Effectiveness of a BOPPPS Teaching Model in Standardized Training for Nephrology Resident Physicians: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-30 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2024.0437
Yuting Li, Fei Ren, Jin Qiu, Defu Li, Jiangmei Wang, Shan Lin
{"title":"Effectiveness of a BOPPPS Teaching Model in Standardized Training for Nephrology Resident Physicians: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Yuting Li, Fei Ren, Jin Qiu, Defu Li, Jiangmei Wang, Shan Lin","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Based on Bridge-in, Objective, Pre-assessment, Participatory learning, Post-assessment and Summary (BOPPPS), the teaching model has gained increasing attention in the field of medical education. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the BOPPPS teaching model in standardized training for nephrology residents, particularly in educating on hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). <b>Methods</b> This retrospective cohort study included students undergoing standardized training in the nephrology department at the Shanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine-Integrated Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from 2021 to 2024. The observation group (n = 55) received instructions using the BOPPPS teaching model, while the control group (n = 64) was educated using the traditional teaching methods. The study evaluated learning outcomes and teaching satisfaction through theoretical and practical assessments, as well as self-assessment by the students. <b>Results</b> The observation group demonstrated significantly higher scores in theoretical exams and practical assessments compared to the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group reported higher self-assessment scores (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and greater teaching satisfaction (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than the control group. <b>Conclusion</b> The BOPPPS teaching model is an effective approach to enhancing theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and teaching satisfaction in standardized training for nephrology residents. Compared to traditional teaching methods, the BOPPPS model improves learning outcomes, thereby strengthening the quality of medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"85 12","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Background Based on Bridge-in, Objective, Pre-assessment, Participatory learning, Post-assessment and Summary (BOPPPS), the teaching model has gained increasing attention in the field of medical education. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the BOPPPS teaching model in standardized training for nephrology residents, particularly in educating on hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods This retrospective cohort study included students undergoing standardized training in the nephrology department at the Shanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine-Integrated Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from 2021 to 2024. The observation group (n = 55) received instructions using the BOPPPS teaching model, while the control group (n = 64) was educated using the traditional teaching methods. The study evaluated learning outcomes and teaching satisfaction through theoretical and practical assessments, as well as self-assessment by the students. Results The observation group demonstrated significantly higher scores in theoretical exams and practical assessments compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group reported higher self-assessment scores (p < 0.05) and greater teaching satisfaction (p < 0.05) than the control group. Conclusion The BOPPPS teaching model is an effective approach to enhancing theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and teaching satisfaction in standardized training for nephrology residents. Compared to traditional teaching methods, the BOPPPS model improves learning outcomes, thereby strengthening the quality of medical education.

BOPPPS教学模式在肾内科住院医师规范化培训中的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
基于“入桥-目标-预评-参与式学习-后评-总结”(BOPPPS)的教学模式越来越受到医学教育领域的关注。本研究旨在评估BOPPPS教学模式在肾病住院医师标准化培训中的有效性,特别是在慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)高钾血症教育方面。方法回顾性队列研究纳入了2021 - 2024年在上海中医药大学附属上海中医综合医院肾内科接受标准化培训的学生。观察组(n = 55)采用BOPPPS教学模式,对照组(n = 64)采用传统教学方法。本研究通过理论评估和实践评估以及学生自我评估来评估学习成果和教学满意度。结果观察组患者在理论考试和实践考试中的得分均显著高于对照组(p < 0.05)。观察组学生自我评价得分显著高于对照组(p < 0.05),教学满意度显著高于对照组(p < 0.05)。结论BOPPPS教学模式是提高肾内科住院医师规范化培训理论知识、实践技能和教学满意度的有效途径。与传统的教学方法相比,BOPPPS模式提高了学习效果,从而加强了医学教育的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信