Intervention to systematize fall risk assessment and prevention in older hospitalized adults: a mixed methods study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Johann Stuby, Pascal Leist, Noël Hauri, Sanjana Jeevanji, Marie Méan, Carole E Aubert
{"title":"Intervention to systematize fall risk assessment and prevention in older hospitalized adults: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Johann Stuby, Pascal Leist, Noël Hauri, Sanjana Jeevanji, Marie Méan, Carole E Aubert","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05703-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fall-prevention interventions are efficient but resource-requiring and should target persons at higher risk of falls. We need to ensure that fall risk is systematically assessed in everyday practice. We conducted a quality improvement (QI) intervention to systematize fall risk assessment and prevention in older adults hospitalized on general internal medicine wards. We evaluated the efficacy of the intervention in a pre-post intervention study and assessed its feasibility and acceptability through a mixed methods process evaluation, which results are reported in here.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The QI intervention was conducted between 09/2022 and 10/2023 and targeted the nursing staff and residents in two tertiary hospitals of two different language and cultural regions of Switzerland. The intervention comprised an oral presentation, an e-learning, and reminder quizzes. We conducted a process evaluation including 25 interviews and a survey sent to all participants to assess feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and qualitative data with a mixed deductive and inductive approach. Results were integrated through meta-inferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 544 clinicians, 59% completed the e-learning, 74% found the intervention useful, and 25% reported an increase in interprofessional team working. A rewarding system was deemed motivating by 33% of clinicians. Main implementation barrier was the high workload. A concise and clear content as well as regular reminders were perceived as facilitators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A concise and multimodal QI intervention with regular reminders seemed to be feasible and well-accepted. Future QI intervention projects should consider the barriers and facilitators identified in this project to improve quality of care in older hospitalized adults.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The conducted research was not pre-registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05703-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fall-prevention interventions are efficient but resource-requiring and should target persons at higher risk of falls. We need to ensure that fall risk is systematically assessed in everyday practice. We conducted a quality improvement (QI) intervention to systematize fall risk assessment and prevention in older adults hospitalized on general internal medicine wards. We evaluated the efficacy of the intervention in a pre-post intervention study and assessed its feasibility and acceptability through a mixed methods process evaluation, which results are reported in here.

Methods: The QI intervention was conducted between 09/2022 and 10/2023 and targeted the nursing staff and residents in two tertiary hospitals of two different language and cultural regions of Switzerland. The intervention comprised an oral presentation, an e-learning, and reminder quizzes. We conducted a process evaluation including 25 interviews and a survey sent to all participants to assess feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and qualitative data with a mixed deductive and inductive approach. Results were integrated through meta-inferences.

Results: Among 544 clinicians, 59% completed the e-learning, 74% found the intervention useful, and 25% reported an increase in interprofessional team working. A rewarding system was deemed motivating by 33% of clinicians. Main implementation barrier was the high workload. A concise and clear content as well as regular reminders were perceived as facilitators.

Conclusions: A concise and multimodal QI intervention with regular reminders seemed to be feasible and well-accepted. Future QI intervention projects should consider the barriers and facilitators identified in this project to improve quality of care in older hospitalized adults.

Trial registration: The conducted research was not pre-registered.

对住院老年人跌倒风险评估和预防的系统化干预:一项混合方法研究。
背景:预防跌倒的干预措施是有效的,但需要资源,并应针对跌倒风险较高的人群。我们需要确保在日常实践中系统地评估跌倒风险。我们对普通内科病房住院的老年人进行了质量改进(QI)干预,以系统化跌倒风险评估和预防。我们在干预前后研究中评估了干预的有效性,并通过混合方法过程评估评估了其可行性和可接受性,结果报告在这里。方法:于2022年9月至2023年10月对瑞士两个不同语言和文化地区的两家三级医院的护理人员和居民进行QI干预。干预包括口头陈述、电子学习和提示测验。我们进行了一个过程评估,包括25个访谈和一份发给所有参与者的调查,以评估干预的可行性和可接受性。定量数据的分析描述性和定性数据的混合演绎和归纳的方法。结果通过meta推断进行整合。结果:在544名临床医生中,59%的人完成了电子学习,74%的人认为干预有效,25%的人报告跨专业团队合作增加。33%的临床医生认为奖励系统具有激励作用。主要的实现障碍是高工作量。简明和清晰的内容以及定期提醒被认为是促进因素。结论:一种简洁、多模式、定期提醒的QI干预似乎是可行的,并且被广泛接受。未来的QI干预项目应考虑本项目中确定的障碍和促进因素,以提高住院老年人的护理质量。试验注册:所进行的研究未进行预注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信