Empowering personalized oncology: evolution of digital support and visualization tools for molecular tumor boards.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Cosima Strantz, Dominik Böhm, Thomas Ganslandt, Melanie Börries, Patrick Metzger, Thomas Pauli, Andreas Blaumeiser, Alexander Scheiter, Ian-Christopher Jung, Jan Christoph, Iryna Manuilova, Konstantin Strauch, Arsenij Ustjanzew, Niklas Reimer, Hauke Busch, Philipp Unberath
{"title":"Empowering personalized oncology: evolution of digital support and visualization tools for molecular tumor boards.","authors":"Cosima Strantz, Dominik Böhm, Thomas Ganslandt, Melanie Börries, Patrick Metzger, Thomas Pauli, Andreas Blaumeiser, Alexander Scheiter, Ian-Christopher Jung, Jan Christoph, Iryna Manuilova, Konstantin Strauch, Arsenij Ustjanzew, Niklas Reimer, Hauke Busch, Philipp Unberath","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02821-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) play a pivotal role in personalized oncology, leveraging complex data sets to tailor therapy for cancer patients. The integration of digital support and visualization tools is essential in this rapidly evolving field facing fast-growing data and changing clinical processes. This study addresses the gap in understanding the evolution of software and visualization needs within MTBs and evaluates the current state of digital support. Alignment between user requirements and software development is crucial to avoid waste of resources and maintain trust.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In two consecutive nationwide medical informatics projects in Germany, surveys and expert interviews were conducted as stage 1 (n = 14), stage 2 (n = 30), and stage 3 (n = 9). Surveys, via the SoSci Survey tool, covered participants' roles, working methods, and support needs. The second survey additionally addressed requirements for visualization solutions in molecular tumor boards. These aimed to understand diverse requirements for preparation, implementation, and documentation. Nine semi-structured expert interviews complemented quantitative findings through open discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using quantitative and qualitative analyses, we show that existing digital tools may improve therapy recommendations and streamline MTB case preparation, while continuous training and system improvements are needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study contributes to the field by highlighting the importance of developing user-centric, customizable software solutions that can adapt to the fast-paced environment of MTBs to advance personalized oncology. In doing so, it lays the foundation for further advances in personalized medicine in oncology and points to a shift towards more efficient, technology-driven clinical decision-making processes. This research not only enriches our understanding of the integration of digital tools into MTBs, but also signals a broader shift towards technological innovation in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02821-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) play a pivotal role in personalized oncology, leveraging complex data sets to tailor therapy for cancer patients. The integration of digital support and visualization tools is essential in this rapidly evolving field facing fast-growing data and changing clinical processes. This study addresses the gap in understanding the evolution of software and visualization needs within MTBs and evaluates the current state of digital support. Alignment between user requirements and software development is crucial to avoid waste of resources and maintain trust.

Methods: In two consecutive nationwide medical informatics projects in Germany, surveys and expert interviews were conducted as stage 1 (n = 14), stage 2 (n = 30), and stage 3 (n = 9). Surveys, via the SoSci Survey tool, covered participants' roles, working methods, and support needs. The second survey additionally addressed requirements for visualization solutions in molecular tumor boards. These aimed to understand diverse requirements for preparation, implementation, and documentation. Nine semi-structured expert interviews complemented quantitative findings through open discussion.

Results: Using quantitative and qualitative analyses, we show that existing digital tools may improve therapy recommendations and streamline MTB case preparation, while continuous training and system improvements are needed.

Conclusions: Our study contributes to the field by highlighting the importance of developing user-centric, customizable software solutions that can adapt to the fast-paced environment of MTBs to advance personalized oncology. In doing so, it lays the foundation for further advances in personalized medicine in oncology and points to a shift towards more efficient, technology-driven clinical decision-making processes. This research not only enriches our understanding of the integration of digital tools into MTBs, but also signals a broader shift towards technological innovation in healthcare.

授权个性化肿瘤学:分子肿瘤板的数字支持和可视化工具的演变。
背景:分子肿瘤委员会(MTBs)在个性化肿瘤学中发挥着关键作用,利用复杂的数据集为癌症患者量身定制治疗。面对快速增长的数据和不断变化的临床过程,数字支持和可视化工具的集成在这个快速发展的领域是必不可少的。本研究解决了理解mtb中软件和可视化需求演变的差距,并评估了数字支持的当前状态。用户需求和软件开发之间的一致性对于避免资源浪费和维护信任至关重要。方法:在德国连续进行的两个全国性医学信息学项目中,采用问卷调查和专家访谈作为第一阶段(n = 14)、第二阶段(n = 30)和第三阶段(n = 9)。通过社会科学调查工具进行的调查涵盖了参与者的角色、工作方法和支持需求。第二项调查还讨论了分子肿瘤板可视化解决方案的要求。它们旨在理解准备、实现和文档的各种需求。九次半结构化的专家访谈通过公开讨论补充了定量研究结果。结果:通过定量和定性分析,我们发现现有的数字工具可以改善治疗建议和简化MTB病例准备,同时需要持续的培训和系统改进。结论:我们的研究强调了开发以用户为中心、可定制的软件解决方案的重要性,这些解决方案可以适应mtb的快节奏环境,从而推进个性化肿瘤治疗。在此过程中,它为肿瘤学个性化医疗的进一步发展奠定了基础,并指出了向更高效、技术驱动的临床决策过程的转变。这项研究不仅丰富了我们对将数字工具集成到mtb中的理解,而且还标志着医疗保健领域向技术创新的更广泛转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信