Differences in sensorimotor integration, cervical sensorimotor control, and cognitive-motor dual tasking costs in chronic non-specific neck pain patients with high vs. low catastrophizing tendencies compared to healthy controls.
Ibrahim M Moustafa, Amal Ahbouch, Shima Abdollah Mohammad Zadeh, Tamer Shousha, Paul A Oakley, Deed Harrison
{"title":"Differences in sensorimotor integration, cervical sensorimotor control, and cognitive-motor dual tasking costs in chronic non-specific neck pain patients with high vs. low catastrophizing tendencies compared to healthy controls.","authors":"Ibrahim M Moustafa, Amal Ahbouch, Shima Abdollah Mohammad Zadeh, Tamer Shousha, Paul A Oakley, Deed Harrison","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) is a common condition and its relationship to the pain catastrophizing construct in terms of sensorimotor functions and dual task performance is not fully understood. We aimed to investigate the differences in sensorimotor integration, cervical sensorimotor control, and cognitive-motor dual tasking abilities between CNSNP patients (> 3 months) with high versus low catastrophizing tendencies and healthy controls. Ninety participants were recruited, 30 asymptomatic controls, and 60 patients with CNSNP; 30 scoring high (> 75th percentile) and 30 scoring low (< 25th percentile) on the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS). The variables of sensorimotor integration (frontal N30 amplitude), cervical sensorimotor control (head repositioning accuracy (HRA) - left and right), and cognitive-motor dual tasking (percentage of gait speed time increase with a cognitive load) were assessed and compared across groups. In general, performance of sensorimotor integration, cervical sensorimotor control, and cognitive-motor dual tasking abilities was incrementally better comparing the high to low catastrophizing groups, and the low catastrophizing group to the controls. Correlation coefficients between PCS and HRA (left and right) was strong (r = .8, p < 0.001), between PCS and dual tasking cost was moderate (r = .7, p < 0.001), and between PCS and frontal N30 amplitude was moderate (r = .57, p < 0.001). In conclusion, we found that higher pain catastrophizing was associated with poorer sensorimotor integration, cervical sensorimotor control, and cognitive-motor dual tasking in CNSNP patients highlighting the importance of both assessing and treating catastrophizing in the treatment of CNSNP. PERSPECTIVE: This study highlights the significant impact of pain catastrophizing on sensorimotor integration, cervical sensorimotor control, and cognitive-motor dual tasking in CNSNP patients. High catastrophizers are particularly vulnerable to these impairments, suggesting the need for comprehensive treatment approaches that address both psychological as well as physical components.</p>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"481 ","pages":"115434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) is a common condition and its relationship to the pain catastrophizing construct in terms of sensorimotor functions and dual task performance is not fully understood. We aimed to investigate the differences in sensorimotor integration, cervical sensorimotor control, and cognitive-motor dual tasking abilities between CNSNP patients (> 3 months) with high versus low catastrophizing tendencies and healthy controls. Ninety participants were recruited, 30 asymptomatic controls, and 60 patients with CNSNP; 30 scoring high (> 75th percentile) and 30 scoring low (< 25th percentile) on the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS). The variables of sensorimotor integration (frontal N30 amplitude), cervical sensorimotor control (head repositioning accuracy (HRA) - left and right), and cognitive-motor dual tasking (percentage of gait speed time increase with a cognitive load) were assessed and compared across groups. In general, performance of sensorimotor integration, cervical sensorimotor control, and cognitive-motor dual tasking abilities was incrementally better comparing the high to low catastrophizing groups, and the low catastrophizing group to the controls. Correlation coefficients between PCS and HRA (left and right) was strong (r = .8, p < 0.001), between PCS and dual tasking cost was moderate (r = .7, p < 0.001), and between PCS and frontal N30 amplitude was moderate (r = .57, p < 0.001). In conclusion, we found that higher pain catastrophizing was associated with poorer sensorimotor integration, cervical sensorimotor control, and cognitive-motor dual tasking in CNSNP patients highlighting the importance of both assessing and treating catastrophizing in the treatment of CNSNP. PERSPECTIVE: This study highlights the significant impact of pain catastrophizing on sensorimotor integration, cervical sensorimotor control, and cognitive-motor dual tasking in CNSNP patients. High catastrophizers are particularly vulnerable to these impairments, suggesting the need for comprehensive treatment approaches that address both psychological as well as physical components.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.