Theoretical impact of a bedside decision-making tool on antibiotic use for suspected neonatal healthcare-associated infection: an observational study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Lizel Georgi Lloyd, Mirjam Maria van Weissenbruch, Adrie Bekker, Cecilia Ferreyra, Birgitta Gleeson, Angela Dramowski
{"title":"Theoretical impact of a bedside decision-making tool on antibiotic use for suspected neonatal healthcare-associated infection: an observational study.","authors":"Lizel Georgi Lloyd, Mirjam Maria van Weissenbruch, Adrie Bekker, Cecilia Ferreyra, Birgitta Gleeson, Angela Dramowski","doi":"10.1186/s12887-024-05323-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are a leading contributor to morbidity and mortality in hospitalised neonates. Diagnosing neonatal HAI is challenging owing to non-specific symptoms and lack of definitive diagnostic markers, contributing to high rates of inappropriate antibiotic use. This study evaluated the theoretical impact of implementing a bedside tool for decision-making on antibiotic length of therapy (LOT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational physician-blinded study consecutively enrolled patients with suspected HAI events at a large South African neonatal unit from September 2022 to September 2023. The antibiotic decision-making tool included an infection prediction score (NeoHoP), and a point-of-care C-reactive protein test (CRP) performed at HAI diagnosis and 24 h later. The theoretical impact of the tool on antibiotic LOT was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 180 neonates with 214 episodes of suspected HAI, of which 22 (10.3%) were proven HAI, 56 (26.2%) were presumed HAI and 136 (63.6%) had HAI ruled out. The median observed antibiotic LOT was three days (9 days for proven HAI, 7 days for presumed HAI, and 3 days for no HAI). The antibiotic decision-making tool would theoretically reduce overall antibiotic LOT by 2 days (p < 0.001), particularly in neonates where HAI was subsequently excluded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed an antibiotic decision-making tool to support the clinical evaluation of suspected neonatal HAI and demonstrated a significant potential impact on reducing antibiotic LOT. Given increasing antibiotic resistance rates globally, this tool should be further evaluated to minimise unnecessary antibiotic use in hospitalised neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05323-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are a leading contributor to morbidity and mortality in hospitalised neonates. Diagnosing neonatal HAI is challenging owing to non-specific symptoms and lack of definitive diagnostic markers, contributing to high rates of inappropriate antibiotic use. This study evaluated the theoretical impact of implementing a bedside tool for decision-making on antibiotic length of therapy (LOT).

Methods: This prospective observational physician-blinded study consecutively enrolled patients with suspected HAI events at a large South African neonatal unit from September 2022 to September 2023. The antibiotic decision-making tool included an infection prediction score (NeoHoP), and a point-of-care C-reactive protein test (CRP) performed at HAI diagnosis and 24 h later. The theoretical impact of the tool on antibiotic LOT was calculated.

Results: We recruited 180 neonates with 214 episodes of suspected HAI, of which 22 (10.3%) were proven HAI, 56 (26.2%) were presumed HAI and 136 (63.6%) had HAI ruled out. The median observed antibiotic LOT was three days (9 days for proven HAI, 7 days for presumed HAI, and 3 days for no HAI). The antibiotic decision-making tool would theoretically reduce overall antibiotic LOT by 2 days (p < 0.001), particularly in neonates where HAI was subsequently excluded.

Conclusion: We developed an antibiotic decision-making tool to support the clinical evaluation of suspected neonatal HAI and demonstrated a significant potential impact on reducing antibiotic LOT. Given increasing antibiotic resistance rates globally, this tool should be further evaluated to minimise unnecessary antibiotic use in hospitalised neonates.

床边决策工具对疑似新生儿卫生保健相关感染抗生素使用的理论影响:一项观察性研究。
背景和目的:医疗保健相关感染(HAI)是住院新生儿发病率和死亡率的主要原因。由于非特异性症状和缺乏明确的诊断标记,诊断新生儿HAI具有挑战性,导致不适当使用抗生素的比率很高。本研究评估了实施床边工具对抗生素治疗时间(LOT)决策的理论影响。方法:这项前瞻性观察性医生盲法研究于2022年9月至2023年9月在南非一家大型新生儿病房连续招募疑似HAI事件的患者。抗生素决策工具包括感染预测评分(NeoHoP),以及在HAI诊断时和24小时后进行的即时c反应蛋白检测(CRP)。计算了该工具对抗生素LOT的理论影响。结果:我们招募了214例疑似HAI发作的180例新生儿,其中确诊HAI 22例(10.3%),推定HAI 56例(26.2%),排除HAI 136例(63.6%)。观察到的抗生素LOT中位数为3天(确诊HAI为9天,推定HAI为7天,无HAI为3天)。结论:我们开发了一种抗生素决策工具,以支持疑似新生儿HAI的临床评估,并显示出降低抗生素LOT的显着潜在影响。鉴于全球抗生素耐药率不断上升,应进一步评估这一工具,以尽量减少住院新生儿不必要的抗生素使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信