Breastfeeding Attitudes and Milk Production of Mothers Staying in Single and Double Rooms after Birth: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Aysun Ekşioğlu, Nilüfer Ataç, Emine Serap Çağan, Rabia Genç, Esin Çeber Turfan
{"title":"Breastfeeding Attitudes and Milk Production of Mothers Staying in Single and Double Rooms after Birth: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.","authors":"Aysun Ekşioğlu, Nilüfer Ataç, Emine Serap Çağan, Rabia Genç, Esin Çeber Turfan","doi":"10.1089/bfm.2024.0222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> There is limited evidence on whether the interaction of mothers staying in double rooms (DRs) in the hospital after birth affects breastfeeding attitudes and milk production. <b><i>Research Aim:</i></b> To compare the breastfeeding attitudes and milk production of mothers staying in a DR in the hospital after birth with mothers staying in a single room (SR). <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In the study, 181 mothers who gave birth at term were included. Of them, 92 stayed in SRs, and 89 stayed in DRs. The milk production and breastfeeding attitudes of the mothers were considered as dependent variables. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mothers staying in SRs needed health care professional support more (83.7%) than did the mothers staying in DRs (71.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Milk production was more in the mothers staying in SRs (χ<sub>mean</sub>: 14.16 ± 3.34) than it was in the mothers staying in DRs (χ<sub>mean</sub>: 10.13 ± 2.42; <i>p</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the breastfeeding attitudes of the participants in terms of the type of the room they stayed in. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> While most mothers prefer staying in a SR in terms of privacy and comfort, some mothers prefer staying in a multiple-bed room because social interactions they have positively affect their breastfeeding attitudes. Health care institutions may consider incorporating shared or DRs into their postpartum care protocols, which creates comfortable and supportive environments for breastfeeding mothers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"42-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2024.0222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence on whether the interaction of mothers staying in double rooms (DRs) in the hospital after birth affects breastfeeding attitudes and milk production. Research Aim: To compare the breastfeeding attitudes and milk production of mothers staying in a DR in the hospital after birth with mothers staying in a single room (SR). Materials and Methods: In the study, 181 mothers who gave birth at term were included. Of them, 92 stayed in SRs, and 89 stayed in DRs. The milk production and breastfeeding attitudes of the mothers were considered as dependent variables. Results: The mothers staying in SRs needed health care professional support more (83.7%) than did the mothers staying in DRs (71.9%; p < 0.05). Milk production was more in the mothers staying in SRs (χmean: 14.16 ± 3.34) than it was in the mothers staying in DRs (χmean: 10.13 ± 2.42; p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the breastfeeding attitudes of the participants in terms of the type of the room they stayed in. Conclusions: While most mothers prefer staying in a SR in terms of privacy and comfort, some mothers prefer staying in a multiple-bed room because social interactions they have positively affect their breastfeeding attitudes. Health care institutions may consider incorporating shared or DRs into their postpartum care protocols, which creates comfortable and supportive environments for breastfeeding mothers.

母乳喂养态度与产奶量:一项横断面比较研究。
背景:关于分娩后住在医院双人间的母亲的互动是否影响母乳喂养态度和产奶量的证据有限。研究目的:比较产后住院单间母亲与住院单间母亲的母乳喂养态度和产奶量。材料与方法:本研究共纳入181例足月分娩的产妇。其中,92人继续进行srr治疗,89人继续进行dr治疗。以母亲的产奶量和母乳喂养态度为因变量。结果:留守家庭母亲对卫生保健专业人员支持的需求(83.7%)高于留守家庭母亲(71.9%);P < 0.05)。待在特别护理区母亲的产奶量(χ均值:14.16±3.34)高于待在普通护理区的母亲(χ均值:10.13±2.42;P < 0.05)。不同房间类型对母乳喂养态度的影响不显著。结论:虽然大多数母亲出于隐私和舒适的考虑更喜欢住在SR房间,但一些母亲更喜欢住在多床房间,因为社交互动对她们的母乳喂养态度有积极的影响。卫生保健机构可考虑将共享或dr纳入其产后护理方案,为母乳喂养的母亲创造舒适和支持性的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Medicine
Breastfeeding Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols. Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes: Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols Health consequences of artificial feeding Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother Breastfeeding indications and contraindications Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity International public health issues including social and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信