FFR-Negative Nonculprit High-Risk Plaques and Clinical Outcomes in High-Risk Populations: An Individual Patient-Data Pooled Analysis From COMBINE (OCT-FFR) and PECTUS-obs.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rick H J A Volleberg, Andi Rroku, Jan-Quinten Mol, Renicus S Hermanides, Maarten van Leeuwen, Balázs Berta, Martijn Meuwissen, Fernando Alfonso, Wojciech Wojakowski, Anouar Belkacemi, Tomasz Roleder, Elvin Kedhi, Niels van Royen
{"title":"FFR-Negative Nonculprit High-Risk Plaques and Clinical Outcomes in High-Risk Populations: An Individual Patient-Data Pooled Analysis From COMBINE (OCT-FFR) and PECTUS-obs.","authors":"Rick H J A Volleberg, Andi Rroku, Jan-Quinten Mol, Renicus S Hermanides, Maarten van Leeuwen, Balázs Berta, Martijn Meuwissen, Fernando Alfonso, Wojciech Wojakowski, Anouar Belkacemi, Tomasz Roleder, Elvin Kedhi, Niels van Royen","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided deferral of revascularization, recurrent events in patients with diabetes or after myocardial infarction remain common. This study aimed to assess the association between FFR-negative but high-risk nonculprit lesions and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a patient-level pooled analysis of the prospective natural-history COMBINE (OCT-FFR) study (Optical Coherence Tomography Morphologic and Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment in Diabetes Mellitus Patients) and PECTUS-obs study (Identification of Risk Factors for Acute Coronary Events by OCT After STEMI and NSTEMI Patients With Residual Non- Flow Limiting Lesions). Optical coherence tomography was performed on all FFR-negative (FFR >0.80) native nonculprit lesions. Patients or lesions with a high-risk plaque were compared with those without a high-risk plaque. A high-risk plaque was defined in the presence of at least 2 prespecified criteria: (1) lipid arc ≥90<sup>o</sup>, (2) minimum fibrous cap thickness <65 µm, and (3) presence of either plaque rupture or thrombus. The primary end points were native major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization excluding stent-failure-related events and nonattributable events) and target lesion failure (composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 810 patients, 450 (55.6%) had a history of diabetes and 482 (59.5%) presented with myocardial infarction. At least 1 high-risk plaque was identified in 271 (33.5%) patients and 287 (30.6%) lesions. Over a median follow-up of 761 (interquartile range, 731-1175) days, the presence of a high-risk plaque was associated with patient-level native major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 2.127 [95% CI, 1.451-3.120]; <i>P</i><0.001) and lesion-level target lesion failure (hazard ratio, 2.623 [95% CI, 1.559-4.414]; <i>P</i><0.001). The risk of adverse outcomes increased with the copresence of multiple high-risk features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FFR-negative but high-risk nonculprit lesions are associated with adverse patient- and lesion-level clinical outcomes. These findings emphasize the additional value of intracoronary imaging in patients with FFR-negative nonculprit lesions.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02989740; Unique identifier: NCT03857971.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e014667"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014667","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided deferral of revascularization, recurrent events in patients with diabetes or after myocardial infarction remain common. This study aimed to assess the association between FFR-negative but high-risk nonculprit lesions and clinical outcomes.

Methods: This is a patient-level pooled analysis of the prospective natural-history COMBINE (OCT-FFR) study (Optical Coherence Tomography Morphologic and Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment in Diabetes Mellitus Patients) and PECTUS-obs study (Identification of Risk Factors for Acute Coronary Events by OCT After STEMI and NSTEMI Patients With Residual Non- Flow Limiting Lesions). Optical coherence tomography was performed on all FFR-negative (FFR >0.80) native nonculprit lesions. Patients or lesions with a high-risk plaque were compared with those without a high-risk plaque. A high-risk plaque was defined in the presence of at least 2 prespecified criteria: (1) lipid arc ≥90o, (2) minimum fibrous cap thickness <65 µm, and (3) presence of either plaque rupture or thrombus. The primary end points were native major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization excluding stent-failure-related events and nonattributable events) and target lesion failure (composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization).

Results: Among 810 patients, 450 (55.6%) had a history of diabetes and 482 (59.5%) presented with myocardial infarction. At least 1 high-risk plaque was identified in 271 (33.5%) patients and 287 (30.6%) lesions. Over a median follow-up of 761 (interquartile range, 731-1175) days, the presence of a high-risk plaque was associated with patient-level native major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 2.127 [95% CI, 1.451-3.120]; P<0.001) and lesion-level target lesion failure (hazard ratio, 2.623 [95% CI, 1.559-4.414]; P<0.001). The risk of adverse outcomes increased with the copresence of multiple high-risk features.

Conclusions: FFR-negative but high-risk nonculprit lesions are associated with adverse patient- and lesion-level clinical outcomes. These findings emphasize the additional value of intracoronary imaging in patients with FFR-negative nonculprit lesions.

Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02989740; Unique identifier: NCT03857971.

高危人群中ffr阴性的非罪魁祸首高危斑块和临床结果:来自COMBINE (OCT-FFR)和PECTUS-obs的个体患者数据汇总分析
背景:尽管分数血流储备(FFR)引导的延迟血运重建,糖尿病患者或心肌梗死后的复发事件仍然很常见。本研究旨在评估ffr阴性但高风险的非罪魁祸首病变与临床结果之间的关系。方法:这是一项患者水平的前瞻性自然史COMBINE (OCT- ffr)研究(糖尿病患者的光学相干断层扫描形态学和分数血流储备评估)和PECTUS-obs研究(STEMI和NSTEMI患者残留非血流限制病变后通过OCT识别急性冠状动脉事件的危险因素)的汇总分析。对所有FFR阴性(FFR >0.80)的原生非罪魁祸首病变进行光学相干断层扫描。有高风险斑块的患者或病变与没有高风险斑块的患者或病变进行比较。高风险斑块的定义至少有两个预先规定的标准:(1)脂质弧度≥90;(2)最小纤维帽厚度。结果:在810例患者中,450例(55.6%)有糖尿病史,482例(59.5%)有心肌梗死。271例(33.5%)患者和287例(30.6%)病变中至少发现1个高危斑块。中位随访761天(四分位间距731-1175天),高危斑块的存在与患者水平的主要不良心血管事件相关(风险比2.127 [95% CI, 1.451-3.120];ppp结论:ffr阴性但高风险的非罪魁祸首病变与患者和病变水平的不良临床结果相关。这些发现强调了冠状动脉内成像对ffr阴性非罪魁祸首病变患者的额外价值。注册:网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02989740;唯一标识符:NCT03857971。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信