopsy in potential donors. These findings suggest that our results be incorporated into future global guideline formulations.

潜在肾供者的分离性微量血尿:用试纸尿分析和尿显微镜结果评估肾活检结果。
背景:孤立性微血尿(IMH)可能是肾小球疾病隐藏的信号,需要对潜在的肾供者进行详细的评估,包括肾活检。决定是否进行肾活检的最佳策略尚不清楚。虽然英国移植协会支持量尺分析,但KDIGO只关注尿液显微镜。本研究探讨了潜在肾脏供者肾活检结果与试纸尿分析和尿显微镜检查结果之间的相关性。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了所有在尿试纸检测IMH阳性后接受肾活检的潜在肾供者,无论在尿显微镜下是否发现红细胞。我们进行了敏感性和特异性分析,以评估显微镜和尿试纸分析在鉴别肾活检组织异常方面的有效性。结果:约49%的潜在供者(271人中有133人)由于试纸试验阳性而进行肾脏活检,其尿镜检显示红细胞阴性。总共有168名供体候选人(62%)在活检中发现异常,其中近一半被诊断为免疫球蛋白A肾病的患者尿液显微镜检查结果为阴性。此外,58%尿液显微镜阴性的潜在献血者(133人中有77人)也表现出异常的活检结果。尿镜检检测异常活检结果的敏感性为54.2%(95%可信区间46.6-61.5),特异性为54.4%(95%可信区间44.8-63.7)。结论:本研究突出了伴有肾小球病变的IMH供体的显著存在。使用尿液显微镜在识别异常组织病理学结果方面显示有限的敏感性和特异性。仅依靠尿液显微镜检查可能会遗漏潜在肾脏供者的关键病理,如IgAN。在试纸尿液分析期间,IMH的持续存在要求对潜在供者进行肾活检。这些发现表明,我们的结果将被纳入未来的全球指南制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信