Effect of a calcium-channel blocker and β-blocker combination on reading-to-reading blood pressure variability: a randomized crossover trial.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Jia-Hui Xia, Yi-Bang Cheng, Ting-Yan Xu, Qian-Hui Guo, Chak-Ming Chan, Lei-Xiao Hu, Yan Li, Ji-Guang Wang
{"title":"Effect of a calcium-channel blocker and β-blocker combination on reading-to-reading blood pressure variability: a randomized crossover trial.","authors":"Jia-Hui Xia, Yi-Bang Cheng, Ting-Yan Xu, Qian-Hui Guo, Chak-Ming Chan, Lei-Xiao Hu, Yan Li, Ji-Guang Wang","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the nitrendipine/atenolol combination in comparison with standard-dose nitrendipine or atenolol monotherapy in reducing blood pressure (BP) and blood pressure variability (BPV) as assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized, crossover trial, 32 patients (30-65 years) with grade 1 hypertension and elevated daytime reading-to-reading BPV were randomly assigned to receive either the nitrendipine/atenolol combination (10/20 mg) or standard-dose nitrendipine (10 mg) or atenolol (25 mg) monotherapy for 6 weeks, followed by a crossover to another treatment for 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 31 patients (mean [±SD] age, 49.2 ± 9.6 years) and 12 men. The nitrendipine/atenolol combination significantly reduced from baseline clinic and ambulatory BP and pulse rate (P ≤ 0.002), and 24 h and daytime systolic and diastolic BPV as assessed by SD and average real variability (P ≤ 0.042), but not the coefficient of variation nor nighttime BPV indices (P ≥ 0.06). Significant differences between the nitrendipine/atenolol combination and nitrendipine or atenolol monotherapy at the end of treatment were observed in clinic BP and pulse rate (P ≤ 0.042), but not in 24 h, daytime and nighttime blood pressure and pulse rate, except for daytime DBP and 24 h and daytime pulse rate (P ≤ 0.049). There were no significant differences in BPV between the combination and monotherpy groups at the end of treatment (P ≥ 0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nitrendipine/atenolol combination reduced daytime reading-to-reading BPV, but did not show superiority to nitrendipine or atenolol monotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the nitrendipine/atenolol combination in comparison with standard-dose nitrendipine or atenolol monotherapy in reducing blood pressure (BP) and blood pressure variability (BPV) as assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring.

Methods: In a randomized, crossover trial, 32 patients (30-65 years) with grade 1 hypertension and elevated daytime reading-to-reading BPV were randomly assigned to receive either the nitrendipine/atenolol combination (10/20 mg) or standard-dose nitrendipine (10 mg) or atenolol (25 mg) monotherapy for 6 weeks, followed by a crossover to another treatment for 6 weeks.

Results: The final analysis included 31 patients (mean [±SD] age, 49.2 ± 9.6 years) and 12 men. The nitrendipine/atenolol combination significantly reduced from baseline clinic and ambulatory BP and pulse rate (P ≤ 0.002), and 24 h and daytime systolic and diastolic BPV as assessed by SD and average real variability (P ≤ 0.042), but not the coefficient of variation nor nighttime BPV indices (P ≥ 0.06). Significant differences between the nitrendipine/atenolol combination and nitrendipine or atenolol monotherapy at the end of treatment were observed in clinic BP and pulse rate (P ≤ 0.042), but not in 24 h, daytime and nighttime blood pressure and pulse rate, except for daytime DBP and 24 h and daytime pulse rate (P ≤ 0.049). There were no significant differences in BPV between the combination and monotherpy groups at the end of treatment (P ≥ 0.25).

Conclusion: The nitrendipine/atenolol combination reduced daytime reading-to-reading BPV, but did not show superiority to nitrendipine or atenolol monotherapy.

钙通道阻滞剂和β受体阻滞剂联合使用对读数间血压变异性的影响:一项随机交叉试验。
目的:本研究的目的是通过动态血压监测评估尼替地平/阿替洛尔联合治疗与标准剂量尼替地平或阿替洛尔单药治疗在降低血压(BP)和血压变异性(BPV)方面的疗效。方法:在一项随机交叉试验中,32例(30-65岁)伴有1级高血压和日间阅读-阅读BPV升高的患者被随机分配接受尼群地平/阿替洛尔联合治疗(10/ 20mg)或标准剂量尼群地平(10 mg)或阿替洛尔(25 mg)单药治疗6周,然后交叉到另一种治疗6周。结果:最终纳入31例患者(平均[±SD]年龄49.2±9.6岁),其中男性12例。尼替地平/阿替洛尔联合用药可显著降低临床基线和动态血压、脉率(P≤0.002),通过SD和平均真实变异性(P≤0.042)评估24 h和白天收缩期和舒张期BPV (P≤0.042),但变异系数和夜间BPV指数均无显著降低(P≥0.06)。尼替地平/阿替洛尔联合治疗与尼替地平或阿替洛尔单药治疗结束时临床血压和脉搏率差异有统计学意义(P≤0.042),但24 h、昼夜血压和脉搏率差异无统计学意义(除日间舒张压和24 h、日间脉搏率差异有统计学意义(P≤0.049)。治疗结束时,联合治疗组与单药治疗组BPV差异无统计学意义(P≥0.25)。结论:尼替地平/阿替洛尔联合用药可降低日间阅读-阅读BPV,但不优于尼替地平或阿替洛尔单药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Blood Pressure Monitoring 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research. This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信