Safety and performance of a novel synthetic biomimetic scaffold for iliac crest defect reconstruction during surgical treatment of pelvic girdle pain: a first-in-human trial.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Peter V Giannoudis, Paul Andrzejwski, George Chloros, Elizabeth M A Hensor
{"title":"Safety and performance of a novel synthetic biomimetic scaffold for iliac crest defect reconstruction during surgical treatment of pelvic girdle pain: a first-in-human trial.","authors":"Peter V Giannoudis, Paul Andrzejwski, George Chloros, Elizabeth M A Hensor","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldae023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical treatment of pelvic girdle pain (PGP) involves arthrodesis of sacroiliac (SI) and pubic symphysis joints. Fusion of pubic symphysis involves the implantation of an autologous iliac crest tricortical graft harvested from the iliac crest. The objective was to assess the safety of a novel synthetic graft substitute (b.Bone) for iliac crest reconstruction and to evaluate the results of PGP surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>Consecutive participants undergoing pelvic fusion and requiring iliac crest reconstruction were enrolled and followed-up for 12 months in a prospective first-in-human clinical investigation. Adverse events were documented, and health-related quality of life was evaluated using EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire. Iliac crest defect healing was evaluated by the Modified Lane and Sandhu radiological scoring system. In addition, relevant published peer-reviewed scientific articles identified from PubMed.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>The EQ-5D-5L scores improved steadily reaching the highest point at 365 days. By 365 days complete healing of the bone defect was observed.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The management of PGP remains challenging with mixed results reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>While there is lack of consensus on how to manage PGP, the present study shows improved outcomes at one year following surgery. The synthetic b.Bone scaffold is a safe option with good healing outcomes for iliac crest defect reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Although b.Bone synthetic scaffold found to be safe, further studies reporting on surgical treatment of PGP are required to confirm the findings in comparative trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"153 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11738167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldae023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical treatment of pelvic girdle pain (PGP) involves arthrodesis of sacroiliac (SI) and pubic symphysis joints. Fusion of pubic symphysis involves the implantation of an autologous iliac crest tricortical graft harvested from the iliac crest. The objective was to assess the safety of a novel synthetic graft substitute (b.Bone) for iliac crest reconstruction and to evaluate the results of PGP surgical treatment.

Sources of data: Consecutive participants undergoing pelvic fusion and requiring iliac crest reconstruction were enrolled and followed-up for 12 months in a prospective first-in-human clinical investigation. Adverse events were documented, and health-related quality of life was evaluated using EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire. Iliac crest defect healing was evaluated by the Modified Lane and Sandhu radiological scoring system. In addition, relevant published peer-reviewed scientific articles identified from PubMed.

Areas of agreement: The EQ-5D-5L scores improved steadily reaching the highest point at 365 days. By 365 days complete healing of the bone defect was observed.

Areas of controversy: The management of PGP remains challenging with mixed results reported in the literature.

Growing points: While there is lack of consensus on how to manage PGP, the present study shows improved outcomes at one year following surgery. The synthetic b.Bone scaffold is a safe option with good healing outcomes for iliac crest defect reconstruction.

Areas timely for developing research: Although b.Bone synthetic scaffold found to be safe, further studies reporting on surgical treatment of PGP are required to confirm the findings in comparative trials.

一种新型合成仿生支架用于骨盆带痛手术治疗中髂骨缺损重建的安全性和性能:首次人体试验。
导言:骨盆带痛(PGP)的手术治疗涉及骶髂(SI)和耻骨联合关节的关节融合术。耻骨联合融合包括从髂骨上取下的自体髂骨三皮质移植物。目的是评估一种新型合成移植物替代物(b.Bone)用于髂骨重建的安全性,并评估PGP手术治疗的结果。数据来源:在一项前瞻性的首次人体临床研究中,连续接受骨盆融合和需要髂骨重建的参与者被招募并随访了12个月。记录不良事件,并使用EuroQol-5D-5L问卷评估与健康相关的生活质量。采用改良Lane和Sandhu放射评分系统评价髂嵴缺损愈合情况。此外,从PubMed中确定的相关已发表的同行评审的科学文章。一致领域:EQ-5D-5L评分稳步提高,在365天达到最高点。365天观察到骨缺损完全愈合。争议领域:PGP的管理仍然具有挑战性,文献报道的结果好坏参半。成长要点:虽然在如何处理PGP方面缺乏共识,但目前的研究表明,手术后一年的结果有所改善。人工骨支架是髂嵴缺损重建的一种安全的选择,具有良好的愈合效果。需要及时开展研究的领域:虽然b.骨合成支架被发现是安全的,但需要进一步的研究报道PGP的手术治疗,以在比较试验中证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British medical bulletin
British medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries. Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信