Disparities in anxiety and related factors among Chinese older adults across different aged-care models: a comparison of two cross-sectional studies.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Xin Zheng, Ziwen Xu, Jiajie Zhao, Sanyuan Hao, Fuqin Xu, Shuo Ding, Guoqing Liu, Shufan Yang, Benjamin Otsen, Wen Zhu, Zhongliang Bai, Jie Yang, Ren Chen
{"title":"Disparities in anxiety and related factors among Chinese older adults across different aged-care models: a comparison of two cross-sectional studies.","authors":"Xin Zheng, Ziwen Xu, Jiajie Zhao, Sanyuan Hao, Fuqin Xu, Shuo Ding, Guoqing Liu, Shufan Yang, Benjamin Otsen, Wen Zhu, Zhongliang Bai, Jie Yang, Ren Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05653-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety disorders in older adults have become a prominent public health problem due to their concomitant chronic conditions, reduced quality of life and even death. However, fewer studies have been conducted on differences in anxiety among older individuals in different aged-care models, and the interactive relationship between the influencing factors on anxiety remains unclear. The study aimed to examine the disparities in the prevalence of anxiety between community-dwelling and institutionalized older adults and related influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from the Anhui Healthy Longevity Survey (AHLS) and the Anhui Elderly Caring Social Organizations Survey (AECSOS). Data on demographic variables, lifestyle factors and health-related variables in 6968 older adults were used for analysis. Anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment Scale (GAD-7). Binary logistic regression models and a Classification and Regression Tree model (CART) were utilized to examine the relationship between variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of anxiety were 24.3% and 16.7% among community-dwelling older adults and institutionalized older adults, respectively. Several factors including age, gender, residence, education, income level, live alone, and number of chronic diseases showed a linkage with anxiety among community-dwelling older adults. For the institutionalized older adults, gender, residence, source of income, and number of chronic diseases exhibited a significant association with anxiety. We noted the interactive effect, suggesting that community-dwelling female older adults with an income level of less than 6500 RMB per year and reported chronic disease comorbidities had the highest likelihood of anxiety, and institutionalized female older adults with income sources such as pension, subsidy, family providing, and resident in rural areas have the greatest risk of experiencing anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has brought to light the higher risk of anxiety among community-dwelling older adults compared to institutionalized older adults. Targeted interventions are, therefore emphasized to address the negative impact of anxiety for populations at higher risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05653-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anxiety disorders in older adults have become a prominent public health problem due to their concomitant chronic conditions, reduced quality of life and even death. However, fewer studies have been conducted on differences in anxiety among older individuals in different aged-care models, and the interactive relationship between the influencing factors on anxiety remains unclear. The study aimed to examine the disparities in the prevalence of anxiety between community-dwelling and institutionalized older adults and related influencing factors.

Methods: Data were collected from the Anhui Healthy Longevity Survey (AHLS) and the Anhui Elderly Caring Social Organizations Survey (AECSOS). Data on demographic variables, lifestyle factors and health-related variables in 6968 older adults were used for analysis. Anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment Scale (GAD-7). Binary logistic regression models and a Classification and Regression Tree model (CART) were utilized to examine the relationship between variables.

Results: The prevalence of anxiety were 24.3% and 16.7% among community-dwelling older adults and institutionalized older adults, respectively. Several factors including age, gender, residence, education, income level, live alone, and number of chronic diseases showed a linkage with anxiety among community-dwelling older adults. For the institutionalized older adults, gender, residence, source of income, and number of chronic diseases exhibited a significant association with anxiety. We noted the interactive effect, suggesting that community-dwelling female older adults with an income level of less than 6500 RMB per year and reported chronic disease comorbidities had the highest likelihood of anxiety, and institutionalized female older adults with income sources such as pension, subsidy, family providing, and resident in rural areas have the greatest risk of experiencing anxiety.

Conclusions: This study has brought to light the higher risk of anxiety among community-dwelling older adults compared to institutionalized older adults. Targeted interventions are, therefore emphasized to address the negative impact of anxiety for populations at higher risk.

不同养老模式下中国老年人焦虑及相关因素的差异:两项横断面研究的比较
背景:老年人焦虑症已成为一个突出的公共卫生问题,由于其伴随慢性疾病,生活质量下降,甚至死亡。然而,关于不同养老模式下老年人焦虑差异的研究较少,影响因素与焦虑之间的互动关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨社区和机构老年人焦虑患病率的差异及相关影响因素。方法:数据来源于安徽省健康寿命调查(AHLS)和安徽省养老社会组织调查(AECSOS)。6968名老年人的人口统计变量、生活方式因素和健康相关变量数据被用于分析。使用广泛性焦虑障碍评估量表(GAD-7)评估焦虑症状。使用二元逻辑回归模型和分类回归树模型(CART)来检验变量之间的关系。结果:社区老年人和机构老年人的焦虑患病率分别为24.3%和16.7%。包括年龄、性别、居住地、教育程度、收入水平、独居和慢性病数量在内的几个因素显示出与社区居住老年人焦虑的联系。对于被收容的老年人,性别、居住地、收入来源和慢性病数量与焦虑表现出显著的相关性。我们注意到互动效应,表明社区居住的女性老年人中,年收入低于6500元且报告有慢性病合并症的女性老年人焦虑的可能性最高,而养老、补贴、家庭供养等收入来源的机构女性老年人焦虑的风险最大,居住在农村地区。结论:本研究揭示了社区居住老年人的焦虑风险高于机构老年人。因此,强调有针对性的干预措施,以解决焦虑对高危人群的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信